BF2S Forums Whats your Opinion on Homosexuality?

MaddOps wrote:

My personal opinion(s):
3) Those who talk loudest are the ones who are most likely "different" themselves.
And hate themselves for it.   You mention anything a little "sideways" to them and it's, "That's f****n' sick. That's perverted.  Those people are wrong." And they just seem to get violently angry about it.
That's usually a sign in my book.  Why get pissed?  If it ain't for you, it ain't for you.  But why get angry?

Not so long ago, barbarian tribes drank the blood of the dead.  Aztecs sacrificed virgins to their gods. Spartans threw newborns off a cliff that didn't display certain qualities aproved by the elders.  At one point someone stood up and said, "That's f****n' sick. That's perverted. Those people are wrong."  Today, those people are shunned as having a closed mind.

Pubic wrote:

wannabe_tank_whore wrote:

Not so long ago, barbarian tribes drank the blood of the dead.  Aztecs sacrificed virgins to their gods. Spartans threw newborns off a cliff that didn't display certain qualities aproved by the elders.  At one point someone stood up and said, "That's f****n' sick. That's perverted. Those people are wrong."  Today, those people are shunned as having a closed mind.

Gays don't run round butchering people in the name of eugenics or religion.

What about Napoleon???  "The evidence clearly shows he was French, thus, he was gay!" hehehehehehe

Last edited by lowing (2006-04-10 19:49:00)

lowing wrote:

What about Napoleon???  "The evidence clearly shows he was French, thus, he was gay!" hehehehehehe

I heard he was just pissed because he was 'short'. *wink*

What, my clever innuendo wasn't picked up on? Drat.

Skruples wrote:

What, my clever innuendo wasn't picked up on? Drat.

it was probably picked up on, it is just a sensative issue for must of us lol

Major_Spittle wrote:

Brikiin118 wrote:

I just wanted to check with the BF2 community, because I am a lesbien

I think its stupid how everyone trys to make gay/lesbien marriage illegal just because thats what a few old ladys in washington think

I mean, I was thinking of getting married, but its not legal, its only a "joined Union", I mean, I have a g/f but we cant get married like heterosexuals can, and they might make it completely legal

Because I want to be able to legally get married and adopt a child and stuff one day!

Post your opinion here

There are lots of things you can't do, Like have your girlfriends child (ie procreate with her) which would be a defining thing in a Marriage which involves 1 man/1 woman.  Why must you attack marriage.  Get a civil union, the same rights as married people, and be happy.  Marriage, which is between a man and a wowan, is a religious union and has always been that.  Why must you insist that you and your girlfriend be called "married". Your not, nor could you ever be. Nor could you marry a dog, a dog marry a cat, a redneck marry a sheep, and so on.....

I have no problem with you doing something that makes you happy and being who you are, but why insist on something that is insulting to many married people and their religious beliefs. 

What sets back the gay movement more than anything is the antics people do to get attention like dancing half nude in a parade, insisting on special laws, insisting that what is right for you be forced to be taught in schools to children at young ages, being purposely confrontational and disrespectful toward people that would largely not care.

Anyway, these are just my opinions and If you have any sweet pics of you and your g/f doing nasty things together, feel free to send me a few;)

2nd. I really don't like those who have a "defining characterisitic", and hang out in front of us, us who could otherwise care less. Then if something does happen, they pull that "card", be it race, preference, etc. so as to make themselves the victim. For instance, at my high school, there is an Ebony Society, yet an Ivory society, etc is forbidden. Why? We also have a GSA (Gay-Straight Alliance), yet no Straight Alliance, which could innocently be for the purpose of valueing straight beliefs. Why is that? Why are these "common" people constantly having to change and act differently around those who have a distinguishing trademark? Seems unfair to us, we shouldn't have to change to accomodate you, or at least not 100%. THere needs to be a mutual drive for a soution. One of the starkly different instances is Hispanic Immigration (i live in USA). These people do jobs that some snobby americans "can't" do. They are some of the hardest workers I've EVER known. On the other hand, a majority dont speak English, and wont for the first several months in the States. Basically, many of those live off the government. Now, at our (NC) schools, Spanish is key for us to communicate w/ them, whereas "English" classes for them to learn our language are few and far between. Don't get me wrong, "bilinguility" is a good thing, but to allow a native spanish speaker from mexico come in and take Spanish II?? Now that is wrong, stealing a slot for a more eligible candidate (an american who does NOT speak spanish), for someone who already speaks the language? It's under the pretense of "learning English" but for those of you in this situation, how much english is taught compared to Spanish??  classroom of 30 Americans and 3 immigrants. Is the teacher going to spend more time teaching SPanish to 30 or english to 3? The answer is most definitely Teach the 30.

I've gone on longer than i've planned...

Have A Nice Day B)

Last edited by R0lyP0ly (2006-04-12 09:56:00)

Skruples wrote:

Simply because your parents are not homosexual does not mean homosexuality is not genetic. There are two aspects of inheritance that are important, the genes that are passed down from your parents (genotype), and the way those genes manifest (phenotype). While it is true that noone has yet proved that homosexuality is based on genes, if it is it is most likely a recessive gene, meaning it would have to be passed down from both parents for the gene to be expressed.

For example, lets say your parents both carry the 'gay gene' or G. because there are two of these alleles in every person, each of your parents would have to be Gg, or one instance of recessive and one dominant allele. When your parents had you, both would have had to pass on the g gene, so you would be 'gg', and thus the gene would express itself.

Of course, that is a very simplistic explanation, as homosexuality (if indeed it is controlled genetically) is most likely caused by the interaction of many different genes, not just one.

Someone correct me if my interpretation of genetic inheritance is incorrect.

Science 101:

If the "homsexual" gene was G, and you were gg, you would infact NOT be homosexual. Barring that, your parents (F1 generation) may be heterozygous, as you stated, or they may be homozygous, in which they have the same allele (i.e. gg or GG), therefore, using this monohybrid cross (of GG and Gg), there is no chance of you being homosexual(you are F2 generation), but a 1/2 chance of you being heterozygous,, which could yield homosexual children should you marry a heterozygous or dominant recessive homozygous(assuming heterosex gene is 'g'). This dominant recessive gene could also be a perfect example of epistasis, as it will mask the expression of such alleles common in "stright" people.

^^^This is all assuming that being homosexual is a principle of genetics, which it is largely not!!

Last edited by R0lyP0ly (2006-04-12 10:13:08)

mofo65 wrote:

Brikiin118 wrote:

I just wanted to check with the BF2 community, because I am a lesbien

I think its stupid how everyone trys to make gay/lesbien marriage illegal just because thats what a few old ladys in washington think

I mean, I was thinking of getting married, but its not legal, its only a "joined Union", I mean, I have a g/f but we cant get married like heterosexuals can, and they might make it completely legal

Because I want to be able to legally get married and adopt a child and stuff one day!

Post your opinion here

Who really cares except the republicans on even numbered years.

last i checked this wasn't a political poll. Keep it straight (no pun intended).

R0lyP0ly wrote:

lowing wrote:

cpt.fass1 wrote:

Well with the poor, there are serveral issues to take into account. Not everyone growes up in the best enviroment, so there's alot to get into that is off topic and might be a good topic for an other thread. 

One thing on that though if you took Paris Hilton and took away her families money do you think she would be rich?

LOL.......very very true..............unless she went into porn I guess

Umm..if you took ANYBODY's family and all their money how COULD they be rich? Nothing would be seen for a long while as the "survivor" got onto his / her feet, a hard task considering you've just lost your entire family and all your life's savings.

the point he was making is this: she is only rich because she was born into money, she has no talent ( other than blow jobs I guess ) and would have never made any real living on her own, because she isn't goal oriented, and has no drive other than.

AHHHHHH, this is a Battlfield 2 Fourm not a chatroom for your gripes with society stick to shooting the bad guys, I have no problem with any one sexuality but if you wan't to talk about, it tie it into the game. 

Oppps, so sory, really, I'm the new guy in town I will stay off this post.

