First of all, the comment which you quoted (and cut in half doing so) "I never said no one cared about what you had to say", was not contradicting his earlier statement. His earlier statement was "no-one cares how much money you spent". They are different things. In your own words "you look like a doofus".Riddick51PB wrote:
Look up there in red. You said "no one cares...." ftw!: You're contradicting yourself. Translation: you look like a doofus.ThomasMorgan wrote:
I never said no one caredRiddick51PB wrote:
ftw: the fact that you write that means that you do care, my man.
that is all my money. all for the rest of you.actually, you can buy skill. you can buy a coach or a better computer. all of those increase skills. if not, then complexity would be playing on 286 computers. Translation: You, thomasmorgan, are mentally challenged.ThomasMorgan wrote:
about what you had to say, as is shown by the responses to this thread. You seem to be a big fan of 'ftw', so how about you chew on this: ftw, reading comprehension.
It's a shame you can't buy intelligence with all that wasted money. Nor can you buy skill.
ive been playing bf2 since 01-June-2006, two months now. I'll get better. Played 65 hours during seven days recently. ive played the professionals game, cs 1.6 for 6 years now, and trust me, i can drill new holes in your cranium in cs 1.6.
rofl, ur 4 inch sig. you're loaded with exaggeration, much like a 4yo school child.
master of business administration, 3.5/4.0 GPA
bs, accounting
Second of all, putting "ftw" before so many of the things you say makes you seem quite childish in my opinion.
Thirdly, you are relatively new to this forum, and yet you come on here with an extremely arrogant attitude, insulting long standing forum members, and repeatedly bragging about how good you are at a game which has nothing to do with this forum. So you can play cs well, who gives a shit? I know I don't.
Fourthly, are we supposed to be impressed that you spent 65 hours on a game in one week? That's equivalent to over nine hours a day. Either you have no job (in which case explain to me how you spent $10,000 on a website and computer), or, and I find this much more likely, you have no life.
Fifthly, as to your original idea. Assuming that everyones interpretation of your ambiguously worded post is correct and you mean "every server must always have a 500 ticket ratio", I think it might be fun to have that as an option, but I don't think it should be forced on people. If you want longer rounds, you can always go on 16 player servers running 64 player maps.
Finally, what do Indianapolis 500 and Daytona 500 (2 motor racing events) have to do with BF2 (a computer game simulating modern warfare)? The only slight similarity I can see is the fact that they are both "modern day". Am I missing something or was that a completely stupid comparison on your part?
If you are going to post on here, please try and say something that makes sense.
Wraith
