Poll

Should Infantry Only be Available for BF2142?

Yes63%63% - 84
No36%36% - 48
Total: 132
FFLink
There is.
+1,380|6929|Devon, England
Yeh, just tell me what you think.

I think it should, as there are still going to be people who will complain about some vehicles, and will end up making servers that state "no vehicles or you get banned". Surely Dice should just make this game mode available in the beginning rather than puttng it in 13 months or so after release.
daffytag
cheese-it!
+104|6813
Why not? You dont have to play infabtry only if you dont want to, but having the option means you can have a bit of variation in gameplay.
fierce
I love [fiSh]
+167|6806
Infantry Only is and was the most and longest demanded feature for BF2. DICE maybe make mistakes but i think they're not dumb. Therefore i guess there'll be an Infantry Only Mode included.

If it won't have this game mode, i guess there'll be a lot less customers including my clan.

Some of the BF2142 vehicles are just to spacy, like the hovercraft "drive-and-slide-on-ice" tank etc.

Last edited by fierce (2006-08-16 02:52:03)

pt_22
Member
+9|6731
go play counter strike... thats what your asking for.

sorry to sound crude, but battlefield is battlefield because of tanks, helis and jets... if it wasnt for them it would be just like the 100 odd other fps.
FFLink
There is.
+1,380|6929|Devon, England

pt_22 wrote:

go play counter strike... thats what your asking for.

sorry to sound crude, but battlefield is battlefield because of tanks, helis and jets... if it wasnt for them it would be just like the 100 odd other fps.
no.

let me find something i posted a while back about your type...

here we go:

FFLink13 wrote:

and for those that say "play CSS", BF2 is a completely different type of fps, like none i've played before (maybe rainbow 6). The whole accuracy thing makes it way better than any normal fps, as 3-4 shots kill with a standard machine gun. And, BF2 has all squad and teamwork capabilities that also differ it from any other fps. The IO will see alot more teamwork i reckon.
so

Last edited by FFLink13 (2006-08-16 02:54:51)

pt_22
Member
+9|6731
I think they should make a mod for it where there are enough vehicles for EVERYONE!! that way we can all do what we brought battlefield for.
fierce
I love [fiSh]
+167|6806

pt_22 wrote:

go play counter strike... thats what your asking for.
I still don't get it why people complain about a feature you don't need to use. If you don't like Infantry Only => don't play it. This feature makes the game even more versatile and improves the game experience.

Is the average IQ on the BF2 community really so low?
pt_22
Member
+9|6731
i don't, and i wont post in a forum that is talking about infantry only..

but this is debating wether or not Dice should spend valuble coding time making a silly infantry mod for the game....

when in the majority of battlefield players eyes they would rather have dice create a game without crashes and bugs... Hence focus on the point of the game (total warfare) and leave the little infantry skirmishes to other game developers.
voltage
Member
+46|7078|Sweden
BF2142 should have a Dogtag-mode where the only available weapon is the knife, so that players can collect dog tags.
jkohlc
2142th Whore
+214|6764|Singapore
i think EA should make a map specifically for infantrys and the mode should be on both BF2 and BF2142
Delphy
Member
+45|6823|Bristol, UK
Infantry only is a cop-out. BF is about the whole theatre of war.
panderiz
Member
+32|7004

pt_22 wrote:

i don't, and i wont post in a forum that is talking about infantry only..

but this is debating wether or not Dice should spend valuble coding time making a silly infantry mod for the game....

when in the majority of battlefield players eyes they would rather have dice create a game without crashes and bugs... Hence focus on the point of the game (total warfare) and leave the little infantry skirmishes to other game developers.
haha no wonder, your one of the WORST inf players going around.

also, do you think the inf only setting requires many changes? ah no, just the smaller maps without anything bigger than a jeep!
panderiz
Member
+32|7004

Delphy wrote:

Infantry only is a cop-out. BF is about the whole theatre of war.
who are all you nubs that think your opinion of what the game should be, are you the developers?

this will be probably the most popular setting going around.

I agree that the game would be better as a 'whole theatre of war' but it was hardly that to begin with, and with all the retards that play having such a large impact on maps that become TOTALLY one sided when for example: Sharqi as US and a bunch of nubs take your teams heli repeatedly and proceed to waste it causing the MEC heli to proceed to flog the 32 players on the US team, spawn camping the Tv station.

made my point, go play wow emo's
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|6868|Washington, DC

Because we all know insulting someone with uncreative things like 'emo' and 'nub' is the best way to get your point across -_-

I bought BF2 for the scope of all the fighting. That's probably what everyone else did. BF vets said "oh sweet, BF gameplay with all sorts of cool features!". New players said "omfg i can drive a tank and plane omfg1!1111!!!". Nobody said "vehicles are for noobs im gonna go infantry all the way instead of picking up this game called counter-strike source". They only started bitching when they got owned by vehicles because their team sucked.

Last edited by ExecutionerStyle (2006-08-16 03:57:18)

RPGBait
Member
+1|6702|Melb. AU

Delphy wrote:

Infantry only is a cop-out. BF is about the whole theatre of war.
I wouldn't call it a cop out, but instead it's just another aspect of war. The reality of war is there isn't always enough materiel to go around.  Good soldiers make do with what they've got.

pt_22 wrote:

but this is debating wether or not Dice should spend valuble coding time making a silly infantry mod for the game....

when in the majority of battlefield players eyes they would rather have dice create a game without crashes and bugs... Hence focus on the point of the game (total warfare) and leave the little infantry skirmishes to other game developers.
It's really up to DICE to decide if they're willing to wear the cost of developing customised mods to suit the 'whiners'.  Yes, sorry if that offends, but if you really hate the game, the map, or whatever then don't play.  If I got worked up every time I got my ass filled with shrapnel, I'd never enjoy it.  Face it, some players are better than others. You have good days, and days when you get your privates sent in a different direction to the rest of your infantry. Get over it, or be constructive, but moaning about it won't solve anything, though it'll make you sound pretty stupid and immature. Personally though, I'd rather they focus on the core and producing tools to help the community to make the game greater than it already is.

fierce wrote:

If you don't like Infantry Only => don't play it. This feature makes the game even more versatile and improves the game experience.
I played on Karkand the other day where everyone (except for a couple of vehicle whores) played by the rules and used knife, pistol or paddle only.  It was surreal, and a great deal of fun.  I earned my basic pistol in a hurry (I was getting impatient), and it made for an entirely different style of play.  I could just imagine this would only be a better scenario in a kind of office building scenario, with NPC's that need to be protected from friendly fire.  Anyway, it was fun, different, not why I normally get on and play, but I'll probably do it again just for a change of pace.

What I'd really like to see is a whole new realm of customisation.  Everything from the vehicles allowed or disallowed, to limiting a game to knife only, or pistol only, or allowing games to be set up so that a handful of players could spawn on one side with a weapon/vehicular advantage, with the other team loaded simply with ground-pounders.  Situations where protection of vital assets or a civilian population is a primary mission goal, that sort of thing.  Adds an element of realism, risk and reward that is missing from nearly all FPS's, including Battlefield. 

Back to PT's issue of DICE 'wasting time', I think getting the game right is most important.  leave the modding to the community that seem to be doing so well adding their owns support to the game, but adding lashings of customisable elements so that each time you visit a map, it can be played very differently.

Sorry for the long first post.  Lots to say after lurking here for a while ;-)

Last edited by RPGBait (2006-08-16 04:03:36)

Samtheman53
Banned
+346|6933|UK
No.
Cbass
Kick His Ass!
+371|6932|Howell, Mi USA
Keep IO mode out of both games. The Bf series is about vehicles and infantry

<quote 1002 times now> "go play counter strike" </that>
https://bf3s.com/sigs/bb53a522780eff5b30ba3252d44932cc2f5b8c4f.png
FFLink
There is.
+1,380|6929|Devon, England

Cbass wrote:

Keep IO mode out of both games. The Bf series is about vehicles and infantry

<quote 1002 times now> "go play counter strike" </that>

FFLink13 wrote:

and for those that say "play CSS", BF2 is a completely different type of fps, like none i've played before (maybe rainbow 6). The whole accuracy thing makes it way better than any normal fps, as 3-4 shots kill with a standard machine gun. And, BF2 has all squad and teamwork capabilities that also differ it from any other fps. The IO will see alot more teamwork i reckon.
Longbow
Member
+163|6884|Odessa, Ukraine

Cbass wrote:

Keep IO mode out of both games. The Bf series is about vehicles and infantry

<quote 1002 times now> "go play counter strike" </that>
+1 for you , completely agree
Cbass
Kick His Ass!
+371|6932|Howell, Mi USA
Dude, yes they are 2 diffrent games. take vehicles out of the BF series. what do u have? an average shooter like CS. KEEP THEM DIFFRENT!

Last edited by Cbass (2006-08-16 13:23:27)

https://bf3s.com/sigs/bb53a522780eff5b30ba3252d44932cc2f5b8c4f.png
kn0ckahh
Member
+98|6976|netherlands, sweet lake city
pfff why not if ppl want to play on aiming skill why should it be banned for the game ... its not like you have to play infantry
genius_man16
Platinum Star whore
+365|6916|Middle of nowhere

fierce wrote:

pt_22 wrote:

go play counter strike... thats what your asking for.
I still don't get it why people complain about a feature you don't need to use. If you don't like Infantry Only => don't play it. This feature makes the game even more versatile and improves the game experience.

Is the average IQ on the BF2 community really so low?
what's IQ?
Longbow
Member
+163|6884|Odessa, Ukraine
skilled infantry player know how to deal with vehicles on public servers . n00bs ( claiming themselfs t3h-Uber-pwnzors ) complain ..
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6999

pt_22 wrote:

go play counter strike... thats what your asking for.

sorry to sound crude, but battlefield is battlefield because of tanks, helis and jets... if it wasnt for them it would be just like the 100 odd other fps.
You sir are a retard.  Go play with your sack.
SoC./Omega
Member
+122|6779|Omaha, Nebraska!
Well, 2142 would be good with it but i dont think as many people will buy 2142. But if i get it ya it would be a nice addition.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard