BF2S Forums Too many one sided servers

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

Ungh. There's way too many servers where one side wins all day long. It gets annoying. I mean I'm good, I can help my team win, but I'm only one man. It'd be nice if people would try to even the teams up talent wise to get us some good close games. But no, everyone is too worried about their damn stats so they all join the stacked team.

Just a rant I guess. Not really proposing anything other than people should stop worrying about their stupid K/D ratios and just have fun. Even the teams up a bit and lets have some good close nailbiters.

Yeah, hate it, especially because I abhor team-switching.  But funny as it is, sometimes, it's easier to get medals when you are on the losing team.    Sad, but I've seen a good many games where the losing team took all the medals.

Fully agree. Best games are balanced games. Being owned like hell isn't fun, but owning n00bs isn't fun too.

A "intelligent  team balance" would be nice. Depending on the points earned the round before, players will be put into the teams balanced. I mean three 50-points-player on MEC and three 50-points-player on US side in the next round.

I hear you man, I had to remove a sever from my favorites because of this.

Happened again this morning on War is Hell. I was constantly getting the most kills out of anyone as infantry and my team couldn't even win sharqi as mec. USMC won like 7 rounds in a row easily until I said screw it.

I wholely agree! There is simply nothing like going down to the finish with the ticket count close. It makes for a much better game experience...

There are so may Privates, Corporals and even Sergeant playing now... It is soooo much fun joining a server and the side you end up on has all the newbies and the other side is all Sergeants Majors and above... Oh joy!

My wish is that there would be some way of balancing by rank. I would like that would be pretty difficult to do though...

polarbearz wrote:

Balancing up by rank would be nice

No, that would suck.  I play with players who are good and we have a good time playing.  It wouldn't be fun if we were all put on opposite teams.  For example, I play with BushViper and he is a beast on ground and in vehicles.  It is only fun to go against him every once and a while.  Not every round.

<b|k> lukie wrote:

A "intelligent  team balance" would be nice. Depending on the points earned the round before, players will be put into the teams balanced. I mean three 50-points-player on MEC and three 50-points-player on US side in the next round.

This would suck aswell.  Just because somebody got a lot of points that round doesn't exactly mean that they are that good at the game.  If they were good though then this would be a punishment by switching them to the losing team.

The best way to deal with being on the losing team is to get a few friends together and a good squad and start to win.

my cock is a bushviper

<b|k> lukie wrote:

Fully agree. Best games are balanced games. Being owned like hell isn't fun, but owning n00bs isn't fun too.

A "intelligent  team balance" would be nice. Depending on the points earned the round before, players will be put into the teams balanced. I mean three 50-points-player on MEC and three 50-points-player on US side in the next round.

Not a bad idea, But maybe it should be done by squad.  It would suck to find a squad that can really work well together and then have it split between teams.  The game should encourage squad play, because good squads can rule the lone wolfs.