BF2S Forums Air imbalence fix.

okay, well for the person who informed me that the essex isnt a carrier, props to you. However, the J10 isn't a production plane yet, and i think that if i shoot you with a pistol in the head, its going to mess you up. And, lets time i checked, fighter jets can't fly 150 miles an hour. And last time i checked, the f15-c pwns. Also, there arn't many planes that can fly strait up and keep their speed up (well, exept for the f15). So, they need to put f18's on the carrier, as well as add 200 damage to the CWIS on the essex. Oh, btw, last time i checked, the CWIS wasn't manually aimed, and last time i checked, it was for missles, (though it could shoot down planes, as well as when used on that one asw boat, small boats). so now we have established the fact that we can do a lot of things in the game that arnt the same in real life. so gimme some f18's on the carrier.

Oooo very impressive movie.

N meh, perhaps you should stop 'checking' things, the thing with this game is, there has to be a higherarkie (I cant spell for shit, n no I wouldnt know the spell check correction if I fell over it prick), if jets where owned by AA, then we would have people whining about the AA.  Atm its AA whining about planes, you cant please everyone, one of them has to be better than the other, and I feel its best for the planes to have the edge.

Never really thought about what your getting at. Just replace the F-35's entirely on maps where it vs the J-10. Put it up against something thats worth the battle

LT.Victim wrote:

Yup.. a F-18 would be Great on the carrier, but DICE is to lazy to put one there...

And Ya.. Blackhawk Mini-guns need to be un-nerfed..

I like shooting nerf darts at my targets.  Its pretty cool when they stick to the glass to cockpits on attack choppers, because it blocks the pilots view and causes them to lose sight of the chopper Im in...unfortunately the nerf darts dont have much effect on transport vehicles or other players, they just kinda bounce off their helmets.