JahManRed
wank
+646|6868|IRELAND

Its obvious from reading the above posts that both parties are bias and won't see eye to eye no matter how much we discuss this.
I like Cameron draw allot of parallels to current wars and occupations to what has happened here in Ireland. The Irish see the IRA in its early days IS what forced the British government to grant the Irish in N.Ireland basic human rights, one man one vote etc. I wouldn't say that its 'Propaganda' by any stretch. Like Poe I live in an occupied country and therefore we have experience. The reason Bloody Sunday is referred to is because it was the biggest recruiting Sargent in IRA history. An atrocity committed by an occupying force which transformed the IRA from a small movement to a well organized guerrilla force. Same think is happening in Iraqi and Palestine. Both countries are talked about quite allot here.
"It was provoked by some pikey kids throwing rocks" WTF would you know huh? Did you by any chance have a look at the bloody Sunday commissions findings? They are available on the net. Before you cast random untrue bullshit around, at least have a look and find out the facts. After all this is serious talk not made up talk.

And the reason the Irish were over tarmacking your drives was because our country was oppressed into such a state that the only work that could be found was in England. And in fact the trend has now reversed. I was in Dublin 2 weeks ago and every man in a hole in a road was from an English contractor, because Ireland is now booming.
Force an English man is going to defend his country.....but if you took the trouble to look at it from an unbiased angle you would have to agree that England has done more harm that good in Ireland over the years.

On a side note. I worked for an Ex RUC special branch officer for 5 years and he left because if the collusion between his colleges and terrorist organizations such as the UDA and UVF, the British security forces gave out information to terrorists to kill solicitors and other people. He also mentioned and Ive read it in a few places that the IRA at the height of the troubles was the best intelligence gathering army in the world after the Israeli army. So they were not a bunch of thick paddies running around shooting randomly as you insinuate.

Last edited by JahManRed (2006-06-16 06:36:46)

Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6802
On the topic of Britain and the US assisting terrorist activities, we could discuss Indonesia............
JahManRed
wank
+646|6868|IRELAND

Ohh and Ireland doesn't have the highest rate of Suicide in Europe (4th in the world), it is Northern Ireland, the bit thats still occupied by the British. The Republic Of Ireland has a normal rate.
I don't blame this on the British directly, I blame it on our politicians. The people of the North have an Identity crises. Britain doesn't want us. (even the torries wanted rid off us when they were in power and has secret talks about it with the Shinners) The republic doesn't want us now either as their economy is going so well they don't want to bring on their dysfunctional neighbors to mess it up for them, which it would IMO.
Seems to be allot of chat in other threads about the Ireland England thing, maybe we should start a thread dedicated to this topic?

Last edited by JahManRed (2006-06-16 06:55:20)

=OBS= EstebanRey
Member
+256|6791|Oxford, England, UK, EU, Earth

JahManRed wrote:

An atrocity committed by an occupying force which transformed the IRA from a small movement to a well organized guerrilla force. Same think is happening in Iraqi and Palestine. Both countries are talked about quite allot here.
"occupying force"?  We 'invaded' in the 1100s, this happened over 800 years later.  You don't have "occupying forces" for 800 years.......

JahManRed wrote:

"It was provoked by some pikey kids throwing rocks" WTF would you know huh?
Um.....

from wiki "The march's planned route had taken it to the Guildhall, but due to army barricades it was redirected to Free Derry Corner. A small group of teenagers broke off from the main march and persisted in pushing the barricade and marching on the Guildhall. They attacked the British barricade with stones and shouted insults at the troops. At this point, a water cannon, tear gas and rubber bullets were used to disperse the rioters."

JahManRed wrote:

but if you took the trouble to look at it from an unbiased angle you would have to agree that England has done more harm that good in Ireland over the years.
Pure speculation unless you have a time machine and can fend off the British in 1100 to tell us how Ireland would have turned out.  Your country would not be what it is today without the history it has.  If you could press a button and reverse any British involvement in Ireland would you do it, even though the outcome would be totally unpredictable?

JahManRed wrote:

Ive read it in a few places that the IRA at the height of the troubles was the best intelligence gathering army in the world after the Israeli army. So they were not a bunch of thick paddies running around shooting randomly as you insinuate.
Oh right, but with all this "intelligence" they didn't realise that a British spy and been in their ranks for decades!  Yeah, really intelligent!

P.S CameronPoe, Ireland is NOT the place with the highest standards of living as you have mentioned time and time before.  It's Norway, followed by the US. Ireland (and the UK for that matter) don't even get into the top 10........
=OBS= EstebanRey
Member
+256|6791|Oxford, England, UK, EU, Earth

JahManRed wrote:

Ohh and Ireland doesn't have the highest rate of Suicide in Europe (4th in the world), it is Northern Ireland, the bit thats still occupied by the British.
Bullshit, it's Lithuania.  Any Qi viewer could tell you this as Sweden is the popular myth.
xXSarnathXx
Decepticons forever!
+25|6848|Sweden
i dislike the foreign politics US are pushin around, and thats about it, also i dislike all ignorant morons who (usually) live on the country side and are way to patriotic and wanna-bee heroistic for their own good. those idiots is what fuels the foreign politics of the US and thats what i dislike, but dont get me wrong. we have them over here aswell, but since Sweden isnt the only superpower in the world our morons cant create as much damage as yours.

im quite certain all countries got them, the "enligthened" city people vs the "ignorant" country people (is it fair to generalize like that?)

and since the country people almost always are in population majority its alwost always the crappy politics that are voted thru.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6796

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

An atrocity committed by an occupying force which transformed the IRA from a small movement to a well organized guerrilla force. Same think is happening in Iraqi and Palestine. Both countries are talked about quite allot here.
"occupying force"?  We 'invaded' in the 1100s, this happened over 800 years later.  You don't have "occupying forces" for 800 years.......

JahManRed wrote:

"It was provoked by some pikey kids throwing rocks" WTF would you know huh?
Um.....

from wiki "The march's planned route had taken it to the Guildhall, but due to army barricades it was redirected to Free Derry Corner. A small group of teenagers broke off from the main march and persisted in pushing the barricade and marching on the Guildhall. They attacked the British barricade with stones and shouted insults at the troops. At this point, a water cannon, tear gas and rubber bullets were used to disperse the rioters."

JahManRed wrote:

but if you took the trouble to look at it from an unbiased angle you would have to agree that England has done more harm that good in Ireland over the years.
Pure speculation unless you have a time machine and can fend off the British in 1100 to tell us how Ireland would have turned out.  Your country would not be what it is today without the history it has.  If you could press a button and reverse any British involvement in Ireland would you do it, even though the outcome would be totally unpredictable?

JahManRed wrote:

Ive read it in a few places that the IRA at the height of the troubles was the best intelligence gathering army in the world after the Israeli army. So they were not a bunch of thick paddies running around shooting randomly as you insinuate.
Oh right, but with all this "intelligence" they didn't realise that a British spy and been in their ranks for decades!  Yeah, really intelligent!

P.S CameronPoe, Ireland is NOT the place with the highest standards of living as you have mentioned time and time before.  It's Norway, followed by the US. Ireland (and the UK for that matter) don't even get into the top 10........
EstebanRey - The Economist has us with the highest 'Quality of Life' not 'Standard of Living' and we do have the second highest GDP in Europe (2nd to Luxembourg).

FYI: Occupying forces last until they are no longer occupying the land they invaded/stole. Hence the UK are an occcupying force in Northern Ireland and have been for 800 years. You think there's a 'cut-off point' for occupation or something!?!?!

If there was a button which could remove the brits from our history I'd press it in a flash. We would have our beautiful language back as strong as it was when the Brits invaded, proper infrastructure, and possibly more cordial relations with our neighbours across the water.

Also, you think there aren't/weren't IRA spies in the British military/intelligence community? You get informers and spies on both sides of any conflict.
JahManRed
wank
+646|6868|IRELAND

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

An atrocity committed by an occupying force which transformed the IRA from a small movement to a well organized guerrilla force. Same think is happening in Iraqi and Palestine. Both countries are talked about quite allot here.
"occupying force"?  We 'invaded' in the 1100s, this happened over 800 years later.  You don't have "occupying forces" for 800 years.......

JahManRed
Im not even going to answer that. Poe has done so.

JahManRed wrote:

"It was provoked by some pikey kids throwing rocks" WTF would you know huh?
Um.....

from wiki "The march's planned route had taken it to the Guildhall, but due to army barricades it was redirected to Free Derry Corner. A small group of teenagers broke off from the main march and persisted in pushing the barricade and marching on the Guildhall. They attacked the British barricade with stones and shouted insults at the troops. At this point, a water cannon, tear gas and rubber bullets were used to disperse the rioters."

JahManRed
Sorry I forgot Wiki is the holly grail of information. Look I didn't want to have to spend the time explaining this again but here goes: The Catholic people in Northern Ireland up to the mid 1960s didn't have basic human rights. The unionist ruling classes along with the British manufactured a voting system that meant that even in predominately nationalist/Catholic areas (up to 98%) the ppl were not represented by their own politicians but from unionist politicians hell bend on suppressing nationalism. I equate this to German politicians setting policies in England. Also the British at the time were locking up Nationalists without trial, so up to 15 years. Without any way of challenging this internment due to having no politicians to represent them, they took to the streets in protest. 
The way you try and justify the killing of 13 un armed human beings because  kids chucked rocks is sickening. The riots in the North of england recently didn't provoke the police to open fire on the crowd who were being much more aggressive. Here is a quote from your fellow country man who was involved at the time and seen the evidence before it been washed and twisted by the British government.


This Sunday became known as Bloody Sunday and bloody it was. It was quite unnecessary. It strikes me that the Army ran amok that day and shot without thinking what they were doing. They were shooting innocent people. These people may have been taking part in a march that was banned but that does not justify the troops coming in and firing live rounds indiscriminately. I would say without hesitation that it was sheer, unadulterated murder. It was murder.
Major Hubert O'Neill, the Coroner in a statement issued on 21 August 1973


https://www.irishnews.com/priest.jpg
John 'Jack' Duddy (17)
Jack Duddy was killed by a single shot that passed through his upper chest from right to left and slightly forward. Four witnesses, Edward Daly, then a Catholic priest, Mrs Bonner, Mrs Duffy and Mr Tucker, all stated that Duddy was unarmed at the time he was shot and that he was running away from soldiers when he was shot. Three of these witness stated that they saw a soldier take deliberate aim at Duddy as he fled across the courtyard of Rossville Flats. Lord Widgery concluded that he was hit by a bullet mean for someone else. Jack Duddy was probably the first person to be shot dead on 'Bloody Sunday'.

Thats a 17 year old kid with his life ahead of him, shot for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. You try and justify this Guilty by association crap.



JahManRed wrote:

but if you took the trouble to look at it from an unbiased angle you would have to agree that England has done more harm that good in Ireland over the years.
Pure speculation unless you have a time machine and can fend off the British in 1100 to tell us how Ireland would have turned out.  Your country would not be what it is today without the history it has.  If you could press a button and reverse any British involvement in Ireland would you do it, even though the outcome would be totally unpredictable?


JahManRed
Ok you invated in the 1100s, you seem quite poud of this fact. The enlish systematically tried to wipe out the Irish people by breeding them out as they did in Scotland (seen braveheart? that bit wasn't fiction) by impregnating a newly married woman.
Queen Victoria cut down all our beautiful woods and forest to build a vast fleet to try and take over the world leaving us still to this day with the least amount of woodlands in Europe. I could go on............. the irish ppl have never gotten an appology for this.
To answer your question, Without a doubt I would if I could go back in time and reverse any British Involvement in Ireland through the years.


JahManRed wrote:

Ive read it in a few places that the IRA at the height of the troubles was the best intelligence gathering army in the world after the Israeli army. So they were not a bunch of thick paddies running around shooting randomly as you insinuate.
Oh right, but with all this "intelligence" they didn't realize that a British spy and been in their ranks for decades!  Yeah, really intelligent!

P.S CameronPoe, Ireland is NOT the place with the highest standards of living as you have mentioned time and time before.  It's Norway, followed by the US. Ireland (and the UK for that matter) don't even get into the top 10........
JahManRed
I presume you are talking about Denis Donaldson the British Informer? I stated "at the height of the troubles" Donaldson was recruited/forced to become an informer well after the peek of IRA activities. Also if you believe the sources and media I hear, here on the ground, Donaldson was hounded by special branch over a misdemeanor and given a choice of informer or we will make you and your families lifes hell. A typical Special Branch tactic.


I know I havent done the quote shit right, but I havent time, gota do some work.

Last edited by JahManRed (2006-06-16 08:44:22)

=OBS= EstebanRey
Member
+256|6791|Oxford, England, UK, EU, Earth

CameronPoe wrote:

FYI: Occupying forces last until they are no longer occupying the land they invaded/stole. Hence the UK are an occcupying force in Northern Ireland and have been for 800 years. You think there's a 'cut-off point' for occupation or something!?!?!
With that reasoning, Americans are "occupying" Texas (They "stole" that from the Mexicans), 9888888888% of Australians are "occupying" the abbos land in Australia and there are hundreds of millions of "occupiers" in the States.  If you say occupation has no time limit then the majority of the World is occupied in one way or another....

CameronPoe wrote:

If there was a button which could remove the brits from our history I'd press it in a flash. We would have our beautiful language back as strong as it was when the Brits invaded, proper infrastructure, and possibly more cordial relations with our neighbours across the water.
Yet more speculation.  You have no proof that would have happened and I could argue just as easily that you would be isolated from the rest of the World but both are pure hypothtical opinions that will never be proved either way.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6802

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

With that reasoning, Americans are "occupying" Texas (They "stole" that from the Mexicans),
No, because the Texans aren't asking for independence.

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

9888888888% of Australians are "occupying" the abbos land in Australia
That would be a reasonable statement, with the exception that I'm not sure how you can get more than 100% (except with, say, engines where the tested limit is 100% and everything beyond that is untested and possibliy unsafe etc.)

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

and there are hundreds of millions of "occupiers" in the States.  If you say occupation has no time limit then the majority of the World is occupied in one way or another....
There's no time limit, it's about what forces are doing.  British forces in Ireland were actively engaged in combatting Irish rebels, and as such were occupying.  If the Irish had done nothing to fight back, it would not be fair to call them occupiers.
=OBS= EstebanRey
Member
+256|6791|Oxford, England, UK, EU, Earth

Bubbalo wrote:

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

With that reasoning, Americans are "occupying" Texas (They "stole" that from the Mexicans),
No, because the Texans aren't asking for independence.
And nor are the majority of the Northern Irish, it's mostly ROI people who want a country they don't even live in to have an independence that a lot of of people actually living in N.I don't want.

Bubbalo wrote:

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

and there are hundreds of millions of "occupiers" in the States.  If you say occupation has no time limit then the majority of the World is occupied in one way or another....
There's no time limit, it's about what forces are doing.  British forces in Ireland were actively engaged in combatting Irish rebels, and as such were occupying.  If the Irish had done nothing to fight back, it would not be fair to call them occupiers.
The key word here is "were".  You've already said it in past tence when the original accusation was aimed at us occupying now and was also directed at the indiginous people of N.I that want to be part of the UK.

Some of you have a really strange view on land ownership.  How far do you think I'd get if I was born in California and decided that I wanted to take the land back for the native indians and make it an independant country.  Do you think Bush would just say, "fair enough you were here first"?  Of course not, he would probably throw me in jail.......
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6796

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

FYI: Occupying forces last until they are no longer occupying the land they invaded/stole. Hence the UK are an occcupying force in Northern Ireland and have been for 800 years. You think there's a 'cut-off point' for occupation or something!?!?!
With that reasoning, Americans are "occupying" Texas (They "stole" that from the Mexicans), 9888888888% of Australians are "occupying" the abbos land in Australia and there are hundreds of millions of "occupiers" in the States.  If you say occupation has no time limit then the majority of the World is occupied in one way or another....

CameronPoe wrote:

If there was a button which could remove the brits from our history I'd press it in a flash. We would have our beautiful language back as strong as it was when the Brits invaded, proper infrastructure, and possibly more cordial relations with our neighbours across the water.
Yet more speculation.  You have no proof that would have happened and I could argue just as easily that you would be isolated from the rest of the World but both are pure hypothtical opinions that will never be proved either way.
Whether you deem your country to be occupied or not depends on whether you are the occupied or the occupier. If the Brits had ethnically cleansed all the Irish people from the island of Ireland (as early US settlers did with many Native Americans tribes) then you would have noone to argue that Ireland was being occupied. As it turned out they didn't and about 45% of people in the six counties and nearly 100 % of people in the Republic of Ireland see our land as having been occupied and that that occupation is continuing. The Mexicans and Aborigines lands have been occupied but they no longer seek to have it returned to them, that is the difference.

EstebanRay - I'd take my chances with the button. The certain knowledge of untold death, disease, mistreatment, pain, anguish and subjugation is enough of a reason to press it. I find your imperious attitude frightening - what do think the british did for Ireland only cause us suffering? What right had you to have anything to do with our country? Try, TRY, and think about what you would do if the shoe was on the other foot...

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-06-16 09:10:26)

=OBS= EstebanRey
Member
+256|6791|Oxford, England, UK, EU, Earth

CameronPoe wrote:

As it turned out they didn't and about 45% of native Irish people in the six counties and nearly 100 % of people in the Republic of Ireland see our land as having been occupied and that that occupation is continuing. The Mexicans and Aborigines lands have been occupied but they no longer seek to have it returned to them, that is the difference.

EstebanRay - I'd take my chances with the button. The certain knowledge of untold death, disease, mistreatment and subjugation is enough of a reason to press it.
45% is a minority. 

Bubbaloo, a little history, in 1921 the British gave Ireland to chance to become completely independant of Britain and this included the option for N.I to vote for an opt out of the UK as well.  As it happened, the people of Northern Ireland voted to stay with the UK.   The US always bangs on about how good democracy is and N.I democratically voted to stay in the UK. 

So, if you can define an "occupier" as a nation that is defending the people that voted to stay alligned with them, then we are occupying N.I (and you havea very strange definition of occupation that I'm sure the OED would be keen to hear)
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6802

CameronPoe wrote:

Aborigines lands have been occupied but they no longer seek to have it returned to them, that is the difference.
Half truth, they do seek native title ownership in some areas in accordance with strict guidelines, but the federal government still holds ultimate control, same as any old ordinary block of land (also a half truth, federal government can only intervene in some matters, others are entirely in the hands of the state governments.  Territories, however, are subject to every whim of the federal government, and I'm sure you all needed to know all this).

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

And nor are the majority of the Northern Irish, it's mostly ROI people who want a country they don't even live in to have an independence that a lot of of people actually living in N.I don't want.
No, but as I understand it we are talking about Ireland more generally, and the southern part certainly wanted independence.

