Eisenhower says you're wrong.
Fuck Israel
Defense spending as a percentage of GDP is far below Eisenhower's era.Dilbert_X wrote:
Eisenhower says you're wrong.
Last edited by RAIMIUS (2011-11-15 18:28:57)
Maybe they should get a job instead and become rich? Odd idea I know.Roc18 wrote:
>Camp out "protesting" for 2 months
>Get Nothing done
You're saying revolting against a despotic govt which puts the interests of rich and foreign masters before the common indigenous citizen never achieved anything?FEOS wrote:
There are things about the movement I agree with. There are things I disagree with. Same with the Tea Party.
But the objective engineer in me looks at the two and sees only one that has actually accomplished anything.
That tells me that "occupying" spaces isn't the route to successful change.
Pretty sure that's not what I said at all.Dilbert_X wrote:
You're saying revolting against a despotic govt which puts the interests of rich and foreign masters before the common indigenous citizen never achieved anything?FEOS wrote:
There are things about the movement I agree with. There are things I disagree with. Same with the Tea Party.
But the objective engineer in me looks at the two and sees only one that has actually accomplished anything.
That tells me that "occupying" spaces isn't the route to successful change.
OK.
Both the tea and the crates was ISO 14001 approvedDilbert_X wrote:
But throwing crates of tea into a river did?
If the government is despotic, why do these protestors want to expand the power of said government?Dilbert_X wrote:
You're saying revolting against a despotic govt which puts the interests of rich and foreign masters before the common indigenous citizen never achieved anything?FEOS wrote:
There are things about the movement I agree with. There are things I disagree with. Same with the Tea Party.
But the objective engineer in me looks at the two and sees only one that has actually accomplished anything.
That tells me that "occupying" spaces isn't the route to successful change.
OK.
Corporate power out of government! More intervention by government!Jay wrote:
If the government is despotic, why do these protestors want to expand the power of said government?Dilbert_X wrote:
You're saying revolting against a despotic govt which puts the interests of rich and foreign masters before the common indigenous citizen never achieved anything?FEOS wrote:
There are things about the movement I agree with. There are things I disagree with. Same with the Tea Party.
But the objective engineer in me looks at the two and sees only one that has actually accomplished anything.
That tells me that "occupying" spaces isn't the route to successful change.
OK.
Yes, it is.Dilbert_X wrote:
Curtailing the power of banks is hardly expanding govt.
Not necessarily, but all the OWS ideas for doing so did wind up calling for more government control/power.Jay wrote:
Yes, it is.Dilbert_X wrote:
Curtailing the power of banks is hardly expanding govt.
The day a wall street banker camps on my lawn and shits on my porch will be the day I find that image at all funny. They're hurting their cause (whatever the hell that is) by acting the way they are. "The whole world is watching," but people still have to live around their shit.
It's been two months.Anniversary - An anniversary is a day that commemorates and/or celebrates a past event that occurred on the same day of the year as the initial event. For example, the first event is the initial occurrence or, if planned, the inaugural of the event. One year later would be the first anniversary of that event.