To retarded rednecks shooting up and photographing civilians for lulz - this isn't normally part of war, which ended in Afghanistan some time ago - if it even ever was one.11 Bravo wrote:
to what? war?
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-04-25 04:25:40)
theyve been charged innitDilbert_X wrote:
Do you think troops killing civilians for lulz is going to help the war on terror?
Which is a bit late, what other actions are we taking?Cybargs wrote:
theyve been charged innitDilbert_X wrote:
Do you think troops killing civilians for lulz is going to help the war on terror?
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-04-25 05:56:29)
and you think planes wouldnt crash, people wouldnt go hungry, bridges wouldnt collapse....oh what a wonderful world dilbert lives inDilbert_X wrote:
Which is a bit late, what other actions are we taking?Cybargs wrote:
theyve been charged innitDilbert_X wrote:
Do you think troops killing civilians for lulz is going to help the war on terror?
After Abu Ghraib should we be ahead of the ball now?
Yes they would, unless you invent some sort of Time Cop device and sell it to the military.Dilbert_X wrote:
All I'm saying is if standards were higher, and/or management were tighter, things like the OP wouldn't happen.
With a disciplined military of quality recruits and proactive officers I reckon this wouldn't happen.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Yes they would, unless you invent some sort of Time Cop device and sell it to the military.Dilbert_X wrote:
All I'm saying is if standards were higher, and/or management were tighter, things like the OP wouldn't happen.
Compare the current DoD to the USSR's 1945 actions, and you will see that that is already the case.Dilbert_X wrote:
With a disciplined military of quality recruits and proactive officers I reckon this wouldn't happen.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Yes they would, unless you invent some sort of Time Cop device and sell it to the military.Dilbert_X wrote:
All I'm saying is if standards were higher, and/or management were tighter, things like the OP wouldn't happen.
Yes it would.Dilbert_X wrote:
With a disciplined military of quality recruits and proactive officers I reckon this wouldn't happen.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Yes they would, unless you invent some sort of Time Cop device and sell it to the military.Dilbert_X wrote:
All I'm saying is if standards were higher, and/or management were tighter, things like the OP wouldn't happen.
lolololololololololololololololololololololololDilbert_X wrote:
With a disciplined military of quality recruits and proactive officers I reckon this wouldn't happen.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Yes they would, unless you invent some sort of Time Cop device and sell it to the military.Dilbert_X wrote:
All I'm saying is if standards were higher, and/or management were tighter, things like the OP wouldn't happen.
you fucking what11 Bravo wrote:
lolololololololololololololololololololololololDilbert_X wrote:
With a disciplined military of quality recruits and proactive officers I reckon this wouldn't happen.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Yes they would, unless you invent some sort of Time Cop device and sell it to the military.
brits killed american civis and they were "gentlemen"
lololololollololol
