BF2S Forums What do you think of Cheney/Bush/Rumsfeld?

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

My guess is that most American BF2 players skew to the right and will vote positively, and that the vast majority of non-Americans will vote negatively.

You'd be incorrect. There are few people left in the US that actually support the president.

I'm one of those people.

Bush Administration FTW.

Proud of em'.

Last edited by BigmacK192 (2006-08-08 11:21:09)

American and think they are evil.

they make osama bin laden look like a grade school bully

american.  Mostly evil and by evil I mean greedy.

not american - good, hey he gave us 1000 night vision goggles for free!!!!!

Wasder wrote:

I voted Evil, but in my opinion only Cheney and Rumsfeld are really evil, Bush is just a dumb puppet in their hands.

That would explain why Bush can't talk.  Uncle Dick's hand is up Bush's ass. 

M1-Lightning wrote:

There's nothing evil about them and no one in the world can run the execute office alone profficiently. I can't say they have done much good but I certainly wouldn't call them evil. And your pay raise was submitted by Congress. The president doesn't make bills. He only approves or denies what Congress does and makes suggestions. Just like the war in Iraq... Congress is who first submitted it. The president approved it. The Supreme Court authenticated it.

That's an apt description of the process of legislation, but if you believe that's how Washington actually functions, I think you have a lot to learn about the system of funding, power broking, and party allegiances in America. And I've got a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.

I don't think their EVIL.  I mean, you've got to be pretty bad to be evil.  Hitler and Stalin were evil.  Bush?  He might be bad, but he hasn't genocided (?) / murdered millions of people.

voltage wrote:

Rumsfeld is an awesome poet:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor … Id=1761585

funny
evil

Exactly, but liberals dont care about that, its a vietnam situation again. People care about ending the war, not knowing what it is about. It is to LIBERATE COUNTRIES! It is all about giving these people the freedoms America is known for. Protesters that want their loved ones back dont understand that THEY SIGNED UP FOR THE MILITARY. If they were/are going to be killed, It comes with the job. In Vietnam, we pulled out because of a Liberalistic president, Where would we be if Gore was in office during 9/11?

Canadianinvasion wrote:

Exactly, but liberals dont care about that, its a vietnam situation again. People care about ending the war, not knowing what it is about. It is to LIBERATE COUNTRIES! It is all about giving these people the freedoms America is known for. Protesters that want their loved ones back dont understand that THEY SIGNED UP FOR THE MILITARY. If they were/are going to be killed, It comes with the job. In Vietnam, we pulled out because of a Liberalistic president, Where would we be if Gore was in office during 9/11?

Vietnam was never about liberating anyone. It was about trying to secure a french hold over the land in order to deprive the soviets of a potential ally. Every endevour during the cold war was selfishly intended to remove a potential soviet ally.

CyrusTheVirus wrote:

I'm proud of my boys. They have propelled USA towards achieving several goals in difficult circumstances. Free and fair elections in Afghanistan & Iraq. Freedom from the tyranny of Saddam and the Taliban. Osama holed up in some cave, effectively of no use to anyone. I'm guessing they are planning to bring freedom and proper democracy to Cuba and Venezuela in the very near future too. Sterling work team. If only GW could run for a thrid term - we could move on to sorting out Africa.

Agreed