Look here people. If you think for one moment that muslims or arabs pose any danger to the very existence of western civilisation then you're dumber than I thought. The arabs have repeatedly shown time and time again that they couldn't run a piss-up in a brewery. Do you think a small extremist minority are going to fare any better? The arabs can't even agree amongst themselves - that's their fucking problem. If you think for a minute that the Taliban are going to be in Congress or Hezbollah will be getting any seats in the Dáil - by force or by vote - then you are badly mistaken. I can't believe your outlandish views on the threat posed by Islamic militants. Newsflash: you're dreaming if you think 'Islamo-fascism' poses any threat to western values and western civilisation.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Exactly. Its funny how people like Cameron, who have all the benefits of western civilization, whine and moan so much when its obvious that if Hezbollah or any islamo-facist regime were in control they wouldnt even be allowed to voice objection.fadedsteve wrote:
But if Hezbollah were in control, you wouldnt have that right. . . . .thats why I support freedom, and those countries who fight for it!
Obviously!
Its ok, I know I'm right, you know your right, and history in the end will prove the both of us are right!
Its ok, I know I'm right, you know your right, and history in the end will prove the both of us are right!
actually dumbshit my point all along has been that israel attacking lebanon isnt them attacking a small sect or one resistance group but lebanon itself harboring terrorist groups not only in the south but in the govt as well. and just so you can take that dick out of your canadien mouth..spastic bullet wrote:
Molson is moose piss we export to countries that don't know any better. Speaking of not knowing any better, I suppose I'm wasting my time if I point out it was you that got caught pulling numbers out of your ass, not me. Well, hope springs eternal...ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ wrote:
no eh ? i mean eh.. have a molson eh ? and learn some facts before talking shit eh ?
go look it up eh ? resistance groups comprise about 40% of thier parliament eh ?
It was you that got caught pulling numbers out of your ass, not me.
And now you're casually switching to "resistance groups", as if you weren't really talking about Hezbollah all along. Nice try. "Resistance" is about as vague and subjective as you can get. Which, coincidentally, is about as vague as you need it to be in order to not get proved wrong. Again.
ROFL... Next you'll be telling us Gavrilo Princip held 28 seats in the Serbian parliament. Shit, that's not funny...
amal movement 14 seats
hezbollah 23 seats
al-Hizb al-Qawmi 4
"other" 4
=45
45/128 = 35% dumbfuck
oh ok they are only 35% percent terrorist thats hardly prevalent enough to be considered a lebonese problem
dumbass...
I have actually rarely been rude on this thread. Two or three instances max. It was hardly a hardcore insult either.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Dont mind the redhead. He can be rude when someone makes a point he disagrees with.
Do you remember a day called 9/11? Sit down punk.CameronPoe wrote:
Look here people. If you think for one moment that muslims or arabs pose any danger to the very existence of western civilisation then you're dumber than I thought. The arabs have repeatedly shown time and time again that they couldn't run a piss-up in a brewery. Do you think a small extremist minority are going to fare any better? The arabs can't even agree amongst themselves - that's their fucking problem. If you think for a minute that the Taliban are going to be in Congress or Hezbollah will be getting any seats in the Dáil - by force or by vote - then you are badly mistaken. I can't believe your outlandish views on the threat posed by Islamic militants. Newsflash: you're dreaming if you think 'Islamo-fascism' poses any threat to western values and western civilisation.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Exactly. Its funny how people like Cameron, who have all the benefits of western civilization, whine and moan so much when its obvious that if Hezbollah or any islamo-facist regime were in control they wouldnt even be allowed to voice objection.fadedsteve wrote:
But if Hezbollah were in control, you wouldnt have that right. . . . .thats why I support freedom, and those countries who fight for it!
Last edited by -=NHB=- Bananahands (2006-07-25 02:48:28)
How do you 'know about war'? If your Israeli I assume you did your 2 years service or whatever. Knowledge comes from available sources. I have read many books. I do have first hand experience of Israel and Palestine. When I look at the evidence presented to me I make a judgement. If you disagree with that judgement then that's fair enough. I don't think you can devalue my comments just because of my knowlege sources.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
You can criticize it all you want but you look stupid saying that you know about war because you "read books" on it.CameronPoe wrote:
We all have the right to criticise what we see fit to criticise - just as you are criticising Hezbollah.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
He just said he was bombed before, so yes he was at least indirectly involved in a war. As for your "books" thats all nice and fine but that dosent give you the credentials to criticize Israel's war plan.
PS Did you kill any Palestinian children when you did your service?
Oh yeah - 3000 deaths. How many westerners are there again? LOL-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Do you remember a day called 9/11? Sit down punk.CameronPoe wrote:
Look here people. If you think for one moment that muslims or arabs pose any danger to the very existence of western civilisation then you're dumber than I thought. The arabs have repeatedly shown time and time again that they couldn't run a piss-up in a brewery. Do you think a small extremist minority are going to fare any better? The arabs can't even agree amongst themselves - that's their fucking problem. If you think for a minute that the Taliban are going to be in Congress or Hezbollah will be getting any seats in the Dáil - by force or by vote - then you are badly mistaken. I can't believe your outlandish views on the threat posed by Islamic militants. Newsflash: you're dreaming if you think 'Islamo-fascism' poses any threat to western values and western civilisation.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Exactly. Its funny how people like Cameron, who have all the benefits of western civilization, whine and moan so much when its obvious that if Hezbollah or any islamo-facist regime were in control they wouldnt even be allowed to voice objection.
That just shows how biased you are. No matter what you side with the middle east. September 11th is no joking matter you piece of trash.CameronPoe wrote:
Oh yeah - 3000 deaths. How many westerners are there again? LOL-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Do you remember a day called 9/11? Sit down punk.CameronPoe wrote:
Look here people. If you think for one moment that muslims or arabs pose any danger to the very existence of western civilisation then you're dumber than I thought. The arabs have repeatedly shown time and time again that they couldn't run a piss-up in a brewery. Do you think a small extremist minority are going to fare any better? The arabs can't even agree amongst themselves - that's their fucking problem. If you think for a minute that the Taliban are going to be in Congress or Hezbollah will be getting any seats in the Dáil - by force or by vote - then you are badly mistaken. I can't believe your outlandish views on the threat posed by Islamic militants. Newsflash: you're dreaming if you think 'Islamo-fascism' poses any threat to western values and western civilisation.
LOL, I see we have another "maximizer". You decided to round up the percentage ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ pulled out of his ass, even though it's right there in the post you quoted that we have two possible figures, and that's not one of them.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Are you serious? You think its ok for a terrorist group to hold even 22 percent of the seats in government?spastic bullet wrote:
It is interesting the accounts don't agree, the first wiki article saying 14 and the second 23. What did you say again? 28? That's interesting too. Hey, let's convert those into percentages, yes?
The first wiki article:
14/128 = 10.9% of Lebanon's parliament represent Hezbollah
The second wiki article:
23/128 = 18.0% of Lebanon's parliament represent Hezbollah
We don't know which of those is correct, of course. Here's what somebody else said...
You:
28/128 = 21.9% of Lebanon's parliament represent HezbollahSeems to me that it's your attempt to "maximize" Hezbollah's part in the government that's insincere. Never mind, though, eh? I mean, what you said was only about 40% bullshit, right? Yum!ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ wrote:
you want to distance hezbolla from the govt but its insincere. hezbollah and resistance movements in lebanon are a prevalent influence and power. if i gave you a sandwich thats 60% bologne and 40% shit its a shit sandwitch.
Hey, why stop there? You know, if you set the number of significant digits to 1, then use a ceiling function to round up, you get... 100% Hezbollah!!!!!!! zOMG! Can we deploy the bombers yet???!!!! CAn we????! 100% HEzbollah!!!!!! CAN WE DEPLOY TEH BOBMERS!!!????!
*sigh* Look man, firstly, as has been pointed out about a million times here and elsewhere...
Secondly, I seem to recall asking somebody to rationally define the emotive language they insist on using, specifically "terrorist" and "terrorism". Was that you? I think it was. If I recall, you chose to ignore that request, probably because you know what will happen if you do try to actually define those terms -- the definitions will apply just as easily to our friends and allies' actions as they do to those of our enemies.ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ wrote:
Political activities
Hezbollah is an active participant in the political life and processes of Lebanon (much in the same way as Hamas in Palestinian communities). The organization has been involved in activities like building schools, clinics, and hospitals.[9][58] In 1992, it participated in Lebanese elections for the first time, winning 12 out of 128 seats in parliament. It won 10 seats in 1996, and 8 in 2000. In the general election of 2005, it won 23 seats nationwide, and an Amal-Hezbollah alliance won all 23 seats in Southern Lebanon.
I'll tell you what, here's a challenge: I challenge you to define "terrorism" in such a way that it...
1. Is not merely synonymous with
a. "Guerrilla"
b. "Enemy"
c. "Arab"
d. "Muslim"
e. "Islamist"
f. "Hezbollah" or "Hamas", etc.
AND
2. Does not apply to either the US, UK or Israel or actions by approved allies of the same, except by explicit exclusion (i.e. "just because they're allies")
In other words, try to come up with a neutral definition that doesn't implicate us or our allies in some way. If you can, I will answer your question. Otherwise, it's just a bunch of stat-stretching emotional manipulation you're trying to feed us.
You obviously have no clue of their power around the world. . . See this is pre-9/11 thought, and I am glad this sort of diarrea of the mind has not permiated our government leaders brains. Debating this to someone who has no clue that western civilization is under seige is pointless. If you don't get it, that we are at war, and our very existence and way of life is at stake than I don't know what else to say to you. . . .CameronPoe wrote:
Look here people. If you think for one moment that muslims or arabs pose any danger to the very existence of western civilisation then you're dumber than I thought. The arabs have repeatedly shown time and time again that they couldn't run a piss-up in a brewery. Do you think a small extremist minority are going to fare any better? The arabs can't even agree amongst themselves - that's their fucking problem. If you think for a minute that the Taliban are going to be in Congress or Hezbollah will be getting any seats in the Dáil - by force or by vote - then you are badly mistaken. I can't believe your outlandish views on the threat posed by Islamic militants. Newsflash: you're dreaming if you think 'Islamo-fascism' poses any threat to western values and western civilisation.
This idea that these muslims have no intent on world domination and chaos, is FOOLHARDY! Stick to playing video games buddy, cause political science AINT your bag!! Liberalism is a mental disorder, remember that! This mindset you got rockin was a similar mindset Europeans had toward Hitler. . . hmmm! Last time I checked the Nazi's were a minority party, similar to the Taliban in Afghanistan, both rose to power and terrorized their own people as well as others. Same with Hezbollah, they were small, and now have risen to be a major terrorist organization. So saying that these muslims won't be in charge anytime soon, or aren't seeking world power is mind boggling. I don't know what else to say to you other than your IN CORRECT. . .
Last edited by fadedsteve (2006-07-25 02:58:51)
Your just embarrasing yourself.spastic bullet wrote:
LOL, I see we have another "maximizer". You decided to round up the percentage ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ pulled out of his ass, even though it's right there in the post you quoted that we have two possible figures, and that's not one of them.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Are you serious? You think its ok for a terrorist group to hold even 22 percent of the seats in government?spastic bullet wrote:
It is interesting the accounts don't agree, the first wiki article saying 14 and the second 23. What did you say again? 28? That's interesting too. Hey, let's convert those into percentages, yes?
The first wiki article:
14/128 = 10.9% of Lebanon's parliament represent Hezbollah
The second wiki article:
23/128 = 18.0% of Lebanon's parliament represent Hezbollah
We don't know which of those is correct, of course. Here's what somebody else said...
You:
28/128 = 21.9% of Lebanon's parliament represent Hezbollah
Seems to me that it's your attempt to "maximize" Hezbollah's part in the government that's insincere. Never mind, though, eh? I mean, what you said was only about 40% bullshit, right? Yum!
Hey, why stop there? You know, if you set the number of significant digits to 1, then use a ceiling function to round up, you get... 100% Hezbollah!!!!!!! zOMG! Can we deploy the bombers yet???!!!! CAn we????! 100% HEzbollah!!!!!! CAN WE DEPLOY TEH BOBMERS!!!????!
*sigh* Look man, firstly, as has been pointed out about a million times here and elsewhere...Secondly, I seem to recall asking somebody to rationally define the emotive language they insist on using, specifically "terrorist" and "terrorism". Was that you? I think it was. If I recall, you chose to ignore that request, probably because you know what will happen if you do try to actually define those terms -- the definitions will apply just as easily to our friends and allies' actions as they do to those of our enemies.ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ wrote:
Political activities
Hezbollah is an active participant in the political life and processes of Lebanon (much in the same way as Hamas in Palestinian communities). The organization has been involved in activities like building schools, clinics, and hospitals.[9][58] In 1992, it participated in Lebanese elections for the first time, winning 12 out of 128 seats in parliament. It won 10 seats in 1996, and 8 in 2000. In the general election of 2005, it won 23 seats nationwide, and an Amal-Hezbollah alliance won all 23 seats in Southern Lebanon.
I'll tell you what, here's a challenge: I challenge you to define "terrorism" in such a way that it...
1. Is not merely synonymous with
a. "Guerrilla"
b. "Enemy"
c. "Arab"
d. "Muslim"
e. "Islamist"
f. "Hezbollah" or "Hamas", etc.
AND
2. Does not apply to either the US, UK or Israel or actions by approved allies of the same, except by explicit exclusion (i.e. "just because they're allies")
In other words, try to come up with a neutral definition that doesn't implicate us or our allies in some way. If you can, I will answer your question. Otherwise, it's just a bunch of stat-stretching emotional manipulation you're trying to feed us.
Since when did the middle east become an 'entity'. I deplore the deaths caused on Septmeber 11th. That is one of the worst atrocities I have ever witnessed. What I was laughing at was the way in which you used 9/11 to demonstrate how western civilization appears to be on the brink of crumbling apart....-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
That just shows how biased you are. No matter what you side with the middle east. September 11th is no joking matter you piece of trash.CameronPoe wrote:
Oh yeah - 3000 deaths. How many westerners are there again? LOL-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Do you remember a day called 9/11? Sit down punk.
Took you awhile to come up with that post. 9/11 was an attack on America and western civilization. If you cant see that then you are blind. Madrid, Russia, India, Canada, and America have had terrorist attacks on them or have stopped them from happening. That looks like an attack if I have ever seen one.CameronPoe wrote:
Since when did the middle east become an 'entity'. I deplore the deaths caused on Septmeber 11th. That is one of the worst atrocities I have ever witnessed. What I was laughing at was the way in which you used 9/11 to demonstrate how western civilization appears to be on the brink of crumbling apart....-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
That just shows how biased you are. No matter what you side with the middle east. September 11th is no joking matter you piece of trash.CameronPoe wrote:
Oh yeah - 3000 deaths. How many westerners are there again? LOL
Unbelievable the shit for brains some people have, when it comes to this kind of issue. . .
Defending or justifing the undefendable, and non-justified, staggers me. . .
Defending or justifing the undefendable, and non-justified, staggers me. . .
Yeah keep watching FOX News and brainrot good v. evil action movies. I won't fight fascism with fascism. You show a remarkable lack of insight. People like you WILL be responsible for the destruction of this earth.fadedsteve wrote:
You obviously have no clue of their power around the world. . . See this is pre-9/11 thought, and I am glad this sort of diarrea of the mind has not permiated our government leaders brains. Debating this to someone who has no clue that western civilization is under seige is pointless. If you don't get it, that we are at war, and our very existence and way of life is at stake than I don't know what else to say to you. . . .CameronPoe wrote:
Look here people. If you think for one moment that muslims or arabs pose any danger to the very existence of western civilisation then you're dumber than I thought. The arabs have repeatedly shown time and time again that they couldn't run a piss-up in a brewery. Do you think a small extremist minority are going to fare any better? The arabs can't even agree amongst themselves - that's their fucking problem. If you think for a minute that the Taliban are going to be in Congress or Hezbollah will be getting any seats in the Dáil - by force or by vote - then you are badly mistaken. I can't believe your outlandish views on the threat posed by Islamic militants. Newsflash: you're dreaming if you think 'Islamo-fascism' poses any threat to western values and western civilisation.
This idea that these muslims have no intent on world domination and chaos, is FOOLHARDY! Stick to playing video games buddy, cause political science AINT your bag!! Liberalism is a mental disorder, remember that! This mindset you got rockin was a similar mindset Europeans had toward Hitler. . . hmmm! Last time I checked the Nazi's were a minority party, similar to the Taliban in Afghanistan, both rose to power and terrorized their own people as well as others. Same with Hezbollah, they were small, and now have risen to be a major terrorist organization. So saying that these muslims won't be in charge anytime soon, or aren't seeking world power is mind boggling. I don't know what else to say to you other than your IN CORRECT. . .
WHen did I justify 9/11? You're just being idiotic now.fadedsteve wrote:
Unbelievable the shit for brains some people have, when it comes to this kind of issue. . .
Defending or justifing the undefendable, and non-justified, staggers me. . .
FOX news is the devil now huh? And I suppose CNN and MSNBC are ok because they are liberal? There is nothing facist about our government. We actually let our people vote, YES EVEN WOMEN. Wow what a thought. And guess what? We actually let them leave home without a male family member and sometimes, yes sometimes, we let them uncover their face.CameronPoe wrote:
Yeah keep watching FOX News and brainrot good v. evil action movies. I won't fight fascism with fascism. You show a remarkable lack of insight. People like you WILL be responsible for the destruction of this earth.fadedsteve wrote:
You obviously have no clue of their power around the world. . . See this is pre-9/11 thought, and I am glad this sort of diarrea of the mind has not permiated our government leaders brains. Debating this to someone who has no clue that western civilization is under seige is pointless. If you don't get it, that we are at war, and our very existence and way of life is at stake than I don't know what else to say to you. . . .CameronPoe wrote:
Look here people. If you think for one moment that muslims or arabs pose any danger to the very existence of western civilisation then you're dumber than I thought. The arabs have repeatedly shown time and time again that they couldn't run a piss-up in a brewery. Do you think a small extremist minority are going to fare any better? The arabs can't even agree amongst themselves - that's their fucking problem. If you think for a minute that the Taliban are going to be in Congress or Hezbollah will be getting any seats in the Dáil - by force or by vote - then you are badly mistaken. I can't believe your outlandish views on the threat posed by Islamic militants. Newsflash: you're dreaming if you think 'Islamo-fascism' poses any threat to western values and western civilisation.
This idea that these muslims have no intent on world domination and chaos, is FOOLHARDY! Stick to playing video games buddy, cause political science AINT your bag!! Liberalism is a mental disorder, remember that! This mindset you got rockin was a similar mindset Europeans had toward Hitler. . . hmmm! Last time I checked the Nazi's were a minority party, similar to the Taliban in Afghanistan, both rose to power and terrorized their own people as well as others. Same with Hezbollah, they were small, and now have risen to be a major terrorist organization. So saying that these muslims won't be in charge anytime soon, or aren't seeking world power is mind boggling. I don't know what else to say to you other than your IN CORRECT. . .
Yeah and guess what - CNN are just as bad as FOX - in the opposite direction. Newsflash: there are hundreds of thousands of news sources all across the world. And guess what? They allow women to vote here in Ireland too. And they even get to leave the house without a male family member too. Hurrah!-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
FOX news is the devil now huh? And I suppose CNN and MSNBC are ok because they are liberal? There is nothing facist about our government. We actually let our people vote, YES EVEN WOMEN. Wow what a thought. And guess what? We actually let them leave home without a male family member and sometimes, yes sometimes, we let them uncover their face.CameronPoe wrote:
Yeah keep watching FOX News and brainrot good v. evil action movies. I won't fight fascism with fascism. You show a remarkable lack of insight. People like you WILL be responsible for the destruction of this earth.fadedsteve wrote:
You obviously have no clue of their power around the world. . . See this is pre-9/11 thought, and I am glad this sort of diarrea of the mind has not permiated our government leaders brains. Debating this to someone who has no clue that western civilization is under seige is pointless. If you don't get it, that we are at war, and our very existence and way of life is at stake than I don't know what else to say to you. . . .
This idea that these muslims have no intent on world domination and chaos, is FOOLHARDY! Stick to playing video games buddy, cause political science AINT your bag!! Liberalism is a mental disorder, remember that! This mindset you got rockin was a similar mindset Europeans had toward Hitler. . . hmmm! Last time I checked the Nazi's were a minority party, similar to the Taliban in Afghanistan, both rose to power and terrorized their own people as well as others. Same with Hezbollah, they were small, and now have risen to be a major terrorist organization. So saying that these muslims won't be in charge anytime soon, or aren't seeking world power is mind boggling. I don't know what else to say to you other than your IN CORRECT. . .
Your high dude!
"Yeah keep watching FOX News and brainrot good v. evil action movies". .
Typical liberal smack talk that has no basis whatsover on the merits of this discussion.
So we shouldnt have fought the Nazi's??? So we shouldnt have removed the Taliban? So Saddam was a good guy worthy of continuing his reign of terror on his people? We shouldnt track down bin laden and kill him??
Are you fucking DAFT?
I don't like violence, I, in all intensive purposes propose peace in all circumstances. However, there are certain circumstances that cannot be allowed to continue to be ignored. We were attacked, we have to defend ourselves. Israel was attacked, she should defend herself. We have let this terrorism problem fester for 60 years, the gloves have come off now, and we must win. Negotiations have failed OBVIOUSLY!! The UN is an empty suit, and cannot be relied upon to do anything other than talk with inaction (i.e. Darfur massacre, and I could go on and on). We need to win, and violence is the only means of negotiation these terrorists understand PERIOD!
Sitting back and waiting to get buttfucked by another major terrorist attack is FUCKING INSANE!
"Yeah keep watching FOX News and brainrot good v. evil action movies". .
Typical liberal smack talk that has no basis whatsover on the merits of this discussion.
So we shouldnt have fought the Nazi's??? So we shouldnt have removed the Taliban? So Saddam was a good guy worthy of continuing his reign of terror on his people? We shouldnt track down bin laden and kill him??
Are you fucking DAFT?
I don't like violence, I, in all intensive purposes propose peace in all circumstances. However, there are certain circumstances that cannot be allowed to continue to be ignored. We were attacked, we have to defend ourselves. Israel was attacked, she should defend herself. We have let this terrorism problem fester for 60 years, the gloves have come off now, and we must win. Negotiations have failed OBVIOUSLY!! The UN is an empty suit, and cannot be relied upon to do anything other than talk with inaction (i.e. Darfur massacre, and I could go on and on). We need to win, and violence is the only means of negotiation these terrorists understand PERIOD!
Sitting back and waiting to get buttfucked by another major terrorist attack is FUCKING INSANE!
Last edited by fadedsteve (2006-07-25 03:13:07)
Where is your thread on the mistreatment of women in the middle east?CameronPoe wrote:
Yeah and guess what - CNN are just as bad as FOX - in the opposite direction. Newsflash: there are hundreds of thousands of news sources all across the world. And guess what? They allow women to vote here in Ireland too. And they even get to leave the house without a male family member too. Hurrah!-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
FOX news is the devil now huh? And I suppose CNN and MSNBC are ok because they are liberal? There is nothing facist about our government. We actually let our people vote, YES EVEN WOMEN. Wow what a thought. And guess what? We actually let them leave home without a male family member and sometimes, yes sometimes, we let them uncover their face.CameronPoe wrote:
Yeah keep watching FOX News and brainrot good v. evil action movies. I won't fight fascism with fascism. You show a remarkable lack of insight. People like you WILL be responsible for the destruction of this earth.
Last edited by -=NHB=- Bananahands (2006-07-25 03:12:31)
WHy don't you start one? I've enough on my plate with this and the 'Faith requires ignorance' thread.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Where is your thread on the mistreatment of women in the middle east?CameronPoe wrote:
Yeah and guess what - CNN are just as bad as FOX - in the opposite direction. Newsflash: there are hundreds of thousands of news sources all across the world. And guess what? They allow women to vote here in Ireland too. And they even get to leave the house without a male family member too. Hurrah!-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
FOX news is the devil now huh? And I suppose CNN and MSNBC are ok because they are liberal? There is nothing facist about our government. We actually let our people vote, YES EVEN WOMEN. Wow what a thought. And guess what? We actually let them leave home without a male family member and sometimes, yes sometimes, we let them uncover their face.
I hate to disagree with an Irishman, because half my family is Irish, but cmon guy. . .
Your killin' me here. . .
Your killin' me here. . .
Because I constantly object to the bad things that go on in the middle east. You seem to turn a blind eye to them because you are so intent on bashing Israel every chance you get.CameronPoe wrote:
WHy don't you start one? I've enough on my plate with this and the 'Faith requires ignorance' thread.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Where is your thread on the mistreatment of women in the middle east?CameronPoe wrote:
Yeah and guess what - CNN are just as bad as FOX - in the opposite direction. Newsflash: there are hundreds of thousands of news sources all across the world. And guess what? They allow women to vote here in Ireland too. And they even get to leave the house without a male family member too. Hurrah!
Steve - you're catching the tail end of a very very long debate. If you want more sensible debating go to an earlier page of the thread where I talk about various aspects of middle east history, where I state several times that I don't condone what Hezbollah are doing and where I argue various other points in a serious manner. I've received over 30 karma on this thread alone. I wouldn't let this page and the last ruin the entire thread.fadedsteve wrote:
I hate to disagree with an Irishman, because half my family is Irish, but cmon guy. . .
Your killin' me here. . .
Argueing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics, even if you win, your still RETARDED!!
Personally I dont care about any other thread or karma you recieved on this issue. I havent seen you on Hardball anytime soon, so I dont think you are an authority on the issue. Good luck to you, I dont have any animosity towards you. . .
Headed for bed!
Personally I dont care about any other thread or karma you recieved on this issue. I havent seen you on Hardball anytime soon, so I dont think you are an authority on the issue. Good luck to you, I dont have any animosity towards you. . .
Headed for bed!
Last edited by fadedsteve (2006-07-25 03:23:12)