well ive thought she was an idiot for a very long time due to previous comments, my opinion of her is swayed little by this
Do-able!
Being RIGHT, seems to have helped Hannity in his debates. lolspastic bullet wrote:
Franken is a terrible debater -- he gets all bent out of shape way too easily. But Hannity is like the Harlem Globetrotters to Colmes' Washington Capitals. Colmes is all "Durrr, ya gots me agian, Sean! How is yuo so good wiht teh LOGIC and shit?! LOLZ"lowing wrote:
Ya know, Al Franken and Hannity would be an interesting debate to watch.......My money on Hannityyerded wrote:
I'll say.
No wonder Hannity looks good when he's up against that. It's probably made him a weak debater, though. And he looks like Jay Leno.
Right about what? The guy works for Fox, no? If you don't want to read it (it's not long), just scroll down to the chart. The numbers are pretty amazing, even to a cynic like me.lowing wrote:
Being RIGHT, seems to have helped Hannity in his debates. lol
Now that is pretty interesting.........My only questions would be: how was the poll conducted?spastic bullet wrote:
Right about what? The guy works for Fox, no? If you don't want to read it (it's not long), just scroll down to the chart. The numbers are pretty amazing, even to a cynic like me.lowing wrote:
Being RIGHT, seems to have helped Hannity in his debates. lol
If I polled 100 people and asked what do you like better hamburgeres or a snake bite? I could "concluded" that the majority of those polled liked hamburgers. Not an acurate poll.
Polling is probably the least likely acurate measure of public opinion becvause the questions asked can be so easily biased.
The questions can be biased in any measure of public opinion.lowing wrote:
Polling is probably the least likely acurate measure of public opinion becvause the questions asked can be so easily biased.
Exactly, for instance the CURRENT war in Iraq IS against terrorists that DID have something to do with 9/11, the war before Saddam surrendered was not, was there a difference delineated in the poll? They also only referenced one question, did they stop people after only one question? Polls in all cases are conducted by humans and are subject to influence, which is why I, like I do with wikipedia's am skeptical of all poll results whether or not they support my argument and I try to avoid referencing them. For instance I could start a poll that asks: Has you mother ever caught you while you masturbated with her underwear? yes or nolowing wrote:
Now that is pretty interesting.........My only questions would be: how was the poll conducted?spastic bullet wrote:
Right about what? The guy works for Fox, no? If you don't want to read it (it's not long), just scroll down to the chart. The numbers are pretty amazing, even to a cynic like me.lowing wrote:
Being RIGHT, seems to have helped Hannity in his debates. lol
If I polled 100 people and asked what do you like better hamburgeres or a snake bite? I could "concluded" that the majority of those polled liked hamburgers. Not an acurate poll.
Polling is probably the least likely acurate measure of public opinion becvause the questions asked can be so easily biased.
This would imply that you masturbated with her underwear no matter whcih answer you chose.
And getting back to the important discussion, I would do her.....alot.
"Today 02:53:30 -1 Ann Coulter at it again ' idiot '-unsigned (like all the others)" yay!!!!
whoever keeps leaving me these gems, WOW! you are so on top of things and have convinced me of my erroneous ways
Last edited by kr@cker (2006-06-07 05:42:48)
I'm so happy that my own sense of right and wrong decides these kind of things and that I don't rely on polls or world opinions.spastic bullet wrote:
Right about what? The guy works for Fox, no? If you don't want to read it (it's not long), just scroll down to the chart. The numbers are pretty amazing, even to a cynic like me.lowing wrote:
Being RIGHT, seems to have helped Hannity in his debates. lol
My distrust and hatred for politicians is such that I always assume they are lying. Always.
I still support the overall long term objectives as they appear to be from a military world view perspective.
Nice find though.
Funny it is more an indication of a natural corollary event in humans - rather than just a poll.spastic bullet wrote:
Right about what? The guy works for Fox, no? If you don't want to read it (it's not long), just scroll down to the chart. The numbers are pretty amazing, even to a cynic like me.lowing wrote:
Being RIGHT, seems to have helped Hannity in his debates. lol
The less you actually know - the more inclined you are to have a definite opinion.
I'd do her...upside the head with my "Get a fucking clue" stick.
I bet he works that doll hardGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
http://contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/penn%20has%20torture%20doll_27_03_2006
at least Ag's sticking to the basics<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:
i win
Last edited by kr@cker (2006-06-07 12:20:11)
I saw nothing close to owning in there, anyway, read my first post, she's not talking about all the victim families, coulter is referring to the small group being used as tools to try to turn the Bush admin into the scapegoat for 9-11, and they don't even realize it, I've known plenty of other people that have caught a bad case of wrongful death, and their families aren't using it for petty material gains like these nobs. Funny how all the evidence for culpability leads back to her husband, so she (Hillary) takes up for this small group that blames Bush.
I tried that same argument in the Bush/Kerry election race.lowing wrote:
And what "documentaries" has she made??Marconius wrote:
She's a lying liar and does nothing but tell lies.
Just ask Al Franken. She's basically the Right-wing's version of Michael Moore.
Ann Coulter.. . attorney who worked for the Senate Judiciary Committee, columnist, editor, author.
Al Franken.........actor, comedian, entertainer.......(Stuart Smally), author.
Micheal Moore.......movie producer, dunken doughnuts poster child.
Hmmmmmm. I guess you can judge resumes on these three as to who may be more educated in the nature of freedom and politics.
Why didnt Kerry win even though his resume was far superior to Bush's?
Ann Coulter is a tool.
Last edited by rawls2 (2006-06-07 15:14:09)
i kinda like her, plus she's way hotter than the other republican voice: RUSH!
I hate her but I'd still do her. I would probably do her anal just to pay her back for all those annoying opinions.<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:
Yes she is doable but she is still a fucking nazi cunt. That fact alone would make me turn down an offer of sex from her.
And she's too fucking boney to.. I need a woman with MEAT. WOMEN WHO EAT SANDWICHES ONCE IN A WHILE.
Last edited by rawls2 (2006-06-07 15:34:49)
agree or disagree with her viewpoints.... regardless.... who would you rather do: her, or rush? her or o'reilley?? im sticking it to ann for now
http://www.annoy.com/img/postcards/ann- … ime_pc.jpg
here is something I found on google
***BE WARNED IT IS PORNO***
here is something I found on google
***BE WARNED IT IS PORNO***