Last edited by AussieReaper (2011-03-12 04:13:47)
Personally I have made that mistake ( abortion). I have lived to regret it. But no, I am not pro- life. I am pro choice.AussieReaper wrote:
I'll bet you're pro-life too.
Last edited by lowing (2011-03-12 04:20:46)
they live, and we pay for them to liveSpark wrote:
what's so soft about life w/o parole?
how much can a bullet cost, compared to paying for a life time of meals, lawsuits, guards etc. C'mon Spark.Spark wrote:
well, you pay for them to die too.
frankly once they're out of society permanently i don't really care either way.
Last edited by lowing (2011-03-12 04:24:47)
You know it costs more to kill someone, yeah?lowing wrote:
how much can a bullet cost, compared to paying for a life time of meals, lawsuits, guards etc. C'mon Spark.Spark wrote:
well, you pay for them to die too.
frankly once they're out of society permanently i don't really care either way.
and frankly, if you don't care, lets put them down like the dirty dogs they are.
no idea, but every study i've seen says that on average it costs more to kill someone than to lock them away from life. bureaucratic inefficiency at its finest perhaps but there you have it.lowing wrote:
how much can a bullet cost, compared to paying for a life time of meals, lawsuits, guards etc. C'mon Spark.Spark wrote:
well, you pay for them to die too.
frankly once they're out of society permanently i don't really care either way.
well, if it makes you feel better.and frankly, if you don't care, lets put them down like the dirty dogs they are.
What is this, a lowing posts random news articles and gives his opinion thread?lowing wrote:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2014430157_apuscrashteenagerskilled.html?prmid=obinsite
lol well for these idiots it was just a matter of time anyway.
Looks like the gene pool in Pennsylvania just shallowed up a bit.
lol why is that? There are anti death penalty people that do not feel death penalty is right regardless of the crime. Human life is far too valuable and shit. I challenge that. How is that inflammatory?Nic wrote:
Meh, personally I think life in solitary confinement, in the dark would be worse, and fitting, but the death penalty would save money, if they would just do it, instead of waiting 20 years....
Nice inflammatory title anyway, god your a tool.
People were paying to much attention to the earthquake and other threads, and had stopped telling him how dumb he was in his Islam r bad thread. So he needed a new thread to argue in.AussieReaper wrote:
What is this, a lowing posts random news articles and gives his opinion thread?lowing wrote:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2014430157_apuscrashteenagerskilled.html?prmid=obinsite
lol well for these idiots it was just a matter of time anyway.
Looks like the gene pool in Pennsylvania just shallowed up a bit.
Thread title was misleading.
Neh saw that, posted just for funAussieReaper wrote:
What is this, a lowing posts random news articles and gives his opinion thread?lowing wrote:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2014430157_apuscrashteenagerskilled.html?prmid=obinsite
lol well for these idiots it was just a matter of time anyway.
Looks like the gene pool in Pennsylvania just shallowed up a bit.
Thread title was misleading.
What is there to debate in an earthquake thread? We all know it happened, we all are watching the news, what is the debate?Nic wrote:
People were paying to much attention to the earthquake and other threads, and had stopped telling him how dumb he was in his Islam r bad thread. So he needed a new thread to argue in.AussieReaper wrote:
What is this, a lowing posts random news articles and gives his opinion thread?lowing wrote:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2014430157_apuscrashteenagerskilled.html?prmid=obinsite
lol well for these idiots it was just a matter of time anyway.
Looks like the gene pool in Pennsylvania just shallowed up a bit.
Thread title was misleading.
Last edited by lowing (2011-03-12 05:28:31)
What, is that the first really fucked method of killing someone you ever read? I'm sure people who are against the death penalty have heard of bad shit like this before in their arguments. What did you bring to the table here that was worth starting a thread over. I mean at least put up some costs to taxpayers of keeping someone in prison for life, or repeat offense ratios. Something new at least.lowing wrote:
lol why is that? There are anti death penalty people that do not feel death penalty is right regardless of the crime. Human life is far too valuable and shit. I challenge that. How is that inflammatory?Nic wrote:
Meh, personally I think life in solitary confinement, in the dark would be worse, and fitting, but the death penalty would save money, if they would just do it, instead of waiting 20 years....
Nice inflammatory title anyway, god your a tool.
There's the problem, How much time do you give for contradictory evidence to show up, and how much does it cost to keep the person in jail for that long.Ultrafunkula wrote:
Ultrafunkula
http://hughbriss.com/wp-content/uploads … thumb1.jpg
Death penalty
In the case that the evidence is 100% foolproof and the right person gets the bullet / needle / AC/DC / rope. Wouldn't want to execute someone who's innocent now would we.
Good question. Evidence could be coming in several years later after the crime itself.Nic wrote:
There's the problem, How much time do you give for contradictory evidence to show up, and how much does it cost to keep the person in jail for that long.Ultrafunkula wrote:
Ultrafunkula
http://hughbriss.com/wp-content/uploads … thumb1.jpg
Death penalty
In the case that the evidence is 100% foolproof and the right person gets the bullet / needle / AC/DC / rope. Wouldn't want to execute someone who's innocent now would we.
Even murderers in prison do not abide by crimes harming children. That is something that has gone to the next several levels of criminal behavior.Nic wrote:
What, is that the first really fucked method of killing someone you ever read? I'm sure people who are against the death penalty have heard of bad shit like this before in their arguments. What did you bring to the table here that was worth starting a thread over. I mean at least put up some costs to taxpayers of keeping someone in prison for life, or repeat offense ratios. Something new at least.lowing wrote:
lol why is that? There are anti death penalty people that do not feel death penalty is right regardless of the crime. Human life is far too valuable and shit. I challenge that. How is that inflammatory?Nic wrote:
Meh, personally I think life in solitary confinement, in the dark would be worse, and fitting, but the death penalty would save money, if they would just do it, instead of waiting 20 years....
Nice inflammatory title anyway, god your a tool.
There being really fucked up people out there is nothing new. Anyway, enough attention for you.
There is such a thing as overwhelming evidence. this is what he is referring to.Or do you think someone broke into their home and beat their kid while they sat and watched a movie and ate pizza, so engrossed they didn't notice?Nic wrote:
There's the problem, How much time do you give for contradictory evidence to show up, and how much does it cost to keep the person in jail for that long.Ultrafunkula wrote:
Ultrafunkula
http://hughbriss.com/wp-content/uploads … thumb1.jpg
Death penalty
In the case that the evidence is 100% foolproof and the right person gets the bullet / needle / AC/DC / rope. Wouldn't want to execute someone who's innocent now would we.
Last edited by lowing (2011-03-12 04:45:43)
