Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6628
Notice democrats are Quoting Reagan all of a sudden ?

I give obama a lot of license because in my way of thinking, The President if above the parties or could/should be. Also obama is scrambling now and trying to put together something to retain power and relevance.

Now I hear charles schummer ( who I will admit I detest ) Quoting Reagan in a Reverent way. I can not Remember a democrat ever having anything good to say about Reagan or his policies. What do you suppose this is about ? schummer quotes Reagan and suddenly we will forget who he is and what he stands for ? I realizes that is how he gets elected but conservatives did not vote for him. Does he expect his democrat liberal base to dismiss this as a mean to an end ? Does he think they will just forget it all if Paris Hilton poses nude or some other distraction takes center stage in the Networks ? How long till they start lauding G.W.Bush ?
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,054|7046|PNW

So, which talk show did you spoon this out of? It's been being bandied about a lot recently.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5860

Who gives a shit about who the democrats quote and who gives a fuck about Reagan?
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6628
I guess after so many years a 180 degree change in his out look is nothing to note,

schummer is my rep. BTW Good points all.

jesus

Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2011-01-25 11:56:41)

Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6812|Long Island, New York
So because they're Democrats they're never allowed to quote a Republican? Not to mention you didn't even post the quote.

Another brilliant post brought to you by H/J.
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6771

Democrats

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

How long till they start lauding G.W.Bush ?
girl, you have lost what's left of your mind.
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|6273|Vortex Ring State
I believe Reagan Democrats was a term used during the election

yeah it was

point?
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,981|6906|949

Why?  Because they are appealing to the already dumb mass voters who tend to vote on a whim and sound bytes instead of comprehensively understanding the whole platform and direction a certain party is going for.  It's an attempt to win over 'moderate' voters.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5632|London, England
https://www.recordpub.com/images/media/20091127/photos/112709TearDownThisMyth.jpg

Good book.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6628

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Why?  Because they are appealing to the already dumb mass voters who tend to vote on a whim and sound bytes instead of comprehensively understanding the whole platform and direction a certain party is going for.  It's an attempt to win over 'moderate' voters.
Do they think that will work. schummer usually leads the way holding the banner, He is to visible and to linked to the core party. wouldn't they do better to have some one who is not yet defined like say Gillibrand [sp]  take the lead on something like that. It just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. schummer is an icon. In NYC anyway.

Believe these tarts btw lol.
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5511|Cleveland, Ohio

Poseidon wrote:

So because they're Democrats they're never allowed to quote a Republican? Not to mention you didn't even post the quote.

Another brilliant post brought to you by H/J.
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6628

Trotskygrad wrote:

I believe Reagan Democrats was a term used during the election

yeah it was

point?
So you think there could be a  " schummer Conservative " Ground swell, that is your take on his strategy ?

PS How do you like our posters checking in above ?

Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2011-01-25 12:45:54)

Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6628

Poseidon wrote:

So because they're Democrats they're never allowed to quote a Republican? Not to mention you didn't even post the quote.

Another brilliant post brought to you by H/J.
You might not know this but htey HATE REAGAN worse than G.W.Bush. honestly I don't know why I try.
13rin
Member
+977|6753

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Why?  Because they are appealing to the already dumb mass voters who tend to vote on a whim and sound bytes instead of comprehensively understanding the whole platform and direction a certain party is going for.  It's an attempt to win over 'moderate' voters.
Worked for the Bamster the first time around.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
-CARNIFEX-[LOC]
Da Blooze
+111|6928
I believe they hate Reagan so much for how far up on a pedestal his vehement supporters have put him.  There are plenty of people who will, with a straight face, rank Reagan as one of the top 3 presidents.  Ever.

G. W. Bush, much less so...he's easy prey, and the Republicans distanced themselves from him somewhat.  It's not as fun to bash a guy who isn't entirely loved by his "team".

Last edited by -CARNIFEX-[LOC] (2011-01-25 12:49:28)

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/12516/Bitch%20Hunter%20Sig.jpg
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6628
So it is fun ? shh ! Only Republicans are divisive and partisan.
-CARNIFEX-[LOC]
Da Blooze
+111|6928
Newsflash: human beings are divisive, partisan, and tend to self-segregate.

Welcome to planet Earth.  Try to enjoy your time here.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/12516/Bitch%20Hunter%20Sig.jpg
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,981|6906|949

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Why?  Because they are appealing to the already dumb mass voters who tend to vote on a whim and sound bytes instead of comprehensively understanding the whole platform and direction a certain party is going for.  It's an attempt to win over 'moderate' voters.
Do they think that will work. schummer usually leads the way holding the banner, He is to visible and to linked to the core party. wouldn't they do better to have some one who is not yet defined like say Gillibrand [sp]  take the lead on something like that. It just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. schummer is an icon. In NYC anyway.

Believe these tarts btw lol.
They probably think it will work, or else why would they be doing it?  Politicians say whatever their campaign staffers tell them to say.  And they tell them to say things to sway popular opinion and/or win votes.  I think you're looking into this too deeply.
UnkleRukus
That Guy
+236|5310|Massachusetts, USA
Has any of you had any political experience at all?
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
13rin
Member
+977|6753
only 7 years.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
UnkleRukus
That Guy
+236|5310|Massachusetts, USA
Oh, and what exactly is it that you do.
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
13rin
Member
+977|6753
I've gotta be non-partisan so I'm not tellin'.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
UnkleRukus
That Guy
+236|5310|Massachusetts, USA
Which leads me to believe you have no experience, just like the rest of the forum.
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5860

I play the Total War series. I am an expert on foreign policy on marcoeconomic policy.
13rin
Member
+977|6753

UnkleRukus wrote:

Which leads me to believe you have no experience, just like the rest of the forum.
Don't care what you believe.  I've seen it closer than you and I guarentee closer than the average citizen.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard