ebug9 wrote:
Dauntless wrote:
it'll probably be a 3 way and i'll probably come last but it's the taking part that counts! xoxo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78bee/78beeb000139f0d5d6c3caf1415cd42d5fac00dc" alt="https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png"
ebug9 wrote:
Dauntless wrote:
it'll probably be a 3 way and i'll probably come last but it's the taking part that counts! xoxo
Well clearly Macbeth had anticipated a 1v1v1 grand final.tuckergustav wrote:
round 4 closed
ebug
dauntless
fatherted
whoever has taken this over...do your thing.
capt. fass1 wanted in . . .AussieReaper wrote:
Well clearly Macbeth had anticipated a 1v1v1 grand final.tuckergustav wrote:
round 4 closed
ebug
dauntless
fatherted
whoever has taken this over...do your thing.
He just never mentioned what he would do to solve it.
Dauntless is the meat in that sandwich.tuckergustav wrote:
A three way poll?
Surely, these boys wouldn't say no to a three way.
tuckergustav wrote:
A three way poll?
Surely, these boys wouldn't say no to a three way.
Dauntless wrote:
it'll probably be a 3 way and i'll probably come last but it's the taking part that counts! xoxo
A runoff between the top two was what I had planned but it looks like ig is guiding the ship now.RTHKI wrote:
thought he said 3 way semi final then top 2 final but iduno
Macbeth wrote:
Nah it's cool. I guess do it like an election- if the 'winner' gets less than 50% of the votes have a runoff between the top two. Otherwise 50% or more -> winner.
But I'll leave it to you to decide.
i g got it right - and honestly, <3 the finalists. it's not life and death, it's just a moderatorship to the winner.Macbeth wrote:
Nah it's cool. I guess do it like an election- if the 'winner' gets less than 50% of the votes have a runoff between the top two. Otherwise 50% or more -> winner.
But I'll leave it to you to decide.
called it.13/f/taiwan wrote:
Dauntless is going to take it.