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

The key word here is "were".  You've already said it in past tence when the original accusation was aimed at us occupying now and was also directed at the indiginous people of N.I that want to be part of the UK.
Yes, were, as in now that they've left, and Ireland is free........but then, I think this is the same misunderstanding as part I.

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

Some of you have a really strange view on land ownership.
I don't think it's that strange.  If you have a country, and someone marches in and takes it by force, then no matter how long they sit there, the land is still yours.  Or is there an expiry date on justice?

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

How far do you think I'd get if I was born in California and decided that I wanted to take the land back for the native indians and make it an independant country.  Do you think Bush would just say, "fair enough you were here first"?  Of course not, he would probably throw me in jail.......
So Bush is our moral compass now?  Oh dear god, we're all screwed.

Last edited by Bubbalo (2006-06-16 09:16:01)

CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6796

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

As it turned out they didn't and about 45% of native Irish people in the six counties and nearly 100 % of people in the Republic of Ireland see our land as having been occupied and that that occupation is continuing. The Mexicans and Aborigines lands have been occupied but they no longer seek to have it returned to them, that is the difference.

EstebanRay - I'd take my chances with the button. The certain knowledge of untold death, disease, mistreatment and subjugation is enough of a reason to press it.
45% is a minority. 

Bubbaloo, a little history, in 1921 the British gave Ireland to chance to become completely independant of Britain and this included the option for N.I to vote for an opt out of the UK as well.  As it happened, the people of Northern Ireland voted to stay with the UK.   The US always bangs on about how good democracy is and N.I democratically voted to stay in the UK. 

So, if you can define an "occupier" as a nation that is defending the people that voted to stay alligned with them, then we are occupying N.I (and you havea very strange definition of occupation that I'm sure the OED would be keen to hear)
Point: In 1921 'Northern Ireland', as you know it, didn't exist. As such, if the entire population of Ireland were asked if they wanted independence then the whole island would have been returned. The creation of an artificial state which never previously existed is the reason for todays problems. I don't recognise this as having been a legitimate action and hence still lay claim to the land that the brits have occupied. I'll get my wish in a few generations though - Republicans will outvote Unionists in a few generations time, given Catholic birthrates!! Tiocfaidh ár lá! Our day will come!

I think Esteban has trouble recognising that Ireland is one indivisible island in the eyes of history and justice. The Brits invaded the ISLAND of Ireland. They didn't invade Northern Ireland and then decide to go for the country to the south - because at that time Ireland was one entity.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-06-16 09:34:09)

Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6802

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

Bubbaloo, a little history, in 1921 the British gave Ireland to chance to become completely independant of Britain and this included the option for N.I to vote for an opt out of the UK as well.  As it happened, the people of Northern Ireland voted to stay with the UK.   The US always bangs on about how good democracy is and N.I democratically voted to stay in the UK.
I don't see what the US opinion has to do with me
=OBS= EstebanRey
Member
+256|6791|Oxford, England, UK, EU, Earth
Jahmenred please don't use "guilt trip" style stories and pictures to put your side across of the argument because you know there are 1000s of more horific stories and pics to come out of the IRA's sickening activities.  Here is just one of the "campaigns the IRA undertook (for those who don't know, these people hold the same views as Jah and Camronpoe on Ireland and are willing to do this). 

At 3.10pm on Saturday, August 15th, 1998, a 500Ib car bomb exploded in Market Street, Omagh. It caused carnage on a scale never before seen in Northern Ireland. A total of 29 people were killed, as well as two unborn children, and hundreds were injured in the IRA atrocity. At the time, many felt it was the outrage to end all killings. Sadly, this has not been the case. Today, relatives of three victims talk about their feelings, as we approach the third anniversary of the Omagh 'massacre'.

Below are all the victims of the IRA who were massacre as they went about their daily lives. The only picture missing is the picture of the two unborn twins.

https://www.battlehill395.freeserve.co.uk/Omagh%20bomb%20victims.jpg
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6802

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

(for those who don't know, these people hold the same views as Jah and Camronpoe on Ireland and are willing to do this).
Low blow, dude.  That's like saying we should allow abortion (and IMHO we should, just for the record) on the basis that some anti-abortionists are terrorists, and therefore all anti-abortionists are evil.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6796

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

Jahmenred please don't use "guilt trip" style stories and pictures to put your side across of the argument because you know there are 1000s of more horific stories and pics to come out of the IRA's sickening activities.  Here is just one of the "campaigns the IRA undertook (for those who don't know, these people hold the same views as Jah and Camronpoe on Ireland and are willing to do this). 

At 3.10pm on Saturday, August 15th, 1998, a 500Ib car bomb exploded in Market Street, Omagh. It caused carnage on a scale never before seen in Northern Ireland. A total of 29 people were killed, as well as two unborn children, and hundreds were injured in the IRA atrocity. At the time, many felt it was the outrage to end all killings. Sadly, this has not been the case. Today, relatives of three victims talk about their feelings, as we approach the third anniversary of the Omagh 'massacre'.

Below are all the victims of the IRA who were massacre as they went about their daily lives. The only picture missing is the picture of the two unborn twins.

http://www.battlehill395.freeserve.co.u … ictims.jpg
How do I alert a mod? This is a blatant blackening of my name for no reason. I DO NOT AND HAVE NEVER CONDONED THE TAKING OF CIVILIAN LIVES. You are one serious little cuntbag. What kind of slur is this!?!?! Are you thick or something - have you read anything I've said. It's like all of your opinions of me are just presumptins based on things you think I might think.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6802
The grey "report" button next to karma alerts a mod, but I don't think this is really the right situation.  Could be wrong though, only one way to find out.
=OBS= EstebanRey
Member
+256|6791|Oxford, England, UK, EU, Earth
Okay let me clear this up,

I said "for those who don't know, these people hold the same views as Jah and Camronpoe on Ireland".  Notice the bit on the end? "On Ireland" not on the killing of innocent people.  I meant that they believe the 55% of people of N.I that democratically voted to stay part of the UK are wrong to hold that opinion and it should be discarded to allow a complete Republic.

I do not believe that either Cameron or Jah condone the killings of innocent people but both of them drag up the attrocities of Bloody Sunday whilst not offsetting it with what the IRA have done over the years.  They want to advertise the acts of the British concerning this one incident, whilst not talking about the many, many incidents the IRA have created.

Sorry if there was any confusion........

P.S, How can I "blacken" an anonymous internet poster?  I don't even know you and the opposite is true.  This is a forum not a real life political discussion.  Lighten up

Last edited by =OBS= EstebanRey (2006-06-16 09:53:46)

Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6802
I knew that was what you were saying, but it automatically creates a link to them (Poe and JahMan) at the same time as going on about how bad the IRA were/are.  If you'd just said "These are the poeple who want a free Ireland", I'm sure that most people would be smart enough to know that that's what Poe and JahMan were saying.  I'm sure most already knew, given that the IRA feature in much of the conversation.
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7006|UK
Just to Poe and JahMan no one OWNS land, the land was here before we were around and it will still be there when we are gone, however if people CHOOSE to be part of a community in this case UK it is their right to do so. If people in NI dont want to be part of UK then theres always Ireland where they can live with other people of a similar mind frame.

edit - changed Great Britain for UK for that spacktard.

Last edited by Vilham (2006-06-16 12:16:19)

=OBS= EstebanRey
Member
+256|6791|Oxford, England, UK, EU, Earth

Bubbalo wrote:

If you'd just said "These are the poeple who want a free Ireland"
That implies that Ireland isn't free at the moment when it is....
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6796

=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

If you'd just said "These are the poeple who want a free Ireland"
That implies that Ireland isn't free at the moment when it is....
I think you'll find almost half of the people of northern ireland don't share that view.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard