you can still run crossfire on 975x... and SLI (hacked bios). after you crossfire the bottleneck will be the CPU. now core 2 duo proved it kicked AMD's ass in everythingdiglow~Flow wrote:
Yeah but once they combine the 2 its just gonna be a WOW Performance. you gotta think having a combined Gpu with the CPU and i having Crossfire there is gonna be a lot of Ati users and AMD users.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
what has amd and intel got to do w/ graphics? unless you want to run on intergrated their cpus incease framerate in games only because the bottleneck is the cpu, not gpu. filling up the cpu bottleneck will make the bottleneck the gpu and so ondiglow~Flow wrote:
What im trying to say is that gaming ppl like myself are gonna want Graphics in there gaming and AMD is gonna come out on top with this project there doing and ppl with intel are gonna want better Graphics as well so...
LOL!cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
you can still run crossfire on 975x... and SLI (hacked bios). after you crossfire the bottleneck will be the CPU. now core 2 duo proved it kicked AMD's ass in everythingdiglow~Flow wrote:
Yeah but once they combine the 2 its just gonna be a WOW Performance. you gotta think having a combined Gpu with the CPU and i having Crossfire there is gonna be a lot of Ati users and AMD users.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
what has amd and intel got to do w/ graphics? unless you want to run on intergrated their cpus incease framerate in games only because the bottleneck is the cpu, not gpu. filling up the cpu bottleneck will make the bottleneck the gpu and so on
you got anything else more to say...diglow~Flow wrote:
LOL!cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
you can still run crossfire on 975x... and SLI (hacked bios). after you crossfire the bottleneck will be the CPU. now core 2 duo proved it kicked AMD's ass in everythingdiglow~Flow wrote:
Yeah but once they combine the 2 its just gonna be a WOW Performance. you gotta think having a combined Gpu with the CPU and i having Crossfire there is gonna be a lot of Ati users and AMD users.
AMD's cpu did kick ass in the past, ive used AMD systems and its a hell lot faster in load time than my intels.
Yeah. I fucking hate AMD fanboi's. Performance is the name of the game, and I'm always going to go for whatever offers the best bang for your buck. And right now, that is more certainly not AMD.AveryHawk wrote:
My my my....AMD fanboys who have always beet their chests to the tune of it doesn't matter how many GHZ are now rationalizing that GHZ = Superiority of performance.... LOLdiglow~Flow wrote:
yeah i cant wait till AMD comes out with another CPU. Maybe they'll make a FX-80 that runs 3.0Ghz..
the same thing they have been beating on Intel for for the last 4 years after they lost the Ghz war and "adopted" the "PR" standard......
this man speaks the truth! like a ninja he isghettoperson wrote:
Yeah. I fucking hate AMD fanboi's. Performance is the name of the game, and I'm always going to go for whatever offers the best bang for your buck. And right now, that is more certainly not AMD.AveryHawk wrote:
My my my....AMD fanboys who have always beet their chests to the tune of it doesn't matter how many GHZ are now rationalizing that GHZ = Superiority of performance.... LOLdiglow~Flow wrote:
yeah i cant wait till AMD comes out with another CPU. Maybe they'll make a FX-80 that runs 3.0Ghz..
the same thing they have been beating on Intel for for the last 4 years after they lost the Ghz war and "adopted" the "PR" standard......
we werent born to follow one certain company people, if intel are better then you would surely want intel...?
AMD are fine too...who cares, fanboyism is crude and something 9 year olds do with their stupid trading cards or w/e
AMD are fine too...who cares, fanboyism is crude and something 9 year olds do with their stupid trading cards or w/e