ShotYourSix
Boldly going nowhere...
+196|6730|Las Vegas
At first glance I was not sure what to think but it's really growing on me (the interior is odd, hope they refine it more).  My first car was a 1968 Camaro so needless to say I am in love with Camaros.  Anyway, they have unveiled it as a concept but it sounds like something very similar to this car could soon be in production.  I'd drive it.....that first pic is one sexy beast!

https://img131.imageshack.us/img131/2673/camaro2gj9.jpg

https://img106.imageshack.us/img106/7408/camarodd4.jpg

https://img164.imageshack.us/img164/1367/camaro1ni3.jpg

https://img146.imageshack.us/img146/8233/camaro5cm4.jpg

https://img106.imageshack.us/img106/2211/camaro6oy5.jpg

https://img231.imageshack.us/img231/6831/camaro3zy8.jpg

https://img146.imageshack.us/img146/6249/camaro4zc6.jpg

The car is 186.2 inches long and rides on a 110.5-inch wheelbase. The wheels are 21s at the front and 22s at the rear, shod with monster 275/30 front and 305/30 rear tires, which should be able to corral the 400 horses from the LS2 6.0-liter V-8 engine powering through a six-speed manual transmission. The show car has a cobbled together chassis with an all-independent suspension, but if it makes it into production, it will use the so-called Zeta Lite architecture that will be shared with Holden in Australia. The good news for GM is that the architecture--while hardly cutting edge--is far more sophisticated than the live-axle Mustang. Insiders say that a $20,000 base model production car could use an inexpensive V-8 (the LS2 would come in a costlier model), so a V-6 version would be offered only to make the car easier to insure. The real car would have smaller wheels, but the overall diameter of the tires wouldn't be much changed. GM vice-chairman and product czar Bob Lutz apparently loves it and joked on the show stand "all I have to do is persuade this man"--referring to GM CEO Rick Wagoner--"to pay for it."

Last edited by ShotYourSix (2006-08-10 14:16:56)

Darkfire
Helping you help yourself
+34|6489| Texas
hmm its interesting but i dont care for the interior design at all
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6579|Mountains of NC

nice, very nice - I hate to be the mechanic on this
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
Tripp
I wanna be on you
+116|6538|So Cal
this may not be a camaro, but it's very close to starting production.  It's my stepdads project www.dimoramotorcar.com
lagerfool
Member
+23|6776|SE Virgina
doughnuts on your lawn!!!!!

Last edited by lagerfool (2006-08-10 14:17:28)

S3v3N
lolwut?
+685|6529|Montucky
I'd buy it if i had 79,000.00$ to spend on a kick ass car.. finally GM jumps on the bang wagon by taking designs of the classic muscle car and smashing it together with the futuristic design of tomorrow..
USAFDude_1988
Will fly for food.
+120|6520|Daytona Beach, FL
Hot damn that's sexy!... The interior is kinda ridiculous though.

Detroit > Import

Last edited by USAFDude_1988 (2006-08-10 15:46:57)

S3v3N
lolwut?
+685|6529|Montucky
old muscle cars > anything now

pre 1970 FTW!!!
thechosen1
Member
+7|6518|Austin, Tx

[1FR]S3v3N wrote:

old muscle cars > anything now

pre 1970 FTW!!!
technology ftw
ez2kill
Member
+2|6484
Way for GM to finally join Dodge and Ford!!!  But at least its not a 4 door auto-trans(Charger).  I'm a mustang guy and I have to admit this car is damn sexy.  Better not make it too expensive or I'll just go get a vet!!!

As for the interior... they will change that for production.
l41e
Member
+677|6659

Outside = l33t. Inside = wtf?
revolution.inc
Pass
+35|6782|Phoenix, Az
I thought camaro production stopped in late 04.
thechosen1
Member
+7|6518|Austin, Tx
'02 was the "last" year for the f-body.
HOLLYWOOD=_=FTW=_=
Member
+31|6563
that makes me happy in my pants
Miller
IT'S MILLER TIME!
+271|6767|United States of America
It looks almost like the new mustangs. You can see the resemblance.
gburndred
tiga tiga tiga tiga tiga woods ya'll
+95|6650|Calgary,AB,Canada
I'd take it to the race track, get on the 1/4 mile and race some people.
ikillyou9090
Member
+24|6559
thats pretty nice i must say, i think the interior is actually pretty cool, futuristic, you know what i mean?

but holy fuck that thing is gunna go, 6.0L? 21" and 22" inch tires wowww

that vs. a brand new mustang wood be a murder, then rape then raped again.
OmniDeath
~
+726|6655

i think gm has the right idea, but even though its damn sexy, i still think its a little too futuristic and not enough old school. doge has the right idea with the challenger.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/AUTOS/funonwhee … index.html
0ktane
Negative Ping
+55|6778|Arizona
It's nice definently...but those pics still concept, will be different when finally released.  Aggressive, wish it looked totally like that though
Sgt.Kyle
Kyle
+48|6494|P-way, NJ
I think pontiac need to bring back the firebird,and hell yea they need to bring back the old cars,now a days the new cars look like shit.

Last edited by Sgt.Kyle (2006-08-10 19:39:20)

ShotYourSix
Boldly going nowhere...
+196|6730|Las Vegas

Miller wrote:

It looks almost like the new mustangs. You can see the resemblance.
Not really getting the mustang vibe, but there is no mistaking those classic Camaro lines.

https://img224.imageshack.us/img224/102/camaro2do9.jpg
https://img131.imageshack.us/img131/8379/camaro68ju3.jpg
ikillyou9090
Member
+24|6559
Ill take number 2 and number 1.

but i prefer Number 2.

because old school is good. and much nicer looking
gburndred
tiga tiga tiga tiga tiga woods ya'll
+95|6650|Calgary,AB,Canada
The bodys of ford cars are alright, like the new mustang. I prefer GM or Chev. If i had the money i'd go for style of the car. Definetly older styles are better looking
ikillyou9090
Member
+24|6559
ill take a 95 mustang gt please.

last of the 5.0L ... tear...

or a 92' if you love me.
Fatman
=cREE=
+11|6646
how can you read the dash?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard