Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6097|eXtreme to the maX
The government is planning new laws to protect statues in England from being removed "on a whim or at the behest of a baying mob", Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick has said.

Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, he said generations-old monuments should be "considered thoughtfully".

The legislation would require planning permission for any changes and a minister would be given the final veto.

Mr Jenrick added that he had noticed an attempt to set a narrative which seeks to erase part of the nation's history, saying this was "at the hand of the flash mob, or by the decree of a 'cultural committee' of town hall militants and woke worthies".

He said: "We live in a country that believes in the rule of law, but when it comes to protecting our heritage, due process has been overridden. That can't be right.

"Local people should have the chance to be consulted whether a monument should stand or not.

"What has stood for generations should be considered thoughtfully, not removed on a whim or at the behest of a baying mob."
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-55693020

I thought public property was already protected by criminal damage laws, this will help I guess.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
uziq
Member
+492|3443
it is already against the law and people have been prosecuted already.

this is just a sop to the old fogey part of the conservative base. robert jenrick can keep going on about ‘a country that believes in rules’, having been embroiled in about 3 corruption scandals at this point that are as flagrant as a drag queen.

official corruption over billion £ property schemes for your mates in return for political party donations: not bad for the health of a democracy at all.

a statue being pulled from a plinth: we are TOUGH on crime!

In May 2020, Jenrick was involved in controversy as he overruled the Planning Inspectorate and approved a £1 billion luxury housing development for Richard Desmond, a Conservative Party donor and owner of Northern and Shell. Jenrick's decision saved Desmond's company up to £50 million in tax, with the release of documents from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government in July 2020 leading to calls for Jenrick's resignation for his use of a public office for political favours.[2][3] Planning experts for Tower Hamlets council have estimated that Jenrick helped Desmond save an additional £106 million through leniency on affordable housing levels, which could have resulted in a total discount of approximately £150 million.
you’ve got to love these crooks who claim to be motivated by a great and profound love of britain, and who meanwhile are bloodletting its corpse and lining their own pockets at every chance they get. shameless bastards.

easier to play culture wars over some piffling icons of no real moment, isn’t it. these great patriots cutting deals for one another so that they can continue turning london into a storage centre for chinese and arab property! mention ‘woke worthies’, they’re the real enemy of the people!

when’s the last time a statue was even pulled down? it feels like 6 months ago already. yes, what this country needs is to now suddenly get very cross about statues and to clamp down on this serious threat. nevermind that jenrick and his minister chums have totally lost control of the country on about 5 different occasions in this last year.

this reeks of conservatives bringing up ‘critical race theory’ in parliament whilst meanwhile makeshift morgues pop up in hospital carparks.

Last edited by uziq (2021-01-17 00:18:23)

uziq
Member
+492|3443
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6097|eXtreme to the maX
I didn't think people used twitter as a forum to discuss political issues.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
uziq
Member
+492|3443
[x] authors hawking books
[x] millennials making left-wing memes
[x] ‘woke libcucks BLM nazis’
[ ] the leader of the democratic world threatening nuclear war with iran

one of those isn’t like the others. maybe look at that lovely pliable noun, ‘people’, you gasping thick cunt.

let me guess: statues and street names are more important business, in your view, for the UK’s housing minister than dealing with the immense rent and homelessness crisis caused by covid.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6097|eXtreme to the maX
At this point I think Britain is a failed enterprise with no future, thanks to the public school system and the Oxbridge old boys network, there's little point worrying about the detail.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
uziq
Member
+492|3443
another highly interesting post.

your thoughts insights & musings on this matterrrrrdrrr
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6097|eXtreme to the maX
OK best of luck.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
uziq
Member
+492|3443
gfxstzmq etyfds
uziq
Member
+492|3443
amazing that you want to recycle the housing ministers’ weak piss shot across the bows about ‘the woke mob’ but not engage with his actual brief at all.

just why are corrupt housing ministers so interested in statues? at the peak of a winter pandemic where people are freezing to death on the streets of our cities? it’s a bit odd isn’t it? why this messaging now?

nah, let’s just go back to my cave saying ‘best of luck’ for the 1000th time on this forum. is that your parthian shot or something?

dilbert: heh heh ‘woke worthies’, i like the sounds of this.
dilbert: oh this guy is a culpably corrupt half-wit?
dilbert: oh well best of luck, it’s all oxford’s fault again hehheeheheh
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6097|eXtreme to the maX

uziq wrote:

dilbert: oh this guy is a culpably corrupt half-wit?
dilbert: oh well best of luck, it’s all oxford’s fault again hehheeheheh
Does seem to be a consistent pattern there.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
SuperJail Warden
Gone Forever
+634|3711
The Trump White House on Monday released the report of the presidential “1776 Commission,” a sweeping attack on liberal thought and activism that calls for a “patriotic education,” defends America’s founding on the basis of slavery and likens progressivism to fascism.

President Trump formed the commission in September, saying that American heritage was under assault by revolutionary fanatics and that the nation’s schools required a new “pro-American” curriculum.

Its report, released on Martin Luther King’s Birthday, denounces the charge that the American founders were hypocrites who preached equality even as they codified it in the Constitution and held slaves themselves. “This charge is untrue, and has done enormous damage, especially in recent years, with a devastating effect on our civic unity and social fabric,” it says.

The report argues that “distorted histories” of the United States “labor under the illusion that slavery was somehow a uniquely American evil,” and that the institution must “be seen in a much broader perspective,” including “the unfortunate fact” that slavery “has been more the rule than the exception throughout human history.”

“Historical revisionism that tramples honest scholarship and historical truth, shames Americans by highlighting only the sins of their ancestors, and teaches claims of systemic racism that can only be eliminated by more discrimination, is an ideology intended to manipulate opinions more than educate minds,” the report says.

The report is the product of the 18-member commission, which is chaired by Larry Arnn, a Trump ally and president of the conservative Hillsdale College. Other members include Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist, and Mr. Trump’s former domestic policy adviser, Brooke Rollins.

The document asserts that the Civil Rights movement evolved into “identity politics,” which it said “teaches that America itself is to blame for oppression.”

It also said that progressives had created a “fourth branch of government” or “shadow government” which operates with no checks or balances, and likened American liberals to the Italian fascist leader Benito Mussolini, whom it said “sought to centralize power under the management of so-called experts.”


The commission and its report are in part a rebuke to The New York Times Magazine’s 1619 Project, which reframes American history around the consequences of slavery and the contributions of Black Americans. The report denounces the project, as did Mr. Trump in his September speech announcing the commission.
With only days left in office Trump manages to squeeze in just one final insult to liberals.
https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6763|PNW

Sadly, I somehow doubt Trump is going to quit saying and pushing this stuff just because he's out.
SuperJail Warden
Gone Forever
+634|3711
I doubt he knows or cares about any of this. This is pure Republicanism and it should be remembered as such when people advocate voting R for anything.
https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6763|PNW

SuperJail Warden wrote:

I doubt he knows or cares about any of this. This is pure Republicanism and it should be remembered as such when people advocate voting R for anything.
Now now, that's no way to mend the rift in the country. Let's not dwell on the past.
uziq
Member
+492|3443

SuperJail Warden wrote:

The Trump White House on Monday released the report of the presidential “1776 Commission,” a sweeping attack on liberal thought and activism that calls for a “patriotic education,” defends America’s founding on the basis of slavery and likens progressivism to fascism.

President Trump formed the commission in September, saying that American heritage was under assault by revolutionary fanatics and that the nation’s schools required a new “pro-American” curriculum.

Its report, released on Martin Luther King’s Birthday, denounces the charge that the American founders were hypocrites who preached equality even as they codified it in the Constitution and held slaves themselves. “This charge is untrue, and has done enormous damage, especially in recent years, with a devastating effect on our civic unity and social fabric,” it says.

The report argues that “distorted histories” of the United States “labor under the illusion that slavery was somehow a uniquely American evil,” and that the institution must “be seen in a much broader perspective,” including “the unfortunate fact” that slavery “has been more the rule than the exception throughout human history.”

“Historical revisionism that tramples honest scholarship and historical truth, shames Americans by highlighting only the sins of their ancestors, and teaches claims of systemic racism that can only be eliminated by more discrimination, is an ideology intended to manipulate opinions more than educate minds,” the report says.

The report is the product of the 18-member commission, which is chaired by Larry Arnn, a Trump ally and president of the conservative Hillsdale College. Other members include Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist, and Mr. Trump’s former domestic policy adviser, Brooke Rollins.

The document asserts that the Civil Rights movement evolved into “identity politics,” which it said “teaches that America itself is to blame for oppression.”

It also said that progressives had created a “fourth branch of government” or “shadow government” which operates with no checks or balances, and likened American liberals to the Italian fascist leader Benito Mussolini, whom it said “sought to centralize power under the management of so-called experts.”


The commission and its report are in part a rebuke to The New York Times Magazine’s 1619 Project, which reframes American history around the consequences of slavery and the contributions of Black Americans. The report denounces the project, as did Mr. Trump in his September speech announcing the commission.
With only days left in office Trump manages to squeeze in just one final insult to liberals.
what an immense amount of historical abuse.

this bullshit talks about history and historiography as if professional historians (and those dreaded college professors) haven't been honestly appraising the legacy of slavery since, er, 1900?

the right-wing really love to rewrite and abuse history whilst blaming everything on the left, don't they? how many times have we seen this play now? ah yes, a fifth column of progressives that are seeking to undermine society ... we must bundle together for strength, bruders!
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6097|eXtreme to the maX
OK but college professors have traditionally been left wing and the level of wokeness and white self-hate really has been becoming out of control lately.

Its every level of education now, even my sister - who works in primary and secondary education and doesn't eat risotto because it may have chicken stock in it - has been wondering how the next generation is going to get anything done, populate the armed services etc.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+794|6676|United States of America
I'm quite confused what these things have to do with each other, if indeed they are true. Saying "college professors" have "traditionally" been left wing is a broad brush. I take that to mean people in the social sciences tend (and therefore history?) to lean more left, though economics is a notable area where there's a sizeable group on the right.

Does any real white person actually have this self-hate? I think I saw a sign that was ridiculed that was like "I'm sorry for being white" or something ridiculous like that, but that doesn't seem to be the mainstream opinion at all. I've not heard anything close to even being ashamed of one's whiteness, but more recognition of the privileges it provides in our society through no effort of one's own.

Lastly, are vegetarians unable to be concerned about the future or something? The issue is so vague that I'm not really sure what the implication is; however, I have come across it before of military recruitment heavily relying upon a crop of poorer people with a lack of prospects.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6097|eXtreme to the maX
Yes, humanities academics have traditionally been left wing, in the UK and Europe at least.

'The Left' have now wrapped themselves up so thoroughly with all this progressive thinking that they can't now get out of it and discuss anything rationally without layering it with white guilt and racism.

My sister is a woke lefty but she sees kids being taught nothing useful and has a friend in the air force who is concerned that there just aren't good candidates applying to be fighter pilots any more.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
uziq
Member
+492|3443

Dilbert_X wrote:

OK but college professors have traditionally been left wing and the level of wokeness and white self-hate really has been becoming out of control lately.

Its every level of education now, even my sister - who works in primary and secondary education and doesn't eat risotto because it may have chicken stock in it - has been wondering how the next generation is going to get anything done, populate the armed services etc.
what have you done to ‘populate the armed forces’? shooting peashooters at paper targets isn’t quite the same thing as joining the ADF and fighting off chinese landing craft, is it dilbert?

what the FUCK are two middle-aged adults who live at home with their parents doing, crowing about ‘the next generation’ populating anything? you absolute losers.

‘college professors have always been left-wing’, i mean really. which ones? the eugenicists at UCL? the dons at oxford? the ecclesiasts and sherry swilling priests at durham? the scots lairds’ sons at st. andrew’s? where are all these ‘traditional’ hotbeds of woke politics?

or perhaps, more to the point in american history, are you trying to suggest the dominant trend in american historiography for MOST of the 20th century wasn’t widely conservative? the most influential take on the abolition of slavery and period of reconstruction was, for most of the 20th c, that reconstruction was a disaster because ‘the blacks over-reached’ or ‘the blacks tried to ruin things’. this was the standard take in history departments from columbia to harvard. there was in fact a huge rear-guard effort, politically motivated, to tip the historical balance this way and to perpetuate the causes of the south and powerful southern interests in just this way: through history texts, lectures, pamphlets and higher education. 

but please. let’s talk some more about how historians have ‘badly erased our history’ with their ‘woke leftism’.

the right-wing are vague on detail and dishonest to their rotten core. including yourself. your capacity for bad faith and selective argument is boundless. YOU yourself regurgitate these politically blinkered takes – ‘slavery wasn’t such a big deal’, ‘slavery wasn’t so bad’, ‘i sincerely doubt america really actually benefitted much from slavery’ – today in 2020. where’d you think all these atrocious takes came from? there’s a venerable tradition of this claptrap ffs.

you are playing with the culture wars claque and joining in with the insipid gossip without having read a single salutary fucking book on these subjects. you don’t know anything about the historiography of this period and can only offer vague stereotypes about ‘woke college professors’. do better. you’re a grown man.

Last edited by uziq (2021-01-18 22:57:49)

uziq
Member
+492|3443

Dilbert_X wrote:

Yes, humanities academics have traditionally been left wing, in the UK and Europe at least.

My sister is a woke lefty but she sees kids being taught nothing useful and has a friend in the air force who is concerned that there just aren't good candidates applying to be fighter pilots any more.
trendy european leftism wasn’t a thing until guilt-ridden germans and exculpatory frenchies started making it cool in the late 1960s and 1970s. and that was its high watermark. hence why cultural conservatives are so fervid about foucault and ‘cultural marxism’.

to make out that french historians or german professors before then were ‘traditionally left wing’ is just hilarious. ah, yes, the college de france and university at heidelberg: those known hotbeds of anti-establishment leftism. lmao hahah. more likely they were full of stuffy scions and ex-nazis/collaborators to be frank with you.

humanities educations pre-1960s were the preserve of the elite, and before that even of the aristocracy. to talk about them being ‘traditionally’ left-wing is hilarious. yeah, mainstream historiography around slavery from abolition through to WW2 wasn’t socialist in nature, let’s put it that way. most american universities and history faculties still had limits on how many jews they’d accept ffs. very WASP. only a small number became theoretically interested in bolshevism/marxism. hardly a country of jean-paul sartre’s or cambridge spies.

i’m alarmed but not surprised that both you and your sister sound like hopeless stereotypes. a teacher whining about how weak her students are and tutting that none of them will become fighter pilots. christ you lot are an utter joke. that proud norman family living in wagga wagga with the extended bloodline in council houses in england and wales. you sad bastards.

Last edited by uziq (2021-01-18 23:54:33)

Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6097|eXtreme to the maX
We've done this all before, do I need to list all the stupid courses undergraduates have to wade through "Why white people are bed" etc, and the inane PhDs people are doing at the gay department at (IIRC) UCL? I think I found "Lesbianism through the dark ages"

My sister is an accountant and business manager BTW, and its the non-norman side of the family which was multi-generation chimney sweeps so there.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
uziq
Member
+492|3443
the above trump ‘project’ is talking broadly about how historians have abused american history. it is a nonsense. a skirmish in the culture wars. 

what PhD students are writing about now in 2020 or even in 1990 is not ‘the discipline of history’ and certainly has nothing to do with how slavery, abolition, reconstruction, etc have been dealt with throughout the 20th century. these topics have been overwhelmingly reactionary, not to say revisionist, in tone. powerful southern senators poured an immense amount of funding into propping up ‘the lost cause’ in history teaching instead. this is a very real current and a very real aspect of the historiography. what the trumper project came out with is historical abuse. it has no bearing on reality whatsoever.

for you to claim ‘humanities has been traditionally left wing’ and talk about some PhD theses from the 21st century is dumb. humanities has long been the preserve of the gentry and monied upper-middle classes. the tenor of its teaching and the atmosphere of its faculties has been donnish, conservative, traditionalist. a few well-meaning or bumbling oxford dons with marxist sympathies in the 1930s or french lecturers in rollnecks in the 1960s do not change the overwhelming material fact that humanities professors and their students have been taken from the top material 15% of society. these are white upper-middle class enclaves. no, humanities has not ‘traditionally been left-wing’ ffs.

Last edited by uziq (2021-01-19 00:11:39)

Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6097|eXtreme to the maX
Pretty sure academia has been champagne socialist for a little while.

America is a bit different, it does seem to be composed of a good few people who compete to outdo each other in their radical leftism, coupled with some fairly aggressive student factions.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
uziq
Member
+492|3443
their influence is totally overstated by the overwhelming rump of conservative opinion who DO hold the seats of power and university tenures. a few ‘radical feminist’ theorists are not upending the american college system.

history as a discipline is in the main conservative. it’s almost antiquarian at times. most prestigious US universities are nearer to being victorian than being rad woke lesbian feminist in outlook. do you really think the ivied halls of princeton or yale are going full hog for ‘woke leftism’?

we are talking about professional historians here. not loud undergraduates who wave placards about for a summer in their sophomore year and feel very important. students or even brainy PhD graduate students do not control the academic disciplines. they are occupied by mostly old white men with the opinions you’d expect.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard