they never had to read it to begin with.Macbeth wrote:
They don't have to read you your miranda rights when they arrest you. SCOTUS just ruled on that a little while ago.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/2 … 91232.html
The dont have to read you your rights when they arrest you. its a misconception. I dont know where I heard that.
They do have to in AmericaAdams_BJ wrote:
The dont have to read you your rights when they arrest you. its a misconception. I dont know where I heard that.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
No they don't.
no they don't. Im talking about america.Jay wrote:
They do have to in AmericaAdams_BJ wrote:
The dont have to read you your rights when they arrest you. its a misconception. I dont know where I heard that.
I have no idea what it is here in AU
They have to read you your rights if they want to interrogate you and use that in court.
No, the Miranda exception covers cases of imminent threat - when homie takes a bullet in the throat and the leg, the US district atty has the discretion to allow local law enforcement leeway to allow the suspect to recover to disavow or affirm that others were acting in contravention to US interests (security) and on physicians advice determine when the neck bleeding motherfucker is of sound mind.Jay wrote:
They do have to in AmericaAdams_BJ wrote:
The dont have to read you your rights when they arrest you. its a misconception. I dont know where I heard that.
for a libertarian, you*re a lightweight . . .
We had no terrorist attacks under Bush. This is why we shouldn't have pulled out of Iraq. We would have been fighting them over there instead of over here.
Macbeth wrote:
We had no terrorist attacks under Bush. This is why we shouldn't have pulled out of Iraq. We would have been fighting them over there instead of over here.
Macbeth wrote:
We had no terrorist attacks under Bush. This is why we shouldn't have pulled out of Iraq. We would have been fighting them over there instead of over here.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 
l o l
DesertFox- wrote:
They have to read you your rights if they want to interrogate you and use that in court.
can't you read, or didn't they teach you that in the medrassa?13/f/taiwan wrote:
DesertFox- wrote:
They have to read you your rights if they want to interrogate you and use that in court.
Mutantbear wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
We had no terrorist attacks under Bush. This is why we shouldn't have pulled out of Iraq. We would have been fighting them over there instead of over here.
i went to the white man's school.
Yes, and the exception only lasts a short while. After that, rights have to be read or anything said is inadmissible as evidence in court.13urnzz wrote:
No, the Miranda exception covers cases of imminent threat - when homie takes a bullet in the throat and the leg, the US district atty has the discretion to allow local law enforcement leeway to allow the suspect to recover to disavow or affirm that others were acting in contravention to US interests (security) and on physicians advice determine when the neck bleeding motherfucker is of sound mind.Jay wrote:
They do have to in AmericaAdams_BJ wrote:
The dont have to read you your rights when they arrest you. its a misconception. I dont know where I heard that.
for a libertarian, you*re a lightweight . . .
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
in spite of that, what else did the nuns show you?13/f/taiwan wrote:
i went to the white man's school.
I wonder what made these two go crazy. They seemed to be fairly normal before bombing people.
For instance here is the older brother's boxing profile
http://imgur.com/a/Eigx3
For instance here is the older brother's boxing profile
http://imgur.com/a/Eigx3
Macbeth wrote:
I wonder what made these two go crazy. They seemed to be fairly normal before bombing people.
For instance here is the older brother's boxing profile
http://imgur.com/a/Eigx3
lol
All of this attention we are giving to the bombers is going to result in the next would be mass shooter setting off bombs in a crowded place.
thanks for that, markoo*estMacbeth wrote:
http://imgur.com/a/Eigx3
below karma is me also
SwagAussieReaper wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
I wonder what made these two go crazy. They seemed to be fairly normal before bombing people.
For instance here is the older brother's boxing profile
http://imgur.com/a/Eigx3
lol
don't believe everything the gov't tells you roc! that photo is a fabrication! wake up people!!!