Camm
Feeding the Cats.
+761|5242|Dundee, Scotland.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/04/15/t … g-attempt/

Brilliant. Furthermore, not only have they completely failed in their guesswork, they've moved the exact same thinking on 10 years.

Last edited by Camm (2011-04-16 04:32:00)

for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6949|Canberra, AUS
Pretty lol.

Comments on that site are deadset awful though.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6235|Places 'n such
Just for the record this was a really rough guess made by a guy who has said that it really needs to be looked into properly, way back in 1995.
Whoever wrote the article doesn't seem to have read up on what they're attacking much.

Also read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Myers#Criticism
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5632|London, England

presidentsheep wrote:

Just for the record this was a really rough guess made by a guy who has said that it really needs to be looked into properly, way back in 1995.
Whoever wrote the article doesn't seem to have read up on what they're attacking much.

Also read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Myers#Criticism
And you felt the need to necro a thread that was stillborn... why?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6235|Places 'n such
Wouldn't want anyone running around d+st with ill informed opinions on stuff they don't understand yet still insisting they're right in the face of all evidence now would we?
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5632|London, England

presidentsheep wrote:

Wouldn't want anyone running around d+st with ill informed opinions on stuff they don't understand yet still insisting they're right in the face of all evidence now would we?
So instead you're gonna go out of your way to defend a guy that made wild miscalculations based on no data? Why? Does it hurt your vagina to have the UN rightfully scorned?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard