unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|7026|PNW

cl4u53w1t2 wrote:

Pubic wrote:

Who would win, in a fist fight between Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein?
saddam, hands down
Hitler was an Iron Cross holder. Who knows.
CC-Marley
Member
+407|7083
Saddam was a bad ass thug in the day
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5514|foggy bottom

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

cl4u53w1t2 wrote:

Pubic wrote:

Who would win, in a fist fight between Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein?
saddam, hands down
Hitler was an Iron Cross holder. Who knows.
In the First World War, approximately four million Iron Crosses of the lower grade (2nd Class) were issued, as well as around 145,000 of the higher grade (1st Class).[4] Exact numbers of awards are not known, since the Prussian archives were destroyed during the Second World War. The multitude of awards reduced the status and reputation of the decoration. Among the holders of the 1914 Iron Cross 2nd Class and 1st Class was Adolf Hitler, who held the rank of Gefreiter. Hitler can be seen wearing the award on his left breast, as was standard, in many photographs.
Tu Stultus Es
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7030|Moscow, Russia

Jay wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Had Hitler captured Moscow or even Stalingrad it would have been a Pyrric victory.

You can't hold a city without securing any supplies before hand.
Correct. Napoleon took Moscow and his army starved.
/facepalm

back to school. both of you.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6752

Shahter wrote:

Jay wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Had Hitler captured Moscow or even Stalingrad it would have been a Pyrric victory.

You can't hold a city without securing any supplies before hand.
Correct. Napoleon took Moscow and his army starved.
/facepalm

back to school. both of you.
they didn't learn the first time, and now they're set in their ways . . .
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|7026|PNW

eleven bravo wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

cl4u53w1t2 wrote:


saddam, hands down
Hitler was an Iron Cross holder. Who knows.
In the First World War, approximately four million Iron Crosses of the lower grade (2nd Class) were issued, as well as around 145,000 of the higher grade (1st Class).[4] Exact numbers of awards are not known, since the Prussian archives were destroyed during the Second World War. The multitude of awards reduced the status and reputation of the decoration. Among the holders of the 1914 Iron Cross 2nd Class and 1st Class was Adolf Hitler, who held the rank of Gefreiter. Hitler can be seen wearing the award on his left breast, as was standard, in many photographs.
Thank you, wikipedia. The Iron Cross 1st Class was also rarely awarded to lower ranks.
Adams_BJ
Russian warship, go fuck yourself
+2,054|6877|Little Bentcock
BVC
Member
+325|6950
If Iran launched a shock & awe style surprise attack, how much of the oil infrastructure in the region could the destroy before being stopped?
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6407|what

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

eleven bravo wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:


Hitler was an Iron Cross holder. Who knows.
In the First World War, approximately four million Iron Crosses of the lower grade (2nd Class) were issued, as well as around 145,000 of the higher grade (1st Class).[4] Exact numbers of awards are not known, since the Prussian archives were destroyed during the Second World War. The multitude of awards reduced the status and reputation of the decoration. Among the holders of the 1914 Iron Cross 2nd Class and 1st Class was Adolf Hitler, who held the rank of Gefreiter. Hitler can be seen wearing the award on his left breast, as was standard, in many photographs.
Thank you, wikipedia. The Iron Cross 1st Class was also rarely awarded to lower ranks.
He didn't win the Blue Max so Hitler was a loser.

Then again, neither did Saddam.



@shahter - you think had Stalingrad been taken Paulus would've advanced any further?

Of course not. The German army was well outstretched beyond it's means by that stage anyway.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7030|Moscow, Russia

AussieReaper wrote:

@shahter - you think had Stalingrad been taken Paulus would've advanced any further?
the point of that operation wasn't in taking stalingrad, and most certainly not in "advancing further".
back to school, i say.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6665|'Murka

Pubic wrote:

If Iran launched a shock & awe style surprise attack, how much of the oil infrastructure in the region could the destroy before being stopped?
Easy to answer: Iran couldn't launch a "shock & awe style attack." They don't have the air force capabilities to do it.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5613|London, England

Shahter wrote:

Jay wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Had Hitler captured Moscow or even Stalingrad it would have been a Pyrric victory.

You can't hold a city without securing any supplies before hand.
Correct. Napoleon took Moscow and his army starved.
/facepalm

back to school. both of you.
I was just pointing out that capturing a city does not mean you win. Moscow was captured, and burned, by Napoleon and Russia didn't collapse or surrender. It was actually his undoing as he ended up deep in a hostile nation without any food with winter setting in.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5840

Napoleon lost the majority of his troops on the way to Moscow in the fall. It was already burnt by the time he got there.
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|6254|Vortex Ring State

Mekstizzle wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

eleven bravo wrote:


i doubt it.  100000 is a lot of people.  minie balls werent spitballs and cannons were pretty powerful.  i bet a cannon ball could damge a tank pretty well and probably disable a bradley
Put the 100 Marines in AH1Zs, problem solved
Let me put my armchair computer general hat on

They'd run out of ammo and fuel pretty quickly and 100,000 is an insane amount of people, assuming the ancient Brits don't all run away/surrender at the sight of seeing hovering death machines and actually tough it out. Which, according to Jord, they would never even think of doing.
they'd run and hide until they ran out of fuel and crashed, then bayonet charge the remaining pilots
BVC
Member
+325|6950

FEOS wrote:

Easy to answer: Iran couldn't launch a "shock & awe style attack." They don't have the air force capabilities to do it.
Perhaps I could have phrased that better.

"If Iran threw everything they had at oil infrastructure in the region, aall at once, how much of said oil infrastructure could they destroy before being stopped?  Just how badly could they cripple the flow of oil from the middle east?"

I'm thinking planes & missiles hitting refineries, subs/boats hitting ports which handle oil/fuel, dudes with RPGs shooting at pipelines, that sort of thing, but with a strategy/goal behind it.

Last edited by Pubic (2012-01-25 17:27:55)

eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5514|foggy bottom
shock and awe against an iraqi military crippled by 10 years worth of sanctions.  tanks were towed to the battlefield.
Tu Stultus Es
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6360|eXtreme to the maX

Pubic wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Easy to answer: Iran couldn't launch a "shock & awe style attack." They don't have the air force capabilities to do it.
Perhaps I could have phrased that better.

"If Iran threw everything they had at oil infrastructure in the region, aall at once, how much of said oil infrastructure could they destroy before being stopped?  Just how badly could they cripple the flow of oil from the middle east?"

I'm thinking planes & missiles hitting refineries, subs/boats hitting ports which handle oil/fuel, dudes with RPGs shooting at pipelines, that sort of thing, but with a strategy/goal behind it.
Iran managed to fuck up the US occupation of Iraq pretty effectively.
Fuck Israel
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|6254|Vortex Ring State

Dilbert_X wrote:

Pubic wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Easy to answer: Iran couldn't launch a "shock & awe style attack." They don't have the air force capabilities to do it.
Perhaps I could have phrased that better.

"If Iran threw everything they had at oil infrastructure in the region, aall at once, how much of said oil infrastructure could they destroy before being stopped?  Just how badly could they cripple the flow of oil from the middle east?"

I'm thinking planes & missiles hitting refineries, subs/boats hitting ports which handle oil/fuel, dudes with RPGs shooting at pipelines, that sort of thing, but with a strategy/goal behind it.
Iran managed to fuck up the US occupation of Iraq pretty effectively.
yeah they probably could fuck over transport, not with overt attacks though.
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5514|foggy bottom
sure they can
Tu Stultus Es
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6665|'Murka

Dilbert_X wrote:

Pubic wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Easy to answer: Iran couldn't launch a "shock & awe style attack." They don't have the air force capabilities to do it.
Perhaps I could have phrased that better.

"If Iran threw everything they had at oil infrastructure in the region, aall at once, how much of said oil infrastructure could they destroy before being stopped?  Just how badly could they cripple the flow of oil from the middle east?"

I'm thinking planes & missiles hitting refineries, subs/boats hitting ports which handle oil/fuel, dudes with RPGs shooting at pipelines, that sort of thing, but with a strategy/goal behind it.
Iran managed to fuck up the US occupation of Iraq pretty effectively.
Not really. Minor irritant for a year or two.

Good to know it was just the US there, too. We'll have to tell all the Coalition troops who were killed and wounded that it didn't really happen.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5514|foggy bottom
no sir you are wrong.  iran was a major force behind a signficant number of the insurgency
Tu Stultus Es
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5514|foggy bottom
inb4 a million links from feos that doesnt come close to actually hearing farsi being spoken on the streets of sadr city.
Tu Stultus Es
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6665|'Murka

Pubic wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Easy to answer: Iran couldn't launch a "shock & awe style attack." They don't have the air force capabilities to do it.
Perhaps I could have phrased that better.

"If Iran threw everything they had at oil infrastructure in the region, aall at once, how much of said oil infrastructure could they destroy before being stopped?  Just how badly could they cripple the flow of oil from the middle east?"

I'm thinking planes & missiles hitting refineries, subs/boats hitting ports which handle oil/fuel, dudes with RPGs shooting at pipelines, that sort of thing, but with a strategy/goal behind it.
Planes? They can fly them in formation for parades, then they're down for maintenance for weeks at a time. I doubt they're able to do much from a combat perspective.

Missiles? They would be lucky to hit a target the size of a refinery. Their missiles are not very accurate. But I guess if you have a nuke or chem/bio warhead, that's close enough.

Subs and boats? Mostly boats. They could wreak havoc in the Straits of Hormuz.

Dudes with RPGs? They tried that. In Iraq. Didn't work out too well.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6665|'Murka

eleven bravo wrote:

no sir you are wrong.  iran was a major force behind a signficant number of the insurgency
And I didn't say anything different. Read more carefully and leave your snide bullshit nonsense comments at the fucking door.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5514|foggy bottom
lol snide.  someone seems hurt. 
let me sound like you for a second

"its like the pot calling the kettle black"

tell me, how much time have you spent outside the wire inside iraq?
Tu Stultus Es

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard