vanmani
Unintentionally Verbose
+26|6868|Australia
haha. You guys have no idea what "coding" means. Sorry.

The engine is also part of BF2s "coding". What you mean to say, without any evidence to back it up, is that it is not the core graphics/physics/networking of the BF2 engine which is at fault.

To the person that said the engine had absolutely no faults, you are clearly ignorant. NASA's mission critical stuff is considered to be the most perfect "code" we can get, and even that stuff has 1 or 2 errors every release. Most normal large scale commercial releases will have several thousand, and BF2 is certainly no exception there.

When they patch BF2, they are usually also making changes to the engine, even if the majority of the visible changes you see are only in the game objects. For BF2142 they had to make many changes to the engine to suit the new game. Just as other vendors have to make many changes to Havok, Doom3, Serious Sam etc. etc. engines when they make a new game using them.

It's really more like a starting point, and a pre-defined structure, to use.

1.4 is the most thoroughly tested and deliberated patch that has ever been released for BF2, hopefully we will all be pleasantly surprised at how good it is, when it comes.
=MCHD= arush5268d
Member
+46|6778|Houston, TX
1.4 is a hoax
=MCHD= arush5268d
Member
+46|6778|Houston, TX

vanmani wrote:

haha. You guys have no idea what "coding" means. Sorry.

The engine is also part of BF2s "coding". What you mean to say, without any evidence to back it up, is that it is not the core graphics/physics/networking of the BF2 engine which is at fault.

To the person that said the engine had absolutely no faults, you are clearly ignorant. NASA's mission critical stuff is considered to be the most perfect "code" we can get, and even that stuff has 1 or 2 errors every release. Most normal large scale commercial releases will have several thousand, and BF2 is certainly no exception there.

When they patch BF2, they are usually also making changes to the engine, even if the majority of the visible changes you see are only in the game objects. For BF2142 they had to make many changes to the engine to suit the new game. Just as other vendors have to make many changes to Havok, Doom3, Serious Sam etc. etc. engines when they make a new game using them.

It's really more like a starting point, and a pre-defined structure, to use.

1.4 is the most thoroughly tested and deliberated patch that has ever been released for BF2, hopefully we will all be pleasantly surprised at how good it is, when it comes.
Well put.  EA/DICE is obviously trying to make this patch work and avoid a lot of the problems with previous patches, so I give them credit for that, and I will assume that that is why the patch release date keeps getting pushed back.  It'll come eventually...
cohen1976
Member
+14|7044
any signs it wil come today??
ThePunisher_ITA_
Member
+59|6879

cohen1976 wrote:

any signs it wil come today??
I think next Tuesday as usual...
cohen1976
Member
+14|7044
i just saw this on clanforge

BattleField 2 - Master issues
Aug 25 2006 01:10:44 by Killing
There is currently an issue with the BattleField 2 master which will prevent ANY ranked server from being started.
If your servers running, don't restart it or it will fail.
If your server is already down then you can create yourself an "UNranked" profile in ClanForge using the "New" button under ClanForge -> Profiles. Then switch your server to this profile via Servers -> Edit.


WTF is this?? great not only we crash 6 times a day but now ranked server dont start up anymore.....
ThePunisher_ITA_
Member
+59|6879

belevre wrote:

http://forum.eagames.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=27827&sid=1a848cccd05eb3c8316fce47728bb3be

soon
Damn... Their excuses are really pathetic.
JdeFalconr
Lex Luthor, King of Australia
+72|6818|Sammamish, WA

=MCHD= arush5268d wrote:

vanmani wrote:

haha. You guys have no idea what "coding" means. Sorry.

The engine is also part of BF2s "coding". What you mean to say, without any evidence to back it up, is that it is not the core graphics/physics/networking of the BF2 engine which is at fault.

To the person that said the engine had absolutely no faults, you are clearly ignorant. NASA's mission critical stuff is considered to be the most perfect "code" we can get, and even that stuff has 1 or 2 errors every release. Most normal large scale commercial releases will have several thousand, and BF2 is certainly no exception there.

When they patch BF2, they are usually also making changes to the engine, even if the majority of the visible changes you see are only in the game objects. For BF2142 they had to make many changes to the engine to suit the new game. Just as other vendors have to make many changes to Havok, Doom3, Serious Sam etc. etc. engines when they make a new game using them.

It's really more like a starting point, and a pre-defined structure, to use.

1.4 is the most thoroughly tested and deliberated patch that has ever been released for BF2, hopefully we will all be pleasantly surprised at how good it is, when it comes.
Well put.  EA/DICE is obviously trying to make this patch work and avoid a lot of the problems with previous patches, so I give them credit for that, and I will assume that that is why the patch release date keeps getting pushed back.  It'll come eventually...
I agree, and I'm very glad to see EA working hard to make this a good release. However I think it's too little too late. They should have put forth the same efforts and quality control on all their previous patches and, more importantly, the original game release. While I acknowledge that such software programs are incredibly complex and have thousands of lines of code to go through EA/DICE are professional game companies and should operate in a professional manner. Releasing products that are buggy and incomplete to the same extent BF2 and its patches are is not a professional move despite how it's the norm for game companies these days (remember, it didn't used to be this way with games). Some bugs, yes I can understand. But this many bugs that have gone unresolved for this long is silly. 1.3 with its server crash bug shouldn't have even gotten out the door! It took how many...five or six...patches to even attempt a fix for the red/blue name bug, a bug that severely affects gameplay. Complexity of code is one thing but this is out of hand; in my opinion at this point DICE has no excuse.

Last edited by JdeFalconr (2006-08-25 09:41:49)

ThePunisher_ITA_
Member
+59|6879

JdeFalconr wrote:

=MCHD= arush5268d wrote:

vanmani wrote:

haha. You guys have no idea what "coding" means. Sorry.

The engine is also part of BF2s "coding". What you mean to say, without any evidence to back it up, is that it is not the core graphics/physics/networking of the BF2 engine which is at fault.

To the person that said the engine had absolutely no faults, you are clearly ignorant. NASA's mission critical stuff is considered to be the most perfect "code" we can get, and even that stuff has 1 or 2 errors every release. Most normal large scale commercial releases will have several thousand, and BF2 is certainly no exception there.

When they patch BF2, they are usually also making changes to the engine, even if the majority of the visible changes you see are only in the game objects. For BF2142 they had to make many changes to the engine to suit the new game. Just as other vendors have to make many changes to Havok, Doom3, Serious Sam etc. etc. engines when they make a new game using them.

It's really more like a starting point, and a pre-defined structure, to use.

1.4 is the most thoroughly tested and deliberated patch that has ever been released for BF2, hopefully we will all be pleasantly surprised at how good it is, when it comes.
Well put.  EA/DICE is obviously trying to make this patch work and avoid a lot of the problems with previous patches, so I give them credit for that, and I will assume that that is why the patch release date keeps getting pushed back.  It'll come eventually...
I agree, and I'm very glad to see EA working hard to make this a good release. However I think it's too little too late. They should have put forth the same efforts and quality control on all their previous patches and, more importantly, the original game release. While I acknowledge that such software programs are incredibly complex and have thousands of lines of code to go through EA/DICE are professional game companies and should operate in a professional manner. Releasing products that are buggy and incomplete to the same extent BF2 and its patches are is not a professional move despite how it's the norm for game companies these days (remember, it didn't used to be this way with games). Some bugs, yes I can understand. But this many bugs that have gone unresolved for this long is silly. 1.3 with its server crash bug shouldn't have even gotten out the door! It took how many...five or six...patches to even attempt a fix for the red/blue name bug, a bug that severely affects gameplay. Complexity of code is one thing but this is out of hand; in my opinion at this point DICE has no excuse.
Do you really think they are working hard on the patch? :rotfl:
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6744
I think we sould have gotten a 1.31 a week after 1.3's release instead of a 1.4 three months after 1.3's release. It is odd how 1.2 had less bugs, and less major ones than 1.3 but it got a hotfix instead of 1.3. I think EA is run by Dick cheney and Halliburton.
ThePunisher_ITA_
Member
+59|6879

doctastrangelove1964 wrote:

I think we sould have gotten a 1.31 a week after 1.3's release instead of a 1.4 three months after 1.3's release. It is odd how 1.2 had less bugs, and less major ones than 1.3 but it got a hotfix instead of 1.3. I think EA is run by Dick cheney and Halliburton.
I totally quote. It is absurd the release of a "patch" like 1.3 without an hotfix in the few next days. +1 man.
=WTE=MasteRMattY
Member
+1|6997
Ea are basicaly saying with the patch- C U N ext T uesday each week
CLEVERLITTLETROJAN
I killed you,you just don't know it yet
+18|6890|birmingham,uk
i can handle the bugs i have got used to them the only thing i 1t the patch for is the map road to jalalalalalalalbadass it looks soooooooooooooooo sweet
~Solar~Fire~
Member
+45|6924|Austin, TX
Lets be clear about the real reason the patch has been delayed: EA has basically forgotten about BF2. Why spend money paying programmers to fix BF2 when 2142 is right around the corner? The 1.4 patch isn't going to give them $50. As 2142 gets closer to being ready for release, 1.4 slips further back into obscurity.

EA dances on a very fine line of keeping people just barely interested in buying their games, they just do the bare minimum. Its well known that they treat their developers like utter crap with harsh deadlines and insane amounts of forced overtime. Theres also their exclusive hold on sports games. I don't need to go on about their hostility towards the modding community. Read it all on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Arts#Criticism

EA is a corporate monster, their only aim is to make things just barely good enough for people to buy. Mark my words: BF2142 won't really be much better than BF2. It'll basically just be new uniforms guns and maps with giant machines that walk instead of tanks. It'll be just barely enough to convince us all to buy it, complete with crap patches and stupid 'expansion packs'

So basically, 1.4 and BF2142 will be the same, except you'll have to pay $50 for one of them.
JdeFalconr
Lex Luthor, King of Australia
+72|6818|Sammamish, WA
Do you really think they are working hard on the patch? :rotfl:
Don't forget that 2142 is being made by a separate DICE team than the group that worked on and (I would imagine) is working on BF2 and its patches.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7042|Cambridge (UK)

JdeFalconr wrote:

Do you really think they are working hard on the patch? :rotfl:
Don't forget that 2142 is being made by a separate DICE team than the group that worked on and (I would imagine) is working on BF2 and its patches.
As far as I was aware, 2142 was developed by the same team that developed BF2.
You are right that the patches are worked on by a different team though I believe.
brickZ28
Master of Puppets
+15|7013|IL

~Solar~Fire~ wrote:

Lets be clear about the real reason the patch has been delayed: EA has basically forgotten about BF2. Why spend money paying programmers to fix BF2 when 2142 is right around the corner? The 1.4 patch isn't going to give them $50. As 2142 gets closer to being ready for release, 1.4 slips further back into obscurity.

EA dances on a very fine line of keeping people just barely interested in buying their games, they just do the bare minimum. Its well known that they treat their developers like utter crap with harsh deadlines and insane amounts of forced overtime. Theres also their exclusive hold on sports games. I don't need to go on about their hostility towards the modding community. Read it all on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Arts#Criticism

EA is a corporate monster, their only aim is to make things just barely good enough for people to buy. Mark my words: BF2142 won't really be much better than BF2. It'll basically just be new uniforms guns and maps with giant machines that walk instead of tanks. It'll be just barely enough to convince us all to buy it, complete with crap patches and stupid 'expansion packs'

So basically, 1.4 and BF2142 will be the same, except you'll have to pay $50 for one of them.
i couldnt agree more sir!!!!!
TuRfYMaN
Member
+7|6958|Ohio, USA
I'm just curious, how many of you here actually coded the engine or the content?

... 

Yea, I didn't think so... 

How can you say its perfect.  You have no idea.  And I'd bet a majority of you, (no offense to any programmers here) couldn't even read C++/Java or any other language.

I'm sure the engine has bugs as well as the rest of whatever code that BF2 is executing.  All major projects involving thousands of lines of code have bugs. So I highly doubt you can say "I doubt there will be no major bugs in 2142", you just don't know...

-Tom

Last edited by TuRfYMaN (2006-08-25 23:10:47)

ThePunisher_ITA_
Member
+59|6879

~Solar~Fire~ wrote:

Lets be clear about the real reason the patch has been delayed: EA has basically forgotten about BF2. Why spend money paying programmers to fix BF2 when 2142 is right around the corner? The 1.4 patch isn't going to give them $50. As 2142 gets closer to being ready for release, 1.4 slips further back into obscurity.

EA dances on a very fine line of keeping people just barely interested in buying their games, they just do the bare minimum. Its well known that they treat their developers like utter crap with harsh deadlines and insane amounts of forced overtime. Theres also their exclusive hold on sports games. I don't need to go on about their hostility towards the modding community. Read it all on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Arts#Criticism

EA is a corporate monster, their only aim is to make things just barely good enough for people to buy. Mark my words: BF2142 won't really be much better than BF2. It'll basically just be new uniforms guns and maps with giant machines that walk instead of tanks. It'll be just barely enough to convince us all to buy it, complete with crap patches and stupid 'expansion packs'

So basically, 1.4 and BF2142 will be the same, except you'll have to pay $50 for one of them.
Man... you MUST have a +1 from me!
BandoIruka
Member
+1|6770
There are other issues involved that the EA programmers have to deal with. So if 1.4 comes out terrible, I won't blame them.

http://ea-spouse.livejournal.com/274.html

Last edited by BandoIruka (2006-08-25 23:53:17)

Janysc
Member
+59|6959|Norway

=MCHD= arush5268d wrote:

1.4 is a hoax
Worse. 1.4 IS BF2142 !
Towelly
It's A State Of Mind
+399|6867|Your attic
1.4 is mythology
SGT_Dicklewicz
Member
+33|6901
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
=TBG=Zoton
my mum says i'm cool
+22|6931|Australia
i heard from a reliable source that EA said they will release it when people stop posting stupid threads asking when it will be released
SGT_Dicklewicz
Member
+33|6901
^^^^^^^^^^^


I did hear the same thing

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard