What would your thoughts be about a merger between EA and Microsoft in which they both contribute to each other's projects?
ea will screw up microsoft, and i am a microsoft lover, DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT THEM MERGING
haha i dont think ea would have much influence over microsoft.
vista might ship with game from ea if they did merge. (minesweeper is replaced by fifa 07 )
vista might ship with game from ea if they did merge. (minesweeper is replaced by fifa 07 )
MS is already screwed up. EA would fit right in.fatmarik wrote:
ea will screw up microsoft, and i am a microsoft lover, DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT THEM MERGING
Would prolly mean when EA/MS however it will be named, will bring out a new windows version and they will prolly patch it like 40 million times cuz it full of bugsnegatorynosirnowayman wrote:
What would your thoughts be about a merger between EA and Microsoft in which they both contribute to each other's projects?
No thnx
My biggest wish: MS buy EA. MS close down EA. Everyone lived happily ever after!
And windows XP hasn't been patched 3459034058 times.. oh wait.. those are "UPDATES"RDMC(2) wrote:
Would prolly mean when EA/MS however it will be named, will bring out a new windows version and they will prolly patch it like 40 million times cuz it full of bugsnegatorynosirnowayman wrote:
What would your thoughts be about a merger between EA and Microsoft in which they both contribute to each other's projects?
No thnx
SO EA would fit right in.
Last edited by [1FR]S3v3N (2006-08-03 13:26:23)
google ftw
No cuz combined they will be the uber bugz0r makers! meaning that will have to ''update'' it 345903405815156511565132156165132164654 times..[1FR]S3v3N wrote:
And windows XP hasn't been patched 3459034058 times.. oh wait.. those are "UPDATES"RDMC(2) wrote:
Would prolly mean when EA/MS however it will be named, will bring out a new windows version and they will prolly patch it like 40 million times cuz it full of bugsnegatorynosirnowayman wrote:
What would your thoughts be about a merger between EA and Microsoft in which they both contribute to each other's projects?
No thnx
SO EA would fit right in.
EA would screw up MS Flight Simulator by making a 747 outperform an F-16.
Nonononono... EA wouldn't make the 747 out perform it intentionally, they'd Nerf the F-16 to the point where a 747 would out maneuver it.USAFDude_1988 wrote:
EA would screw up MS Flight Simulator by making a 747 outperform an F-16.
there is no realistic reason for these two companies to merge...they produce completely different products that are not related to each other, and they are both multi billion (in MS's case trillion) dollar companies that would not gain as much from the merger as they would lose...thus it wont happen, so why ask this question?negatorynosirnowayman wrote:
What would your thoughts be about a merger between EA and Microsoft in which they both contribute to each other's projects?
Microsoft is better than EA x 100. Because, Microsoft doesnt need everything to be patched, i mean it has it updates, but they are not mandatory. Unlike EA (In order to keep playing online).
Microsoft makes the best OS software around, and if you disagree... well i dont know what your somking.
Microsoft makes the best OS software around, and if you disagree... well i dont know what your somking.
teh wordTerrorisT² wrote:
Microsoft is better than EA x 100. Because, Microsoft doesnt need everything to be patched, i mean it has it updates, but they are not mandatory. Unlike EA (In order to keep playing online).
Microsoft makes the best OS software around, and if you disagree... well i dont know what your somking.
So does that mean Windows cds will come with retard helmets ?