I'm totally looking forward to seeing more cranes.
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 4 »
- Battlefield 4 - Main Thread
- globefish23
- sophisticated slacker
- +334|6324|Graz, Austria
I personally can't wait for chest-high walls, cargo containers and piles of gravel.globefish23 wrote:
I'm totally looking forward to seeing more cranes.
you play and like bf3. stop jumping on the bandwagon, now the majority are dissing it.Roc18 wrote:
needs more blueLittle BaBy JESUS wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl … 7wTavXRxKc
Probably a more accurate trailer
(reposted from cybergamer)
What bandwagon? BF4 is a copy and paste job of BF3.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
you play and like bf3. stop jumping on the bandwagon, now the majority are dissing it.Roc18 wrote:
needs more blueLittle BaBy JESUS wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl … 7wTavXRxKc
Probably a more accurate trailer
(reposted from cybergamer)
Last edited by Roc18 (2013-04-29 10:52:51)
you do realize that video was emphasizing all the worst parts of BF3, as well as predicting how bad BF4 will be, right? it's 'satirical' because it is basically grotesquely and exaggeratedly portraying BF4 as a clone of BF3... in the negative sense. so when you say "more blue light", you are actually dissing a game you professed to enjoy, because BF3 pretty much pioneered the whole 'stupid filter/tint/saturated graphics' thing. it's a part of the BF3 frostbite engine/graphics rendering method.Roc18 wrote:
What bandwagon? BF4 is a copy and paste job of BF3.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
you play and like bf3. stop jumping on the bandwagon, now the majority are dissing it.Roc18 wrote:
needs more blue
cannot believe this has to be explained to you, whilst elsewhere you talk about "being smart, honest".
You didn't have to explain anything, you're missing my point. BF3 wasn't a perfect game of course if someone disses an aspect of the game I don't like I'll agree. Overall its a good game. I don't like that they're basically copying and pasting BF3 and selling it for $60 again.
i mean yeah, bf3 never used any disagreeable or dubious sales means or business models...
At least they waited a good 7 years between releases before pulling that hype/DLC crap. Although I believe BF3 should've been called Bad Company 3.
the fact is you probably paid like a little bitch for your bf3 DLC/'premium' bullshit, but now you're acting all "oh no, this is too far, man" about a quick cash-in BF4 sequel. you have no consistent values. you contradict yourself and the views you supposedly espouse.
It is too far. They got away with it with BF3 and I don't like that they're doing it with BF4. How hard is that to understand?
they "got away with it"? that's just a euphemistic way of saying "they did it, but i was a little bitch and paid for it anyway". most people stopped playing bf3 before that lame shit came out - especially most people from this forum. they didn't "get away with it". just you have cognitive dissonance.
I enjoyed playing BF3, don't let that bother you so much.
it doesn't bother me. you are just a little confused in your views.
To be fair BF3 suffered from a lot of the "mediocre blockbuster" syndrome. It was fun to play for the first 30 minutes but the amount of bullshit and glaring unfixed issues means that a lot of people who liked it on the surface hated it for its mediocrity. I played it for a good 200 hours. It was definitely not a "bad" game. Just nothing compared to what the series used to be. Premium wasn't bad, either. Aside from Close Quarters.
I think the most anger we have over BF4 so far is that they are showing off the singleplayer instead of the multiplayer. In BF3 it was cool because it showed off the new engine. Now people just don't give a fuck. I haven't completely written it off yet, its entirely possible that the multiplayer will be fantastic, seeing as how the campaign and multiplayer are practically seperate games. I'm not holding my breath though.
I think the most anger we have over BF4 so far is that they are showing off the singleplayer instead of the multiplayer. In BF3 it was cool because it showed off the new engine. Now people just don't give a fuck. I haven't completely written it off yet, its entirely possible that the multiplayer will be fantastic, seeing as how the campaign and multiplayer are practically seperate games. I'm not holding my breath though.
CQ and that latest expansions sucked. B2K, AK and AM were good.
this CTF mode is shit.
this CTF mode is shit.
The battlefield series made a lot of improvements over the years in some areas. Other ones it went backwards.
BF3 is a good game. I would love if they did a BF2 remake or made BF4 4 player split screen capable for the next generation consoles with 32 players max. Either thing would make up for BF3 not filling the huge shoes of BF2.
Last edited by Roc18 (2013-04-29 16:40:59)
Who the hell plays splitscreen anymore? That would be lame.
I wish they'd drop consoles entirely and focus only on the pc. Unrealistic, I know, but it would make for a better game.
No reason they can't do both but just put in the money to make them distinct.
People with friends.Macbeth wrote:
Who the hell plays splitscreen anymore? That would be lame.
And people who want to be in the same room with the people they're playing with.
Remakes do well. Like CS:GO. That game is off the rails crazy popular. No one plays source anymore.
LAN?Roc18 wrote:
People with friends.Macbeth wrote:
Who the hell plays splitscreen anymore? That would be lame.
And people who want to be in the same room with the people they're playing with.
Sounds like some lame friends.Roc18 wrote:
People with friends.Macbeth wrote:
Who the hell plays splitscreen anymore? That would be lame.
And people who want to be in the same room with the people they're playing with.
I still enjoyed BF3 and played a lot of the game. I am just hoping that they don't make the same mistakes again, however unfortunately they undoubtedly will.
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 4 »
- Battlefield 4 - Main Thread