What is pathetic?SargeV1.4 wrote:
pathetic
Poll
Do you think Gay marriage should be legal
| No not at all | 34% | 34% - 126 | ||||
| Yes they should be able to | 38% | 38% - 140 | ||||
| Civil unions only | 16% | 16% - 61 | ||||
| Not even civil unions allowed | 10% | 10% - 37 | ||||
| Total: 364 | ||||||
Just wanted to give a shout out to my good buddies "Chuckles" and "Puckmercury". I have only one last thing to say to you two regarding your previous attacks at my personal viewpoint. You can quote me on this.
Here's something for your both...
"WSl.g hmn90njWa2yjl"
..wanna know what that is? It was me dragging my ballsack across my keyboard.
Enjoy!
Here's something for your both...
"WSl.g hmn90njWa2yjl"
..wanna know what that is? It was me dragging my ballsack across my keyboard.
Enjoy!
heavy subject.... how comes?Snipedya14 wrote:
Thats called adoption.niekjejeje wrote:
how can have 2 mans a baby :Sheman6666 wrote:
maybe get married but not have a kid. then they only create another gay and he creates another gay and he craetes another gay ond so on. at last they have conquered the world amd kills all woman and only gays are allowed to live. then the human rase is gone AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
i go hang myself now
wow niekjejeje is really getting involved here..... but i think he/she is right ( my opinion )
if 2 Pol love each other they should be able to get married. and adopt children. 2 same gender sex ppl can provide a much more stable environment for a child then 2 junkies living in a cardboard box, as said before and are in my opinion just as able to raise a child....
i have seen children on TV raised by gays/les and did not turn gay themselves ( fear of many) and seemed very happy.
so why say no to this?
fear of the unknown is generally not a good advice giver ( or something like that)
do what makes you happy if you're not endangering others and try to b less judgmental
no not gay yes do know some
I think marriage as a legal binding is a right. Any two people have the right to share property as a married couple does. I also think to add exclusivity to marriage is an infringment on human rights as well as constitutional rights. My vote: Gays have every right I do. I don't care if you're gay, as long as you're not annoying.
That's just about right. "I can't come up with a rational argument supporting my personal viewpoint, so I'll try to insult you"SFCCDailey wrote:
Just wanted to give a shout out to my good buddies "Chuckles" and "Puckmercury". I have only one last thing to say to you two regarding your previous attacks at my personal viewpoint. You can quote me on this.
Here's something for your both...
"WSl.g hmn90njWa2yjl"
..wanna know what that is? It was me dragging my ballsack across my keyboard.
Enjoy!
You're neat.
Dick + Pussy= baby.. simple equation that gays and lesbians fail to understand.
two dicks or two pussies dont make babies you noobs
I have seen marriages in many cultures. have you seen two hindu guys in india get married in the ancient traditional way> I DONT THINK SO.
i dont see two male penguins having sex and making little penguins.
Marriage since the beginning of time is written in stone as the following: man + woman .
two dicks or two pussies dont make babies you noobs
I have seen marriages in many cultures. have you seen two hindu guys in india get married in the ancient traditional way> I DONT THINK SO.
i dont see two male penguins having sex and making little penguins.
Marriage since the beginning of time is written in stone as the following: man + woman .
Why is the ability to reproduce so very important? What if a heterosexual couple is infertile? Should they be allowed to marry?specialistx2324 wrote:
Dick + Pussy= baby.. simple equation that gays and lesbians fail to understand.
two dicks or two pussies dont make babies you noobs
I have seen marriages in many cultures. have you seen two hindu guys in india get married in the ancient traditional way> I DONT THINK SO.
i dont see two male penguins having sex and making little penguins.
Marriage since the beginning of time is written in stone as the following: man + woman .
Are we running out of people so that we have to make sure every married couple can pop out a few rugrats?
The very simple equation that I wonder if you understand is this: Making babies does not equal one's worth in life.
No. I don't believe in Homosexuality AT ALL.
you're right, I don't believe in it either. It's just like Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and man loving lesbians.
Anyone? Anyone?
Oh, and pizie faeries. All made up.
Anyone? Anyone?
Oh, and pizie faeries. All made up.
You mean you don't think it exists? Why is that?leetkyle wrote:
No. I don't believe in Homosexuality AT ALL.
I believe that people are born with genetic imbalances that make them predisposed to be gay. How else do you explain man chicks and femme guys?
As its natural, I have no issue with gay people. I do however, remain more suspicious with them around my kids than straight people.
Sorry, its how I feel.
As its natural, I have no issue with gay people. I do however, remain more suspicious with them around my kids than straight people.
Sorry, its how I feel.
Agreed personaly i think marrige is between a man and a women... and on gays having kids NO NO !!SkoobyDu wrote:
'Camp' Gays just really annoy me, I mean is there any need to mince around like a fairy?
the children should be alowed to have a normal likfe not to be brought up by gays who are gonna bring home dodgy people into his or her life.. children need a balance a mother and a farther .. the child will most liky become a gay wich isnt fair on the kid
Gays bring home "dodgy" people? Really? More "dodgy" than straight people bring home? I know lots of heterosexual couples I wouldn't trust to watch a spoon, and I know homosexual couples I'd let baby sit my son. And I assume you have statistics that back up that children brought up by gay couples are more likely to become gay. I'm sure you've got reams and reams of literature you're about to link to so we can all see what you are talking about. I'll be waiting.plastic_budgie wrote:
Agreed personaly i think marrige is between a man and a women... and on gays having kids NO NO !!SkoobyDu wrote:
'Camp' Gays just really annoy me, I mean is there any need to mince around like a fairy?
the children should be alowed to have a normal likfe not to be brought up by gays who are gonna bring home dodgy people into his or her life.. children need a balance a mother and a farther .. the child will most liky become a gay wich isnt fair on the kid
Yeah, don't talk about the women who have 5 kids from 5 different men and the "dodgy" people they bring home. Face it, the anti-gay group cannot come up with any valid argument for why gay people shouldn't be able to get married, other than the Bible says that homosexuality is a sin.Chuckles wrote:
Gays bring home "dodgy" people? Really? More "dodgy" than straight people bring home? I know lots of heterosexual couples I wouldn't trust to watch a spoon, and I know homosexual couples I'd let baby sit my son. And I assume you have statistics that back up that children brought up by gay couples are more likely to become gay. I'm sure you've got reams and reams of literature you're about to link to so we can all see what you are talking about. I'll be waiting.plastic_budgie wrote:
Agreed personaly i think marrige is between a man and a women... and on gays having kids NO NO !!SkoobyDu wrote:
'Camp' Gays just really annoy me, I mean is there any need to mince around like a fairy?
the children should be alowed to have a normal likfe not to be brought up by gays who are gonna bring home dodgy people into his or her life.. children need a balance a mother and a farther .. the child will most liky become a gay wich isnt fair on the kid
Is it really up to us? How is gay marriage hurting the straight marriages? Are straight people going to suddenly become gay becuase of this? It is none of our business what other people want to do. Homosexualality is not a choice, but something your are born with. (they have a missing part, shall we say.) Ask a gay person. I have. (I'm not gay, for those of you who don't read much into posts.)
Eh, fuck that fairy tale. Nothing more than a conversation peice, anymore.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Yeah, don't talk about the women who have 5 kids from 5 different men and the "dodgy" people they bring home. Face it, the anti-gay group cannot come up with any valid argument for why gay people shouldn't be able to get married, other than the Bible says that homosexuality is a sin.
It hurts us because we are scared. Yes we will all be gay one day, 'cause you know.... being gay is a virus and all. Oh and i'll go ahead and jump on a limb here and say "teh gays are spreading AIDS". That needed to be said in this assinine topic too. Oh and gays are pedophiles too.... right.mooncricket wrote:
Is it really up to us? How is gay marriage hurting the straight marriages? Are straight people going to suddenly become gay becuase of this? It is none of our business what other people want to do. Homosexualality is not a choice, but something your are born with. (they have a missing part, shall we say.) Ask a gay person. I have. (I'm not gay, for those of you who don't read much into posts.)
Did I leave anything out?
Last edited by fermium (2006-07-22 17:44:39)
Would you care to clarify what the fuck you are talking about in this post, and the one you made right after it. Doesn't make much sense.fermium wrote:
Eh, fuck that fairy tale. Nothing more than a conversation peice, anymore.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Yeah, don't talk about the women who have 5 kids from 5 different men and the "dodgy" people they bring home. Face it, the anti-gay group cannot come up with any valid argument for why gay people shouldn't be able to get married, other than the Bible says that homosexuality is a sin.
There narrowed that down.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Would you care to clarify what the fuck you are talking about in this post, and the one you made right after it. Doesn't make much sense.fermium wrote:
Eh, fuck that fairy tale. Nothing more than a conversation peice, anymore.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Bible
2nd post... sarcasam much?
Last edited by fermium (2006-07-22 17:48:49)
Well, if you had read some of the posts from the ultra homophobic, religious types in this thread, seeing the sarcasm isn't quite so easy. Maybe end your posts with a [/sarcasm] tag.fermium wrote:
There narrowed that down.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Would you care to clarify what the fuck you are talking about in this post, and the one you made right after it. Doesn't make much sense.fermium wrote:
Eh, fuck that fairy tale. Nothing more than a conversation peice, anymore.
2nd post... sarcasam much?
Seems to be more votes for than against gays, I think we have our answer.
Not that I agree with banning gay marriage, but I'm going to play Devil's Advocate here for just a minute. Being an international forum, and having many members from far more progressive countries, means that the poll doesn't necessarily reflect American sentiment on this topic.TrollmeaT wrote:
Seems to be more votes for than against gays, I think we have our answer.
The topic doesn't specify "in America." The poll is valid in so far as it is a representation of the majority of forum users opinions.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Not that I agree with banning gay marriage, but I'm going to play Devil's Advocate here for just a minute. Being an international forum, and having many members from far more progressive countries, means that the poll doesn't necessarily reflect American sentiment on this topic.TrollmeaT wrote:
Seems to be more votes for than against gays, I think we have our answer.
I'd say there are certainly more reasonable arguments on the side that thinks gays should be allowed to marry, or at least have civil unions.TrollmeaT wrote:
Seems to be more votes for than against gays, I think we have our answer.
I don't think we've seen one thoughtful post explaining why one would think they shouldn't.
I realize that. I'm just adressing it from that point because the OP is from America, and it is quite a hot topic here. So much so that they want to amend the US constitution to prevent it; I only mentioned that because your information does not mention where you are from, and wasn't sure if you understood that this was happening.jonsimon wrote:
The topic doesn't specify "in America." The poll is valid in so far as it is a representation of the majority of forum users opinions.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Not that I agree with banning gay marriage, but I'm going to play Devil's Advocate here for just a minute. Being an international forum, and having many members from far more progressive countries, means that the poll doesn't necessarily reflect American sentiment on this topic.TrollmeaT wrote:
Seems to be more votes for than against gays, I think we have our answer.