DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6602|Finland

With all the Israel-discussion going on, I thought I'd throw an idea out there, just for the sake of debate.

Discuss.


https://img193.imageshack.us/img193/968/mapnewyo5.gif

Last edited by DonFck (2006-07-31 02:29:14)

I need around tree fiddy.
RDMC
Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!
+736|6535|Area 51

DonFck wrote:

With all the Israel-discussion going on, I thought I'd throw an idea out there, just for the sake of debate.

Discuss.


http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/968/mapnewyo5.gif
I don't get it?
i3igpete
Support Specialist
+6|6483
because california is premium land, and to give away such valuable land to the "natives" (jews).  i'd say go for it.  maybe the natives will kill the tree huggers.

Last edited by i3igpete (2006-07-31 02:38:12)

fadedsteve
GOP Sympathizer
+266|6461|Menlo Park, CA
And what illustrious source did you find this map from. . . . some drunk Indian pit boss at the Seven Feathers Casino in Medford, OR??
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6602|Finland

fadedsteve wrote:

And what illustrious source did you find this map from. . . . some drunk Indian pit boss at the Seven Feathers Casino in Medford, OR??
Debate and Serious Talk
I need around tree fiddy.
fadedsteve
GOP Sympathizer
+266|6461|Menlo Park, CA

DonFck wrote:

fadedsteve wrote:

And what illustrious source did you find this map from. . . . some drunk Indian pit boss at the Seven Feathers Casino in Medford, OR??
Debate and Serious Talk
Your point being?? What source did you receive that map from. . . .
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6602|Finland

fadedsteve wrote:

DonFck wrote:

fadedsteve wrote:

And what illustrious source did you find this map from. . . . some drunk Indian pit boss at the Seven Feathers Casino in Medford, OR??
Debate and Serious Talk
Your point being?? What source did you receive that map from. . . .
Photoshop?
I need around tree fiddy.
fadedsteve
GOP Sympathizer
+266|6461|Menlo Park, CA
ahh yes I love photoshop!. . .
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6602|Finland

i3igpete wrote:

because california is premium land, and to give away such valuable land to the "natives" (jews).
+entire western coastline (w. the exception of Alaska)
Correct!

And stupid me who thought this would raise at least a bit discussion..

Last edited by DonFck (2006-07-31 03:04:15)

I need around tree fiddy.
UON
Junglist Massive
+223|6623

i3igpete wrote:

because california is premium land, and to give away such valuable land to the "natives" (jews).  i'd say go for it.  maybe the natives will kill the tree huggers.
Wouldn't the natives be the palistinians?  They would best represent the population being displaced by colonisation.  And I hope you choke to death on your own SUV fumes.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6531
fadedsteve: Asking for a source on a hypothetical proposition, particularly one like this which isn't a realistic plan but rather a visual prompter, is stupid.  It's like if I said "Why don't we bake a chocolate cake" and you said "I'll need a verifiable source for that".
spastic bullet
would like to know if you are on crack
+77|6511|vancouver

Bubbalo wrote:

fadedsteve: Asking for a source on a hypothetical proposition, particularly one like this which isn't a realistic plan but rather a visual prompter, is stupid.  It's like if I said "Why don't we bake a chocolate cake" and you said "I'll need a verifiable source for that".
LOL.  Chocolate cake is an invention of teh liberal media, Bubbalo wake up!  Jeez...

On topic, I give that hypothetical nation about twenty minutes of sovereignty before it gets overrun.  Again.  
kr@cker
Bringin' Sexy Back!
+581|6519|Southeastern USA
they'd still end up fighting the "republica del norte" crowd for it
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6602|Finland

UnOriginalNuttah wrote:

Wouldn't the natives be the palistinians?  They would best represent the population being displaced by colonisation.
Good point.. The natives in the Middle East-situation are in fact the palestinians, however jews can be characterized as a nomad people, with their own country established at their area of origin. So they are natives too..

So in the US there is a group of nomads politically correct called Native Americans. What arguments are there for  and against their own country in their area of origin?
I need around tree fiddy.
kr@cker
Bringin' Sexy Back!
+581|6519|Southeastern USA
I thought the palestinians migrated from the eastern mediterranean, all arabic people were (some still are) pretty much nomadic, for that matter the "native" americans migrated from the siberia side of asia
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6666|NJ
DonFck,

Could you raise a debate with this, not just photoshop a map? Like paint a picture with words too? The first thing that poped into my head was there isn't enough American Indians to fill that much of the world.
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6602|Finland

cpt.fass1 wrote:

DonFck,

Could you raise a debate with this, not just photoshop a map? Like paint a picture with words too? The first thing that poped into my head was there isn't enough American Indians to fill that much of the world.
There were, but somehow the number of native americans has decreased during the past.. ..couple of hundred years.

IMO the picture is enough to raise a conversation..

Last edited by DonFck (2006-07-31 07:03:10)

I need around tree fiddy.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6742|PNW

Might makes right. The Native Americans could never retake land by force.
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6602|Finland

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Might makes right. The Native Americans could never retake land by force.
But a UN resolution could?
I need around tree fiddy.
kr@cker
Bringin' Sexy Back!
+581|6519|Southeastern USA
.........ummmmmm...........yeah
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6602|Finland

But there will be no UN-resolution, because there doesn't seem to exist a sufficient feeling of guilt, as in 1948..
I need around tree fiddy.
Devolant
Member
+3|6607|Sweden
In the other thread that pointed to this one some retarded fuck said that the europeans wiped out the native americans. errrrrr wrong. The europeans started the war with native americans (the brits). The french aswell at some extent. However the war raged on even when the "americans" + french drove out the english cause they were at war at the time.

Europeans took like what.. 10-15% at most... Since we only stayed on the east coast. The Americans in turn moved inwards towards california etc where the spanish and portugese had settled. On the way they encountered loads and loads of natives. You traded with them killed some and eventually you took out 99% of their population cause you were greedy and thought the land belonged to you.

Europeans didn't take out the native americans. "Americans" did. However now all Americans think the land belong to them from origin for some dumb reason. Kind of like Israel believes it is there land from the beginning. When in fact they killed the Judanes and some other folk and took the land from them.

Now you see why america helps israel. They have this special bond. They both killed another civilisation to claim territory.

Last edited by Devolant (2006-07-31 07:13:24)

Erkut.hv
Member
+124|6705|California

DonFck wrote:

But there will be no UN-resolution, because there doesn't seem to exist a sufficient feeling of guilt, as in 1948..
Natives would get overrun by illegals and turned into a fifth world country. The evil white man, sensing weakness, would step in and take it over..... again.

Evil white guys ftw.
kr@cker
Bringin' Sexy Back!
+581|6519|Southeastern USA
you rang?
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|6614
I think I just realized this very moment


most people are stupid

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard