lol yeah. Unfortunatly my friend didn't:King_County_Downy wrote:
Did you make it?
Yeah totally, I feel so stupid now...Magpie wrote:
BAM she owned you no doubt about that , You go giiiiiiiirl hahahahaLittleBitchy wrote:
Yes, sure, I'll be your little maid, running around doing stuff you want me to, can't wait. That's why i registered here.ghettoperson wrote:
LB, we need pix of you holding some kind of sign wishing the general population of the forum well in our endeavours.
So here are 2 more pics of me, one while i was still black&red (1month and a half ago) and one with my boyfriend done about 3weeks ago. He's also registered on the forum so if you have any more issuses with my gender, you can ask him if i have a dick between my legs.
Ktnx.
http://www.shrani.si/t/1o/RY/4WSjmQnh/2/08042009784.jpg
http://www.shrani.si/t/1F/3o/2qIgqqtI/mesweetie.jpg
menzo good job
Fall seven times. Stand up eight.
yai
Last edited by menzo2003 (2009-06-05 08:21:33)
Hai BF2s. Imma reading my bookz.
I'm molesting a classical sculpture.
Imma getting my mack on.
Last edited by Uzique (2009-06-10 18:04:35)
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
^ did you steal those shoes from an old folks home, or you really just don't know how to tie shoes (it's ok, I won't tell anyone)
Don't you be dissin' my Stan Smith special-design Adidas, yo!
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
This is why I say don't get caught up in camera quality at first in photography. This is a very interesting shot from a composition point of view. Not sure if that was the intent or not .Uzique wrote:
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Oh yes, the quality is terrible. Taken casually using the girlfriend's little digital Fujitsu (I think) snapper. Definitely nothing note-worthy. aha.
I guess it says a lot when that low-qual picture has already been enhanced and shined up by some Apple iPhoto wizardry. Haha. The composition-technique was complete luck and serendipity, I'm afraid to say. Here are some better examples of (properly conforming and stereotype-defining) 'amateur photography':
Hideously bad quality/technique/everything.
I guess it says a lot when that low-qual picture has already been enhanced and shined up by some Apple iPhoto wizardry. Haha. The composition-technique was complete luck and serendipity, I'm afraid to say. Here are some better examples of (properly conforming and stereotype-defining) 'amateur photography':
Hideously bad quality/technique/everything.
Last edited by Uzique (2009-06-10 20:54:22)
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digita … pix_z20fd/ it would appear .Uzique wrote:
Oh yes, the quality is terrible. Taken casually using the girlfriend's little digital Fujitsu (I think) snapper. Definitely nothing note-worthy. aha.
I guess it says a lot when that low-qual picture has already been enhanced and shined up by some Apple iPhoto wizardry. Haha. The composition-technique was complete luck and serendipity, I'm afraid to say. Here are some better examples of (properly conforming and stereotype-defining) 'amateur photography':
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3402/361 … bc6552.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3303/361 … 5c.jpg?v=0
Hideously bad quality/technique/everything.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Yep, exactly that! One of those typical girl's-handbag cameras... you know the sort.
I've already told her I'm buying her/us a decent D-SLR anyway. Hopefully she'll get a knack for it.
I've already told her I'm buying her/us a decent D-SLR anyway. Hopefully she'll get a knack for it.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Fuck me whats that in the background? Your Uni?Uzique wrote:
Oh yes, the quality is terrible. Taken casually using the girlfriend's little digital Fujitsu (I think) snapper. Definitely nothing note-worthy. aha.
I guess it says a lot when that low-qual picture has already been enhanced and shined up by some Apple iPhoto wizardry. Haha. The composition-technique was complete luck and serendipity, I'm afraid to say. Here are some better examples of (properly conforming and stereotype-defining) 'amateur photography':
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3402/361 … bc6552.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3303/361 … 5c.jpg?v=0
Hideously bad quality/technique/everything.
Yeah. There are more pictures without the annoying students in the foreground in the photography thread.1927 wrote:
Fuck me whats that in the background? Your Uni?Uzique wrote:
Oh yes, the quality is terrible. Taken casually using the girlfriend's little digital Fujitsu (I think) snapper. Definitely nothing note-worthy. aha.
I guess it says a lot when that low-qual picture has already been enhanced and shined up by some Apple iPhoto wizardry. Haha. The composition-technique was complete luck and serendipity, I'm afraid to say. Here are some better examples of (properly conforming and stereotype-defining) 'amateur photography':
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3402/361 … bc6552.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3303/361 … 5c.jpg?v=0
Hideously bad quality/technique/everything.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
That's a mental looking Uni man.Uzique wrote:
Yeah. There are more pictures without the annoying students in the foreground in the photography thread.1927 wrote:
Fuck me whats that in the background? Your Uni?Uzique wrote:
Oh yes, the quality is terrible. Taken casually using the girlfriend's little digital Fujitsu (I think) snapper. Definitely nothing note-worthy. aha.
I guess it says a lot when that low-qual picture has already been enhanced and shined up by some Apple iPhoto wizardry. Haha. The composition-technique was complete luck and serendipity, I'm afraid to say. Here are some better examples of (properly conforming and stereotype-defining) 'amateur photography':
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3402/361 … bc6552.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3303/361 … 5c.jpg?v=0
Hideously bad quality/technique/everything.
I was just kidding, it's my house really.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Summer is here, which means more of this:
Just got a hold of a bunch of pictures from a week-long class field trip in the mountains.
I am comparable to a tree (actually I just cut out a whole lot of the original to make it fit):
Just got a hold of a bunch of pictures from a week-long class field trip in the mountains.
I am comparable to a tree (actually I just cut out a whole lot of the original to make it fit):
Last edited by mtb0minime (2009-06-11 17:15:21)
Whee!
Spoiler (highlight to read):
Stop staring at my girlfriends tits, you pervs.
Spoiler (highlight to read):
Stop staring at my girlfriends tits, you pervs.
I need around tree fiddy.
Aye! Donnie! Check out them tittays on the girl behind you!DonFck wrote:
Whee!
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/129/48 … 830811.jpg
Spoiler (highlight to read):
Stop looking at my girlfriends tits, you pervs
Edit: Doh! your gf eh? lulz. oops
Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it
Too busy looking at delicious caek. Om nom nom nom.King_County_Downy wrote:
Aye! Donnie! Check out them tittays on the girl behind you!DonFck wrote:
Whee!
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/129/48 … 830811.jpg
Spoiler (highlight to read):
Stop looking at my girlfriends tits, you pervs
I need around tree fiddy.
Donnie is 12 years old haha.DonFck wrote:
Whee!
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/129/48 … 830811.jpg
Spoiler (highlight to read):
Stop staring at my girlfriends tits, you pervs.
and lol I didn't noticed the tits until I read the spoiler so thanks for the spoiler notice, my eyes are tired now.
is that your beer, next to the caek? excellent . . .DonFck wrote:
Too busy looking at delicious caek. Om nom nom nom.
I was about to say that, too! And I didn't even count the candles. He just has that look to him with that party hat..Sup wrote:
Donnie is 12 years old haha.