R0lyP0ly wrote:

Skruples wrote:

Simply because your parents are not homosexual does not mean homosexuality is not genetic. There are two aspects of inheritance that are important, the genes that are passed down from your parents (genotype), and the way those genes manifest (phenotype). While it is true that noone has yet proved that homosexuality is based on genes, if it is it is most likely a recessive gene, meaning it would have to be passed down from both parents for the gene to be expressed.

For example, lets say your parents both carry the 'gay gene' or G. because there are two of these alleles in every person, each of your parents would have to be Gg, or one instance of recessive and one dominant allele. When your parents had you, both would have had to pass on the g gene, so you would be 'gg', and thus the gene would express itself.

Of course, that is a very simplistic explanation, as homosexuality (if indeed it is controlled genetically) is most likely caused by the interaction of many different genes, not just one.

Someone correct me if my interpretation of genetic inheritance is incorrect.

Science 101:

If the "homsexual" gene was G, and you were gg, you would infact NOT be homosexual. Barring that, your parents (F1 generation) may be heterozygous, as you stated, or they may be homozygous, in which they have the same allele (i.e. gg or GG), therefore, using this monohybrid cross (of GG and Gg), there is no chance of you being homosexual(you are F2 generation), but a 1/2 chance of you being heterozygous,, which could yield homosexual children should you marry a heterozygous or dominant recessive homozygous(assuming heterosex gene is 'g'). This dominant recessive gene could also be a perfect example of epistasis, as it will mask the expression of such alleles common in "stright" people.

^^^This is all assuming that being homosexual is a principle of genetics, which it is largely not!!

Maybe there is a suck cock and a don't suck cock gene that accidently gets attached to the wrong gender of person.  Look at Micheal Jackson, how would the suck cock gene have known he was a man and not to attach itself to him????

Of course this is just my understanding of how genes work, I studied electronics.

Major_Spittle wrote:

R0lyP0ly wrote:

Skruples wrote:

Simply because your parents are not homosexual does not mean homosexuality is not genetic. There are two aspects of inheritance that are important, the genes that are passed down from your parents (genotype), and the way those genes manifest (phenotype). While it is true that noone has yet proved that homosexuality is based on genes, if it is it is most likely a recessive gene, meaning it would have to be passed down from both parents for the gene to be expressed.

For example, lets say your parents both carry the 'gay gene' or G. because there are two of these alleles in every person, each of your parents would have to be Gg, or one instance of recessive and one dominant allele. When your parents had you, both would have had to pass on the g gene, so you would be 'gg', and thus the gene would express itself.

Of course, that is a very simplistic explanation, as homosexuality (if indeed it is controlled genetically) is most likely caused by the interaction of many different genes, not just one.

Someone correct me if my interpretation of genetic inheritance is incorrect.

Science 101:

If the "homsexual" gene was G, and you were gg, you would infact NOT be homosexual. Barring that, your parents (F1 generation) may be heterozygous, as you stated, or they may be homozygous, in which they have the same allele (i.e. gg or GG), therefore, using this monohybrid cross (of GG and Gg), there is no chance of you being homosexual(you are F2 generation), but a 1/2 chance of you being heterozygous,, which could yield homosexual children should you marry a heterozygous or dominant recessive homozygous(assuming heterosex gene is 'g'). This dominant recessive gene could also be a perfect example of epistasis, as it will mask the expression of such alleles common in "stright" people.

^^^This is all assuming that being homosexual is a principle of genetics, which it is largely not!!

Maybe there is a suck cock and a don't suck cock gene that accidently gets attached to the wrong gender of person.  Look at Micheal Jackson, how would the suck cock gene have known he was a man and not to attach itself to him????

Of course this is just my understanding of how genes work, I studied electronics.

i love the maturity shown on these topics...thanks also to desertwraith. im glad the Bf2 population isn't a bunch of pre-pubescent nitwits, and can handle an mature topic using mature conversation (and words, i.e. the "cocksucker gene"). Please, if you can't handle this, don't act like you can by posting this kind of childish language...