Is this World War 3? Be honest, England and the usa are only officially involved in Iraq.... but, would you class this as WW3? btw, i HAVE been drinking..... so dont grill me ok lol
No, but its ok. This type of hype is all over the place. It would've been WWIII a while ago but no one really cares to be frank. If it were to be WWIII, i have a feelling that Bush would love teo be the new Churchill...ok Truman/ Roosevelt
Who's the enemy? Terrorism is an abstract noun, you can't combat an abstract noun. If you can name every person we are fighting against in under, maybe, 5 words, then we can start calling it a war. At most
dude...i think the exact same thing....thats creepySpearhead wrote:
Who's the enemy? Terrorism is an abstract noun, you can't combat an abstract noun. If you can name every person we are fighting against in under, maybe, 5 words, then we can start calling it a war. At most
You can in America.Spearhead wrote:
Who's the enemy? Terrorism is an abstract noun, you can't combat an abstract noun. If you can name every person we are fighting against in under, maybe, 5 words, then we can start calling it a war. At most
Is EVERY single fight worse than a playground scuffle going to send everyone up in arms about "World War 3"?
I hope not. Otherwise things will get annoying.
No, this is just whities vs darkies.
Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it
the evil doersSpearhead wrote:
Who's the enemy? Terrorism is an abstract noun, you can't combat an abstract noun. If you can name every person we are fighting against in under, maybe, 5 words, then we can start calling it a war. At most
a couple years from now we're going to be looking back at this and say: screw Nixon, why the hell didn't this guy resign?King_County_Downy wrote:
No, this is just whities vs darkies.
lolGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
the evil doersSpearhead wrote:
Who's the enemy? Terrorism is an abstract noun, you can't combat an abstract noun. If you can name every person we are fighting against in under, maybe, 5 words, then we can start calling it a war. At most
I just got robbed, we have to invade St. Pete because they harbor evil doers
Yup, it's world war 3. Seek cover and hide there for the next 10 years. Then it'll all be ok again. Just watch out for radioactive mutant survivors.
The war on terror is the most serious and dangerous threat to all our lives, we all need to panic!
The war on terror is the most serious and dangerous threat to all our lives, we all need to panic!
I thought it was "The axis of evil"?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
the evil doersSpearhead wrote:
Who's the enemy? Terrorism is an abstract noun, you can't combat an abstract noun. If you can name every person we are fighting against in under, maybe, 5 words, then we can start calling it a war. At most
Last edited by UnOriginalNuttah (2006-08-11 17:45:52)
how many "play ground scuffles" have you seen with a death tool of over 3000 people?Cactusfist wrote:
You can in America.Spearhead wrote:
Who's the enemy? Terrorism is an abstract noun, you can't combat an abstract noun. If you can name every person we are fighting against in under, maybe, 5 words, then we can start calling it a war. At most
Is EVERY single fight worse than a playground scuffle going to send everyone up in arms about "World War 3"?
I hope not. Otherwise things will get annoying.
World War 3. LOL.
werd, we would actually have be fighting a legitimate enemy....such as the Iranian, Syrian, N. Korean military. It would have to be legitimate enemies for it to really be a third world war....will that war come...essentially yes, especially if everyone in the M.E. keeps fucking with Isreal.Spearhead wrote:
Who's the enemy? Terrorism is an abstract noun, you can't combat an abstract noun. If you can name every person we are fighting against in under, maybe, 5 words, then we can start calling it a war. At most