Pages: 1 2 3 4

Topic closed

2011-03-04 16:17:15
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5369|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

The US has signed up to the UDHR for example, if the country hasn't got round to implementing it it simply demonstrates how slow and backwards it is
Nope. We never ratified it.
That was my point.
You have no point.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
2011-03-04 16:19:00
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5369|London, England
Close this thread please. He's not trying to do anything but troll. Again.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
2011-03-04 16:19:02
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,973|6642|949

Dilbert_X wrote:

I don't think any University anywhere else in the world would be able to enforce this, I've never heard of Universities requiring students to sign contracts either.
why wouldn't any university be able to enforce it?  I want to hear why you think it's a bad idea.
2011-03-04 16:19:27
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6116|eXtreme to the maX

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

I don't think any University anywhere else in the world would be able to enforce this, I've never heard of Universities requiring students to sign contracts either.
Umm, have you never seen Dazed and Confused? Have you never signed an agreement with your employer stating you won't do drugs? You're being obtuse.
We're talking about Universities and legal acts, not employers and illegal acts during work time.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
2011-03-04 16:20:29
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5369|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

I don't think any University anywhere else in the world would be able to enforce this, I've never heard of Universities requiring students to sign contracts either.
Umm, have you never seen Dazed and Confused? Have you never signed an agreement with your employer stating you won't do drugs? You're being obtuse.
We're talking about Universities and legal acts, not employers and illegal acts during work time.
There's zero difference. They're both private institutions.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
2011-03-04 16:20:33
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6116|eXtreme to the maX

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

I don't think any University anywhere else in the world would be able to enforce this, I've never heard of Universities requiring students to sign contracts either.
why wouldn't any university be able to enforce it?  I want to hear why you think it's a bad idea.
How is preventing people doing normal things which are part of their human rights a good thing?
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
2011-03-04 16:20:52
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5369|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

I don't think any University anywhere else in the world would be able to enforce this, I've never heard of Universities requiring students to sign contracts either.
why wouldn't any university be able to enforce it?  I want to hear why you think it's a bad idea.
How is preventing people doing normal things which are part of their human rights a good thing?
It's voluntary.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
2011-03-04 16:23:14
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6116|eXtreme to the maX

JohnG@lt wrote:

There's zero difference. They're both private institutions.
There is also the direction of service and direction of payment, and illegal vs illegal.

Would an employer be able to dictate that an employee could not associate with black people outside work hours?
I reckon someone would come down on that like a ton of bricks, in terms of constitutional and human rights.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-03-04 16:24:03)

Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
2011-03-04 16:23:21
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,973|6642|949

Dilbert_X wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

I don't think any University anywhere else in the world would be able to enforce this, I've never heard of Universities requiring students to sign contracts either.
why wouldn't any university be able to enforce it?  I want to hear why you think it's a bad idea.
How is preventing people doing normal things which are part of their human rights a good thing?
it's not preventing them from doing anything.  They can fuck like rabbits all they want.  They just won't be able to go to that PRIVATE school.

premarital sexual intercourse is a human right...you're fucking crazy dude.
2011-03-04 16:24:20
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5248|Cleveland, Ohio

JohnG@lt wrote:

Close this thread please. He's not trying to do anything but troll. Again.
2011-03-04 16:25:19
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6116|eXtreme to the maX
Freedom of association, expression and a right to a private life are human rights.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
2011-03-04 16:25:27
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5369|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

There's zero difference. They're both private institutions.
There is also the direction of service and direction of payment, and illegal vs illegal.

Would an employer be able to dictate that an employee could not associate with black people outside work hours?
I reckon someone would come down on that like a ton of bricks, in terms of constitutional and human rights.
If it's voluntary, as any work agreement is, there's no issue.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
2011-03-04 16:25:59
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5369|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

Freedom of association, expression and a right to a private life are human rights.
IT'S FUCKING VOLUNTARY.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
2011-03-04 16:26:08
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6116|eXtreme to the maX

11 Bravo wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Close this thread please. He's not trying to do anything but troll. Again.
Feel free to report, or pm a mod, otherwise -> http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=142177
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
2011-03-04 16:26:18
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6421|'Murka

It's a private school. They can do what they want.

We get it. It involves religion. You don't like religion. So you stir the pot. So not predictable at all.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
2011-03-04 16:28:11
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6116|eXtreme to the maX

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

There's zero difference. They're both private institutions.
There is also the direction of service and direction of payment, and illegal vs illegal.

Would an employer be able to dictate that an employee could not associate with black people outside work hours?
I reckon someone would come down on that like a ton of bricks, in terms of constitutional and human rights.
If it's voluntary, as any work agreement is, there's no issue.
Most of the world has employment law which would prohibit this kind of thing.
If the only company in town prohibited employees from associating with black people it would barely count as voluntary either.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-03-04 16:29:02)

Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
2011-03-04 16:28:18
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5248|Cleveland, Ohio

Dilbert_X wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Close this thread please. He's not trying to do anything but troll. Again.
Feel free to report, or pm a mod, otherwise -> http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=142177
what did i tell you about trying to be funny or clever
2011-03-04 16:29:53
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5369|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:


There is also the direction of service and direction of payment, and illegal vs illegal.

Would an employer be able to dictate that an employee could not associate with black people outside work hours?
I reckon someone would come down on that like a ton of bricks, in terms of constitutional and human rights.
If it's voluntary, as any work agreement is, there's no issue.
Most of the world has employment law which would prohibit this kind of thing.
If the only company in town prohibited employees from associating with black people it would barely count as voluntary either.
You can move.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
2011-03-04 16:30:09
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6421|'Murka

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:


There is also the direction of service and direction of payment, and illegal vs illegal.

Would an employer be able to dictate that an employee could not associate with black people outside work hours?
I reckon someone would come down on that like a ton of bricks, in terms of constitutional and human rights.
If it's voluntary, as any work agreement is, there's no issue.
Most of the world has employment law which would prohibit this kind of thing.
If the only company in town prohibited employees from associating with black people it would barely count as voluntary either.
And the NCAA has gobs of restrictions placed on athletes that make no sense, either, that wouldn't fly for a second in the business world. You're comparing apples and armchairs.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
2011-03-04 17:57:10
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5596

mormons...
2011-03-04 18:02:46
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6727

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

it's a private school, the kid willingly signed up and signed on.  Is this really a big deal in Australia?
No dilbert is just being a troll without doing his research. theres like only 3 private unis here.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
2011-03-04 18:04:24
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6508

Dilbert_X wrote:

Freedom of association, expression and a right to a private life are human rights.
hahahahahahaha, you'd never last @ byu. snitching is a way of life, and you'd violate the honor code just by walking on campus.

do you reaLize, byu will not let you take a test if you have facial hair?

honestly, every baby conceived in Provo Utah is born one month premature- a healthy, 8 lb. bundle of joy. the 'rights' you give up are more than offset to be able to go back to your redneck town and brag that you bagged a 'chaste and virtuous mormon girl from byu' when really your bride to be has killed more sperm than you did . . .
2011-03-04 18:11:09
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6727
dilbert its a private mormon university what do you expect. no one forced him to that school and its not like the only options.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
2011-03-04 20:07:33
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6782|PNW

RTHKI wrote:

BYU, Mormons, Utah. explains it really.
Incredibly petty [e: on their part; also, self facepalm for quoting when i meant to hit edit]. The Mormons are getting even more anal about stuff, but it doesn't, of course, reflect the views of the entire membership.
2011-03-04 20:10:01
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6421|'Murka

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

RTHKI wrote:

BYU, Mormons, Utah. explains it really.
Incredibly petty. The Mormons are getting even more anal about stuff, but it doesn't, of course, reflect the views of the entire membership.
I don't the the policy is that specific, tbh.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

Topic closed

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard