studies have to necessarily be limited. i'm not sure how you'd go about devising a meaningful methodology to unpick, once and for all, 'the cause of rape' in the course of a journal article. that's a vast criminological and sociological question that would take in about 13 different disciplines. maybe a book-length treatment could make a run at it.
the study is admittedly modest in its scope but i picked it as an example to show that external factors affect the rates of rape, not inherent genetic ones.
i'm sure that white girls being predated upon by well-hung big black men is a thing that occupies you a lot. racists do tend to obsess over inter-racial sex and the 'purity of our little girls'. take it up with your therapist.
you honestly talk about black people as if they are a subspecies of human with barely restrained ape impulses. your entire grasp of the concept of 'race' is illiterate and incoherent: you seriously think that racial phenotypes determine radically different types of human behaviour. they do not. changes in skin tone, hair/eye colour, facial shape and build, etc, are not paramount to 'more violent, especially likes rape'. we are the same species and have more-or-less the same cognitive hardware (i'm not going to get into the IQ score debate here for the umpteenth time).
in the genetic view, modern africans are a more recent appearance in the human family than european caucasians. they are a 'newer model' in your misguided evolutionary biology claptrap. in the historical view, europeans were bloodletting each other and continually re-halving the size of the continent's population all the way up until 1945. you simply can't make any credible claim that 'africans are especially violent, because they are atavistic and genetically inferior'.
again: proven externalities determine crime rates, whether they be cultural or acquired/learned behaviours, economic privations, social disadvantages, geographic proximity to existing crime or dysfunction, etc. black people aren't born with a penchant for rape. these claims are purely fucking outrageous. the fact you think that the legion of experts and researchers who post this stuff are 'slaves to ideology' just shows how far you are down the rabbithole of so-called 'scientific racism'. you're the racial equivalent of climate change deniers.
Last edited by uziq (2021-11-10 22:44:57)