It's a little more complicated than that dilbert, read the article and click the links. But all things considered I don't think it's quite fair to portray journalism as a deeply racist career environment if the diversity range deviates some mere 3% from the national average - clearly that indicates steps are & have been taken.
It's the quota & percentages discussion that rubs me the wrong way though. The goal should simply be that people of various backgrounds can integrate in a new work environment and develop their skills without being hindered because of sexual or racial differences. How much % of a workforce is of X background should only be a concern if the makeup is at extremes, which doesn't seem to be the case...
It's the quota & percentages discussion that rubs me the wrong way though. The goal should simply be that people of various backgrounds can integrate in a new work environment and develop their skills without being hindered because of sexual or racial differences. How much % of a workforce is of X background should only be a concern if the makeup is at extremes, which doesn't seem to be the case...