real bad luck that shifty wants a small government yet wants to have a big military. LOL IRONY.Dilbert_X wrote:
Its bad luck neither side represents your views then eh?-Sh1fty- wrote:
I'm against high taxes, welfarism, government regulation of the economy (although there has to be a little bit of it), gun laws, abortion, laws against alcohol and drugs to an extent I won't explain now, etc.
Bolded part = lol, what & how would that in any way be a bad thing?-Sh1fty- wrote:
He's an anti-colonialist and is working hard at equalizing the playing field instead of making America the top dog on the block.AussieReaper wrote:
^that's where Obama sits and the GOP still call him socialist.
Just readShocking wrote:
Bolded part = lol, what & how would that in any way be a bad thing?-Sh1fty- wrote:
He's an anti-colonialist and is working hard at equalizing the playing field instead of making America the top dog on the block.AussieReaper wrote:
^that's where Obama sits and the GOP still call him socialist.
the second bit is just republican bullshit rhetoric. You buy in this crap too much shifty, then again I wouldn't have expected otherwise.
most. retarded. debate. ever. presidents don't have the power to make those decisions, and retards haven't heard of roe vs. wade? shiiiiiiiiiet.AussieReaper wrote:
The GOP can't even decide a stance on abortion.
The platform states personhood begins at conception and that abortion in all cases should be banned, yet Romney has said he would allow abortions in cases of rape, incest or when the mother's life is threatened. How can your Presidential candidate be against your main platform?
I know what neocolonialism is but considering we're talking to shifty I figured he was talking about actual old-school colonialism.Macbeth wrote:
Just readShocking wrote:
Bolded part = lol, what & how would that in any way be a bad thing?-Sh1fty- wrote:
He's an anti-colonialist and is working hard at equalizing the playing field instead of making America the top dog on the block.
the second bit is just republican bullshit rhetoric. You buy in this crap too much shifty, then again I wouldn't have expected otherwise.
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/20 … lonialism/
You're an idiot.-Sh1fty- wrote:
America is totally colonialist in a sense. Taking a huge chunk of this land from the Indians, same with Hawaii, and Guam and other pacific island. we sort of had panama and we still have puerto rico.
Obama is taking money away from the U.S. and giving it to foreign countries. He can sincerely fuck. off. We're using everybody else's expensive oil and not producing our own. That's just one of the ways he does that crap.
And yes we can have smaller government and maintain our military size and lower spending.
???Shocking wrote:
I know what neocolonialism is but considering we're talking to shifty I figured he was talking about actual old-school colonialism.Macbeth wrote:
Just readShocking wrote:
Bolded part = lol, what & how would that in any way be a bad thing?
the second bit is just republican bullshit rhetoric. You buy in this crap too much shifty, then again I wouldn't have expected otherwise.
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/20 … lonialism/
I skimmed over the first few paragraphs and saw the word neocolonialism, figured it'd have to be about that. My bad. Though if that's the point I agree.Macbeth wrote:
???Shocking wrote:
I know what neocolonialism is but considering we're talking to shifty I figured he was talking about actual old-school colonialism.
Did you actually read it? It wasn't discussing colonialism. It suggested that calling Obama a anti-colonialist is a dressed up way of saying 'he isn't one of us', 'Not American', 'a spear thrower', etc.
Yes.Macbeth wrote:
Were people in the 80's still singing the praises of Eisenhower?
A Wisconsinite13urnzz wrote:
i thought usmarine would like this
Last edited by War Man (2012-08-30 22:14:02)
lol. maybe you should be a proud patriot and use american made computers. oh wait its made by all those evil chinese!-Sh1fty- wrote:
America is totally colonialist in a sense. Taking a huge chunk of this land from the Indians, same with Hawaii, and Guam and other pacific island. we sort of had panama and we still have puerto rico.
Obama is taking money away from the U.S. and giving it to foreign countries. He can sincerely fuck. off. We're using everybody else's expensive oil and not producing our own. That's just one of the ways he does that crap.
And yes we can have smaller government and maintain our military size and lower spending.
10 ESTSpark wrote:
What time did Romney's speech start over there? My tz knowledge is shaky off-hand, but it seemed a bit late for me.
