ummmmm, why are you quoting me here?Dilbert_X wrote:
Its irrelevant to the question of whether Palin is Presidential material, and a lot of other things too.lowing wrote:
You get called out point blank and your retort is simply now "it doesn't matter"? It does matter as it relates to my point. How long ago is irrelevant. I stated that political platforms change. Period. That is a fact that can be demonstrated conclusively.
Ahh so the hatred toward the US in the ME and the results of that hatred was only 9 months old when 911 happened. Got it moving on.Dilbert_X wrote:
You're equating a steady economic collapse with a unique single event?lowing wrote:
another double standard. according you 911 was Bushes fault 9 months after he was elected, and here 2 years in, nothing is Obamas fault yet?
Bush was warned about Bin Laden, by Clinton and numerous others.
The financial mess was fully in place when Obama took over - how could that be his fault?
Well done for missing the point.War Man wrote:
I go by policy, views, and strength, not appearance or eloquence. I'd vote for a very fucking ugly fat person if I agreed with him or her.Dilbert_X wrote:
If someone appears ignorant and stupid then I'd say it does.War Man wrote:
Appearance does not matter.
Nah... She'd be a D..lowing wrote:
I already said in the beginning of all of this that the only reason Palin gets so much attention is she is good looking with big tits. If she were fat and ugly she would have disappeared a long time ago and i dare say probably never would have appeared in the first place.
And that isn't even including Rosie O'donne, whoopie goldberg etc...
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
It has changed over the years. But I'm tired of handing out history lessons.Dilbert_X wrote:
Whatever, its still a two party system, that hasn't changed.Kmar wrote:
Work on your quoting buddy.Dilbert_X wrote:
Its irrelevant to the question of whether Palin is Presidential material, and a lot of other things too.
It's relevant to the point of our two party system, which you brought up.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I don't care for the point, there is a difference. Didn't bother mentioning that I feel sorry for dilbert for giving a fuck for appearance.Jaekus wrote:
Well done for missing the point.War Man wrote:
I go by policy, views, and strength, not appearance or eloquence. I'd vote for a very fucking ugly fat person if I agreed with him or her.Dilbert_X wrote:
If someone appears ignorant and stupid then I'd say it does.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
yeah I guess you did fail the english in school. now address the context of the post.Jaekus wrote:
Did fail English in school? I said he appears intelligent. Palin does not.lowing wrote:
I already said in the beginning of all of this that the only reason Palin gets so much attention is she is good looking with big tits. If she were fat and ugly she would have disappeared a long time ago and i dare say probably never would have appeared in the first place.Jaekus wrote:
It is because she has shown time and time again she is unable to respond in a way that makes her look much better than a contestant at a beauty pagent. Obama at least appears articulte and intelligent, thus the due to the differences in their character it's not hard to see why one is considered to have had a gaffe, and the other would be considered unknowledgeable. You know, this little thing called precedence.
You give way too much credit for a guy that can not think or speak on his own without a rehearsal or staged questions or a teleprompter. Plenty of examples of this. Obama has appeared quite unintelligent "time and time again". and by you denying it, forgiving it, dismissing it etc is just another example of your hypocrisy. and since nothing he has done as president proves his superior intellect, how exactly can you draw the conclusion he is intelligent, unless of course you are considering his cunning and manipulation skills. If you are, then you gotta give props to Palin as well, right?
sorry, that is a matter of personal taste in their appearance. I think Palin is a hot MILF, and I do not stand alone in that opinion. Her accent is grating however.13rin wrote:
Nah... She'd be a D..lowing wrote:
I already said in the beginning of all of this that the only reason Palin gets so much attention is she is good looking with big tits. If she were fat and ugly she would have disappeared a long time ago and i dare say probably never would have appeared in the first place.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xIOLgnnwbw
And that isn't even including Rosie O'donne, whoopie goldberg etc...
Where did I deny anything or give credit to anyone?lowing wrote:
yeah I guess you did fail the english in school. now address the context of the post.Jaekus wrote:
Did fail English in school? I said he appears intelligent. Palin does not.lowing wrote:
I already said in the beginning of all of this that the only reason Palin gets so much attention is she is good looking with big tits. If she were fat and ugly she would have disappeared a long time ago and i dare say probably never would have appeared in the first place.
You give way too much credit for a guy that can not think or speak on his own without a rehearsal or staged questions or a teleprompter. Plenty of examples of this. Obama has appeared quite unintelligent "time and time again". and by you denying it, forgiving it, dismissing it etc is just another example of your hypocrisy. and since nothing he has done as president proves his superior intellect, how exactly can you draw the conclusion he is intelligent, unless of course you are considering his cunning and manipulation skills. If you are, then you gotta give props to Palin as well, right?
