never. never. never. never. your grandparents were fighting it and your grandchildren will be too.Lisik wrote:
so tell us how do u see the and of this conflict.
edit: THIS WAR
Poll
Choice the one u like!
Israel destroy Hezbollah | 59% | 59% - 76 | ||||
Hezbollah destroy Israel | 29% | 29% - 37 | ||||
Im gay! | 11% | 11% - 14 | ||||
Total: 127 |
i blame Iran
QFEGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
never. never. never. never. your grandparents were fighting it and your grandchildren will be too.Lisik wrote:
so tell us how do u see the and of this conflict.
edit: THIS WAR
it's going to keep going until one side uses a weapon they have no appreciation for. Then that wiil be the end for everyone not just your problem. In all these years and after all the harm us jews complain about here we are causing the whole world to cater to our childish whims. Way to inspoire hate moron. Have you already forgotten?
Lisik: A 24 year old:
SMASH END REALITY KILL CRUSH DIE HORRIBLE PAIN SLOW DIE MUSLIM SCUM
how do I see the end? with a whole army of nuts like you being led by a patsy into the worst global war we'll ever see. How do I see it solved? GIVE BACK THE MOTHERFUCXKING LAND (WEST BANK/GAZA) AND GET ON WITH YOUR LIVES. STOP BULLDOZING HOUSES. STOP TRYING TO ENTER THE DOME AL SHARIF. THE BOMBS FOLLOW UP ISRAELI ACTIONS. YOU BOMB RETREATING CIVILIANS YOU ARE ASKING FOR IT EVERY ONE OF THOSE SURVIVORS WILL NOW BE AGAINST YOUR CAUSE, FOOL
I won't answer your poll since all answers are equally narrow minded, irresponsible and stupid
Lisik: A 24 year old:
SMASH END REALITY KILL CRUSH DIE HORRIBLE PAIN SLOW DIE MUSLIM SCUM
how do I see the end? with a whole army of nuts like you being led by a patsy into the worst global war we'll ever see. How do I see it solved? GIVE BACK THE MOTHERFUCXKING LAND (WEST BANK/GAZA) AND GET ON WITH YOUR LIVES. STOP BULLDOZING HOUSES. STOP TRYING TO ENTER THE DOME AL SHARIF. THE BOMBS FOLLOW UP ISRAELI ACTIONS. YOU BOMB RETREATING CIVILIANS YOU ARE ASKING FOR IT EVERY ONE OF THOSE SURVIVORS WILL NOW BE AGAINST YOUR CAUSE, FOOL
I won't answer your poll since all answers are equally narrow minded, irresponsible and stupid
Last edited by Spumantiii (2006-07-25 09:41:25)
Bananahands, you need to get your facts straight before you try to make your arguments. You cannot just blindly say the things that you are saying, because they are without merit. Form a real argument instead of, Israel is democratic, MidEast countries are not, terrorists kill civilians, Israel does not. While it is true that many (if not all) middle east countries are far from the democratic ideal, that is not reason enough to bomb them and overthrow their government. You must remember that there are US allies in the region who we support, and help maintain their monarchies. Both sides are killing civilians. Bottom line. I know you probably do not want to believe it, but it is a fact. Ignore it if you like, but not when making an argument.
Taking out either side is not a working solution. Lisik I understand you are Israeli and this hits closer to home for you, but being 24 years old surely you can come up with a better solution than to destroy them. That simply will not work for either side. Terrorist attacks against Israel need to stop. As do terrorist acts carried out by the state of Israel. Hezbollah is one of many terrorist groups who work against Israel. Taking out Hezbollah will not stop terrorist attacks. As much as it pains me to say it, Hezbollah looks like it is going to be around to influence the Lebanese government. To me a working solution to deal with Hezbollah is to force them to become a legitimite part of the Lebanese government. Force them to win the battle with politics instead of violence. This could be done in a variety of ways, and I believe would result in less bloodshed on both sides. Take away the Syrian influence in Lebanon (Hariri was doing that, which is why he was assassinated). Create a buffer zone in Southern Lebanon/Northern Israel, protected by international peacekeeping forces. Any side that attacks is punished by the international community.
If the end of this conflict were to be decided by one side destroying the other, both sides would cease to exist.
EDIT: How can you call this area Zion, your promised land, your Garden of Eden, when all there is around is constant violence on both sides? If you truly believe your G-d divinely mandated this area to you, do you think Hashem would condone using violence to acheive that? Is that not the same argument people use against Muslims, that their religion preaches violence?
Taking out either side is not a working solution. Lisik I understand you are Israeli and this hits closer to home for you, but being 24 years old surely you can come up with a better solution than to destroy them. That simply will not work for either side. Terrorist attacks against Israel need to stop. As do terrorist acts carried out by the state of Israel. Hezbollah is one of many terrorist groups who work against Israel. Taking out Hezbollah will not stop terrorist attacks. As much as it pains me to say it, Hezbollah looks like it is going to be around to influence the Lebanese government. To me a working solution to deal with Hezbollah is to force them to become a legitimite part of the Lebanese government. Force them to win the battle with politics instead of violence. This could be done in a variety of ways, and I believe would result in less bloodshed on both sides. Take away the Syrian influence in Lebanon (Hariri was doing that, which is why he was assassinated). Create a buffer zone in Southern Lebanon/Northern Israel, protected by international peacekeeping forces. Any side that attacks is punished by the international community.
If the end of this conflict were to be decided by one side destroying the other, both sides would cease to exist.
EDIT: How can you call this area Zion, your promised land, your Garden of Eden, when all there is around is constant violence on both sides? If you truly believe your G-d divinely mandated this area to you, do you think Hashem would condone using violence to acheive that? Is that not the same argument people use against Muslims, that their religion preaches violence?
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2006-07-25 10:08:09)
I think the only reason Syria supports hezbollah is because they are both very anti israeli. Baathists are secular, heziboys aint. I think Iran is much more closely alligned with hezbollahianesque (i made that word up) ideals. it all leads to Tehran in my opinion. Syria wants troops back in Lebanon and the majority of Lebanese hate syria.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Bananahands, you need to get your facts straight before you try to make your arguments. You cannot just blindly say the things that you are saying, because they are without merit. Form a real argument instead of, Israel is democratic, MidEast countries are not, terrorists kill civilians, Israel does not. While it is true that many (if not all) middle east countries are far from the democratic ideal, that is not reason enough to bomb them and overthrow their government. You must remember that there are US allies in the region who we support, and help maintain their monarchies. Both sides are killing civilians. Bottom line. I know you probably do not want to believe it, but it is a fact. Ignore it if you like, but not when making an argument.
Taking out either side is not a working solution. Lisik I understand you are Israeli and this hits closer to home for you, but being 24 years old surely you can come up with a better solution than to destroy them. That simply will not work for either side. Terrorist attacks against Israel need to stop. As do terrorist acts carried out by the state of Israel. Hezbollah is one of many terrorist groups who work against Israel. Taking out Hezbollah will not stop terrorist attacks. As much as it pains me to say it, Hezbollah looks like it is going to be around to influence the Lebanese government. To me a working solution to deal with Hezbollah is to force them to become a legitimite part of the Lebanese government. Force them to win the battle with politics instead of violence. This could be done in a variety of ways, and I believe would result in less bloodshed on both sides. Take away the Syrian influence in Lebanon (Hariri was doing that, which is why he was assassinated). Create a buffer zone in Southern Lebanon/Northern Israel, protected by international peacekeeping forces. Any side that attacks is punished by the international community.
If the end of this conflict were to be decided by one side destroying the other, both sides would cease to exist.
amen.eMarine wrote:
Insurgents ftw!!!111
Lebanon havnt shot 1 shot at Israelis.
u are totaly right!problem its a land!!!Spumantiii wrote:
it's going to keep going until one side uses a weapon they have no appreciation for. Then that wiil be the end for everyone not just your problem. In all these years and after all the harm us jews complain about here we are causing the whole world to cater to our childish whims. Way to inspoire hate moron. Have you already forgotten?
Lisik: A 24 year old:
SMASH END REALITY KILL CRUSH DIE HORRIBLE PAIN SLOW DIE MUSLIM SCUM
how do I see the end? with a whole army of nuts like you being led by a patsy into the worst global war we'll ever see. How do I see it solved? GIVE BACK THE MOTHERFUCXKING LAND (WEST BANK/GAZA) AND GET ON WITH YOUR LIVES. STOP BULLDOZING HOUSES. STOP TRYING TO ENTER THE DOME AL SHARIF. THE BOMBS FOLLOW UP ISRAELI ACTIONS. YOU BOMB RETREATING CIVILIANS YOU ARE ASKING FOR IT EVERY ONE OF THOSE SURVIVORS WILL NOW BE AGAINST YOUR CAUSE, FOOL
I won't answer your poll since all answers are equally narrow minded, irresponsible and stupid
so lats see how it was(correct me if i am wrong)... after world war 2 is over, some good people decide to place all jews on theyr old land were they can build theyr own country and finaly be there in save!(large thanks them for that) but what the suprise..... the only jews steps on that land, they was attacked!!! by everyone!!! 6 muslem countries!!! millions of people!!! tanks!!! guerillas!!! suicide bombers!!! armies of the enemy, who wanted kill them till the last one!!!
jews won all of thouse!!!
so now tell me what kind of humanism are u talking about!!! and what kind of answers have to be in the post!!!
I guess the rockets fired from Lebanon were from the non-lebanese hezbuddies[n00b]Tyler wrote:
amen.eMarine wrote:
Insurgents ftw!!!111
Lebanon havnt shot 1 shot at Israelis.
both of you are dumb, nuff said.
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-07-25 10:40:52)
you don't need to remind me I know alot about it. 67 to 1 kill ratios by the IAF.Lisik wrote:
u are totaly right!problem its a land!!!Spumantiii wrote:
it's going to keep going until one side uses a weapon they have no appreciation for. Then that wiil be the end for everyone not just your problem. In all these years and after all the harm us jews complain about here we are causing the whole world to cater to our childish whims. Way to inspoire hate moron. Have you already forgotten?
Lisik: A 24 year old:
SMASH END REALITY KILL CRUSH DIE HORRIBLE PAIN SLOW DIE MUSLIM SCUM
how do I see the end? with a whole army of nuts like you being led by a patsy into the worst global war we'll ever see. How do I see it solved? GIVE BACK THE MOTHERFUCXKING LAND (WEST BANK/GAZA) AND GET ON WITH YOUR LIVES. STOP BULLDOZING HOUSES. STOP TRYING TO ENTER THE DOME AL SHARIF. THE BOMBS FOLLOW UP ISRAELI ACTIONS. YOU BOMB RETREATING CIVILIANS YOU ARE ASKING FOR IT EVERY ONE OF THOSE SURVIVORS WILL NOW BE AGAINST YOUR CAUSE, FOOL
I won't answer your poll since all answers are equally narrow minded, irresponsible and stupid
so lats see how it was(correct me if i am wrong)... after world war 2 is over, some good people decide to place all jews on theyr old land were they can build theyr own country and finaly be there in save!(large thanks them for that) but what the suprise..... the only jews steps on that land, they was attacked!!! by everyone!!! 6 muslem countries!!! millions of people!!! tanks!!! guerillas!!! suicide bombers!!! armies of the enemy, who wanted kill them till the last one!!!
jews won all of thouse!!!
BUT how can you punish them when you have no semblance of what you were fighting for before? Before it was a case of survival now it is just vengeful. And everyone knows you need no help in a war with those countries, the point is aren't you supposed to be trying to prove them wrong? You make us look bad by crossing borders and killing old women
Last edited by Spumantiii (2006-07-25 10:43:14)
You are wrong. How is it that a 25 year-old born and raised on the west coast of the United States knows your country's formation better than you? Or are you just playing ignorant?Lisik wrote:
u are totaly right!problem its a land!!!
so lats see how it was(correct me if i am wrong)... after world war 2 is over, some good people decide to place all jews on theyr old land were they can build theyr own country and finaly be there in save!(large thanks them for that) but what the suprise..... the only jews steps on that land, they was attacked!!! by everyone!!! 6 muslem countries!!! millions of people!!! tanks!!! guerillas!!! suicide bombers!!! armies of the enemy, who wanted kill them till the last one!!!
jews won all of thouse!!!
so now tell me what kind of humanism are u talking about!!! and what kind of answers have to be in the post!!!
Arab countries attacked Israel after they claimed their independence. Israeli settlers (financed by Euro scions of business like the Rothschilds of the UK and backed politically by the Balfour Declaration) were settling the region before WW2. After WW2, there were two territories, Palestine and Israel. Israel immediately claimed independence, not recognized by the international community. Arab countries attacked after this, and systematically lost their territory in defeat after defeat. Now, I am not condoning Arab action in the mid-20th century, but give the land back mate. Your country did not "win it fair and square" and does not deserve it. Small concessions like that would go a long way in stopping the violence in the area. Most likely, nothing Israel or the international community does or says will stop extremists from carrying out terrorist acts. The idea is not to change their minds, but to change the minds of the overall Arab/International community.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2006-07-25 10:59:34)
Lisik, I'm curious, what is your reasoning behind you deserving that land moreso than anyone else?
Just because it was "given" to you after WWII isn't acceptable because that also means it was "taken" from someone else.
Just because it was "given" to you after WWII isn't acceptable because that also means it was "taken" from someone else.
u right, its not the same fight! its a junk of that fight! and its a big piece of junk! hezbollah its a big organization!! fathers, mothres and kids! thousand of people!! and what i have to prove? that thousands of hezbollah peoples whant to kill us? i think u have to be a blind to not see that!!!Spumantiii wrote:
you don't need to remind me I know alot about it. 67 to 1 kill ratios by the IAF.Lisik wrote:
u are totaly right!problem its a land!!!Spumantiii wrote:
it's going to keep going until one side uses a weapon they have no appreciation for. Then that wiil be the end for everyone not just your problem. In all these years and after all the harm us jews complain about here we are causing the whole world to cater to our childish whims. Way to inspoire hate moron. Have you already forgotten?
Lisik: A 24 year old:
SMASH END REALITY KILL CRUSH DIE HORRIBLE PAIN SLOW DIE MUSLIM SCUM
how do I see the end? with a whole army of nuts like you being led by a patsy into the worst global war we'll ever see. How do I see it solved? GIVE BACK THE MOTHERFUCXKING LAND (WEST BANK/GAZA) AND GET ON WITH YOUR LIVES. STOP BULLDOZING HOUSES. STOP TRYING TO ENTER THE DOME AL SHARIF. THE BOMBS FOLLOW UP ISRAELI ACTIONS. YOU BOMB RETREATING CIVILIANS YOU ARE ASKING FOR IT EVERY ONE OF THOSE SURVIVORS WILL NOW BE AGAINST YOUR CAUSE, FOOL
I won't answer your poll since all answers are equally narrow minded, irresponsible and stupid
so lats see how it was(correct me if i am wrong)... after world war 2 is over, some good people decide to place all jews on theyr old land were they can build theyr own country and finaly be there in save!(large thanks them for that) but what the suprise..... the only jews steps on that land, they was attacked!!! by everyone!!! 6 muslem countries!!! millions of people!!! tanks!!! guerillas!!! suicide bombers!!! armies of the enemy, who wanted kill them till the last one!!!
jews won all of thouse!!!
BUT how can you punish them when you have no semblance of what you were fighting for before? Before it was a case of survival now it is just vengeful. And everyone knows you need no help in a war with those countries, the point is aren't you supposed to be trying to prove them wrong? You make us look bad by crossing borders and killing old women
and be sure, the number of dead terrorist that u see on tv, is totaly wrong!!
if u didnt niticed, some of jews was there already! long before hitler was even born!Knifey McStabstab wrote:
Lisik, I'm curious, what is your reasoning behind you deserving that land moreso than anyone else?
Just because it was "given" to you after WWII isn't acceptable because that also means it was "taken" from someone else.
and religion books its also historical books, so u cant ignore the age of thouse books! so read koran and look in wich place of this world, jews have to be!
lol in thouse books u also can read who gonna win in this war :p but its off topick lol
and hezbollah people are lebanones, so i hope its not hadr to understand why bombs fals in lebanon!
it's the israeli lowing
Woah nice quadruple post. And Jews do not have to be anywhere. No one does. I know plenty of Jews that don't live in Israel. You have no more right to the land then any other human being. I can also say that if I lived near you I would probably be driven to violence also.
And I don't even want to get started on religion. Especially with a closed minded, Zionist jackass such as yourself.
Maybe people from Lebonese-Hezbollah are Lebanese but not all Lebanese are members (or even support) Hezbollah.Lisik wrote:
and hezbollah people are lebanones, so i hope its not hadr to understand why bombs fals in lebanon!
And I don't even want to get started on religion. Especially with a closed minded, Zionist jackass such as yourself.
Last edited by Knifey McStabstab (2006-07-25 11:57:26)
Are you saying every Lebanese that Israel kills deserves to die? Man woman or child, or old?Lisik wrote:
u right, its not the same fight! its a junk of that fight! and its a big piece of junk! hezbollah its a big organization!! fathers, mothres and kids! thousand of people!! and what i have to prove? that thousands of hezbollah peoples whant to kill us? i think u have to be a blind to not see that!!!Spumantiii wrote:
you don't need to remind me I know alot about it. 67 to 1 kill ratios by the IAF.Lisik wrote:
u are totaly right!problem its a land!!!
so lats see how it was(correct me if i am wrong)... after world war 2 is over, some good people decide to place all jews on theyr old land were they can build theyr own country and finaly be there in save!(large thanks them for that) but what the suprise..... the only jews steps on that land, they was attacked!!! by everyone!!! 6 muslem countries!!! millions of people!!! tanks!!! guerillas!!! suicide bombers!!! armies of the enemy, who wanted kill them till the last one!!!
jews won all of thouse!!!
BUT how can you punish them when you have no semblance of what you were fighting for before? Before it was a case of survival now it is just vengeful. And everyone knows you need no help in a war with those countries, the point is aren't you supposed to be trying to prove them wrong? You make us look bad by crossing borders and killing old women
and be sure, the number of dead terrorist that u see on tv, is totaly wrong!!
Last edited by Spumantiii (2006-07-25 11:55:13)
yet now, if you "give it back", it's ok to "take it from" IsraelKnifey McStabstab wrote:
Lisik, I'm curious, what is your reasoning behind you deserving that land moreso than anyone else?
Just because it was "given" to you after WWII isn't acceptable because that also means it was "taken" from someone else.
Before there was Israel, the area was administed by the British Authority. Before that, it was part of the Ottoman Empire. Before that, well, we're talking Renaissance times.
So, Israel, Palestine and Jordan all have equal claims to part of the area. Division was made and Jordan and Israel are satisfied, but the Palestinians are not. The rest of the Arabs are just anti-Jewish and using whatever excuse they can to spill blood.
As for the Lebanese, if they allow Hezbollah to run the Southern part of the country, and refer to them as "protectors", then they can suffer when Hezbollah acts as it can only do - by inciting violence.
So, Israel, Palestine and Jordan all have equal claims to part of the area. Division was made and Jordan and Israel are satisfied, but the Palestinians are not. The rest of the Arabs are just anti-Jewish and using whatever excuse they can to spill blood.
As for the Lebanese, if they allow Hezbollah to run the Southern part of the country, and refer to them as "protectors", then they can suffer when Hezbollah acts as it can only do - by inciting violence.
Small point: a distinct minority of Lebanese refer to Hezbollah as 'their protectors'.Sondernkommando wrote:
Before there was Israel, the area was administed by the British Authority. Before that, it was part of the Ottoman Empire. Before that, well, we're talking Renaissance times.
So, Israel, Palestine and Jordan all have equal claims to part of the area. Division was made and Jordan and Israel are satisfied, but the Palestinians are not. The rest of the Arabs are just anti-Jewish and using whatever excuse they can to spill blood.
As for the Lebanese, if they allow Hezbollah to run the Southern part of the country, and refer to them as "protectors", then they can suffer when Hezbollah acts as it can only do - by inciting violence.
I agree with the 1948 state of Israel being made the final state of Israel so don't get me wrong here - your rationale implies that well if Nazi Germany took Poland then why should we take it off them???kr@cker wrote:
yet now, if you "give it back", it's ok to "take it from" IsraelKnifey McStabstab wrote:
Lisik, I'm curious, what is your reasoning behind you deserving that land moreso than anyone else?
Just because it was "given" to you after WWII isn't acceptable because that also means it was "taken" from someone else.