If we broadly fund education then that will mean wealthier households would have to pay more taxes to fund the education of poor people who will better compete against their kids.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2023-07-20 10:18:27)
when you dont need to look at the price of a menu in a restaurantunnamednewbie13 wrote:
How rich is rich? I think people should be able to afford things like families, food, shelter, medicine, and recreation. And be able to have a nest egg, not a nest planetoid built on the exploitation of others and slumlording it up.
it's almost like the american revolution was timed quite closely with the somerset case in the UK and they saw the abolitionist wave over there. funny that.Dilbert_X wrote:
I don't think either of you understand why America became a republic.
If you think it was so the average person could improve their lives, and not so the rich could get richer and pay less tax I suggest you read a history book.
This is why most countries have progressive taxation, not reverse progressive like Americaunnamednewbie13 wrote:
How rich is rich? I think people should be able to afford things like families, food, shelter, medicine, and recreation. And be able to have a nest egg, not a nest planetoid built on the exploitation of others and slumlording it up.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2023-08-13 05:05:17)
Fires, or floods, maybe both.SuperJail Warden wrote:
So are we just going to have to get used to forest fires taking out entire cities in America?
wait till they find out about the insurance premium increases!Dilbert_X wrote:
Fires, or floods, maybe both.SuperJail Warden wrote:
So are we just going to have to get used to forest fires taking out entire cities in America?
Literally no-one predicted global warming was going to have an impact on the average person.
Why did the scientists not warn us?