Oh yeah, that's you arguing with yourself again. Kinda tired of your mental masturbation, and the word you were looking for there is "content"
A 'D' as in 'democrat'... Watch said video.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Don't use the term MILF please, show some respect to her. Her high pitched voice is her main downfall, definitely though. Needs to improve on speech, especially as a woman.lowing wrote:
sorry, that is a matter of personal taste in their appearance. I think Palin is a hot MILF, and I do not stand alone in that opinion. Her accent is grating however.13rin wrote:
Nah... She'd be a D..lowing wrote:
I already said in the beginning of all of this that the only reason Palin gets so much attention is she is good looking with big tits. If she were fat and ugly she would have disappeared a long time ago and i dare say probably never would have appeared in the first place.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xIOLgnnwbw
And that isn't even including Rosie O'donne, whoopie goldberg etc...
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
She is a bit of a milf, agree there v
Oh good, I always love the denial arguments. You have trashed Palin for not being intelligent and the reasons you list, Obama is guilty of as well. the zeal you use in trashing Palin, and ONLY Palin, and not all politicians is quite obvious and inconsistent. That is the point.Jaekus wrote:
Where did I deny anything or give credit to anyone?lowing wrote:
yeah I guess you did fail the english in school. now address the context of the post.Jaekus wrote:
Did fail English in school? I said he appears intelligent. Palin does not.
Oh yeah, that's you arguing with yourself again. Kinda tired of your mental masturbation, and the word you were looking for there is "content"
lol why would I show Palin any more less respect than I would show any other MILF?War Man wrote:
Don't use the term MILF please, show some respect to her. Her high pitched voice is her main downfall, definitely though. Needs to improve on speech, especially as a woman.lowing wrote:
sorry, that is a matter of personal taste in their appearance. I think Palin is a hot MILF, and I do not stand alone in that opinion. Her accent is grating however.13rin wrote:
Nah... She'd be a D..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xIOLgnnwbw
And that isn't even including Rosie O'donne, whoopie goldberg etc...
I agree with you in the fact that she is one hell of a MILF. I would plow her to oblivion.lowing wrote:
lol why would I show Palin any more less respect than I would show any other MILF?War Man wrote:
Don't use the term MILF please, show some respect to her. Her high pitched voice is her main downfall, definitely though. Needs to improve on speech, especially as a woman.lowing wrote:
sorry, that is a matter of personal taste in their appearance. I think Palin is a hot MILF, and I do not stand alone in that opinion. Her accent is grating however.
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
This topic is ABOUT Palin, in case you haven't noticed already. Why do I need to bring up anyone else? If it were a thread about politics in general, that would be different.lowing wrote:
Oh good, I always love the denial arguments. You have trashed Palin for not being intelligent and the reasons you list, Obama is guilty of as well. the zeal you use in trashing Palin, and ONLY Palin, and not all politicians is quite obvious and inconsistent. That is the point.Jaekus wrote:
Where did I deny anything or give credit to anyone?lowing wrote:
yeah I guess you did fail the english in school. now address the context of the post.
Oh yeah, that's you arguing with yourself again. Kinda tired of your mental masturbation, and the word you were looking for there is "content"
C-
Jaekus wrote:
C-
Don't you get 400 points for getting your name right? Lol.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
I thought it was 200
e: lol 5 years of english study???
e: lol 5 years of english study???
Last edited by Hurricane2k9 (2011-06-22 14:56:09)
Blacks. Don't mean to be racist, that's just the way some of them are.War Man wrote:
Why can't some blacks get over it? The past is the past, we should learn from our mistakes and move on.
It is about Palin. It is about the yard stick you use to size her up, which is fine. My point is, you use a different yardstick for others. Which makes your opinions inconsistent and hypocritical.Jaekus wrote:
This topic is ABOUT Palin, in case you haven't noticed already. Why do I need to bring up anyone else? If it were a thread about politics in general, that would be different.lowing wrote:
Oh good, I always love the denial arguments. You have trashed Palin for not being intelligent and the reasons you list, Obama is guilty of as well. the zeal you use in trashing Palin, and ONLY Palin, and not all politicians is quite obvious and inconsistent. That is the point.Jaekus wrote:
Where did I deny anything or give credit to anyone?
Oh yeah, that's you arguing with yourself again. Kinda tired of your mental masturbation, and the word you were looking for there is "content"
C-
How? I'm not even talking about anyone else. I've even had to correct you FOUR TIMES on this and yet you STILL say I'm comparing her differently to others. Fail reading is fail.
you can be the smart ass all you want,deny all you want, I can't help that. I am content with the fact that you know the point I was making in all of this, and others have seen it and even agreed with it.Jaekus wrote:
How? I'm not even talking about anyone else. I've even had to correct you FOUR TIMES on this and yet you STILL say I'm comparing her differently to others. Fail reading is fail.
I'm not sure you really made a point that applied to anything I said tbh.
People agreeing with you is certainly a novelty, so I can understand why you felt the need to point it out.
People agreeing with you is certainly a novelty, so I can understand why you felt the need to point it out.
might be because my argument was addressed at the board and not specifically to you. If you did not see anything in my argument that applied to you, then maybe you should have just stayed out if it.Jaekus wrote:
I'm not sure you really made a point that applied to anything I said tbh.
People agreeing with you is certainly a novelty, so I can understand why you felt the need to point it out.
Last edited by lowing (2011-06-22 19:38:37)