Pages: 1 2
So sorry, I have returned!burnzz wrote:
how can we discuss it when you left? foreveralone.jpg
I love how the Queen is acting like "And not a single fuck was given that day."Macbeth wrote:
I guess some of Gil Vicente's art would be illegal then.
http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l998t … o1_500.jpg
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0bf … a/439x.jpg
http://www.eurthisnthat.com/wp-content/ … SKETCH.jpg
It doesn't look like a wheel chair. Looks like an ordinary chair. I have no idea who it is.AussieReaper wrote:
I love how the Queen is acting like "And not a single fuck was given that day."Macbeth wrote:
I guess some of Gil Vicente's art would be illegal then.
http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l998t … o1_500.jpg
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0bf … a/439x.jpg
http://www.eurthisnthat.com/wp-content/ … SKETCH.jpg
Who's that in the wheel chair?
Last edited by Macbeth (2011-01-10 20:46:13)
is that steve jobs?Macbeth wrote:
It doesn't look like a wheel chair. Looks like an ordinary chair. I have no idea who it is.AussieReaper wrote:
I love how the Queen is acting like "And not a single fuck was given that day."Macbeth wrote:
I guess some of Gil Vicente's art would be illegal then.
http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l998t … o1_500.jpg
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0bf … a/439x.jpg
http://www.eurthisnthat.com/wp-content/ … SKETCH.jpg
Who's that in the wheel chair?
http://artthreat.net/wp-content/uploads/agenda38.jpeg
The President of Iranian is pretty chill too.
http://www.hypebeast.com/image/2010/09/ … tion-4.jpg
Kofi Annan has better shit to do.
No it's an artist named Gil Vicente. He drew pictures of himself killing famous world leaders. It was an exhibit down in Brazil a little while back.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
is that steve jobs?Macbeth wrote:
It doesn't look like a wheel chair. Looks like an ordinary chair. I have no idea who it is.AussieReaper wrote:
I love how the Queen is acting like "And not a single fuck was given that day."
Who's that in the wheel chair?
http://artthreat.net/wp-content/uploads/agenda38.jpeg
The President of Iranian is pretty chill too.
http://www.hypebeast.com/image/2010/09/ … tion-4.jpg
Kofi Annan has better shit to do.
Vicente definitely has that serial killer look. That is one creepy motherfucker.Macbeth wrote:
No it's an artist named Gil Vicente. He drew pictures of himself killing famous world leaders. It was an exhibit down in Brazil a little while back.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
is that steve jobs?Macbeth wrote:
It doesn't look like a wheel chair. Looks like an ordinary chair. I have no idea who it is.
http://artthreat.net/wp-content/uploads/agenda38.jpeg
The President of Iranian is pretty chill too.
http://www.hypebeast.com/image/2010/09/ … tion-4.jpg
Kofi Annan has better shit to do.
Pretty much....Stingray24 wrote:
Couple this with the desire of Democrat U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn wanting to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine and you have a solid hit on the first amendment.
ok so let me get this straight. This liberal democrat wants to pass laws to INCREASE protection for himself by surrounding himself with armed secret service, and has a voting record like this:Stingray24 wrote:
Proposed bill would expand protection the President to Congress, Senate, and federal judges.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- … -lawmakers
Is this beyond the level that the President is currently protected? Discuss ...
Only if you're an idiot. He isn't asking for armed protection.lowing wrote:
Should it bother me that he thinks he deserves the protection of a fire arm and votes it away from the rest of us?
what is the secret service? Did I mis-read where he said judges congressmen etc should get the same protection as the president?mikkel wrote:
Only if you're an idiot. He isn't asking for armed protection.lowing wrote:
Should it bother me that he thinks he deserves the protection of a fire arm and votes it away from the rest of us?
No, you misread where he said they should have the same protection fromlowing wrote:
what is the secret service? Did I mis-read where he said judges congressmen etc should get the same protection as the president?mikkel wrote:
Only if you're an idiot. He isn't asking for armed protection.lowing wrote:
Should it bother me that he thinks he deserves the protection of a fire arm and votes it away from the rest of us?
You only read what you want to believe...article wrote:
make it a federal crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a federal official or member of Congress.
you mean, I am currently protected to threaten a judge or a congressman, just not the president?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
No, you misread where he said they should have the same protection fromlowing wrote:
what is the secret service? Did I mis-read where he said judges congressmen etc should get the same protection as the president?mikkel wrote:
Only if you're an idiot. He isn't asking for armed protection.You only read what you want to believe...article wrote:
make it a federal crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a federal official or member of Congress.
no like secret service protectionAussieReaper wrote:
What like a decoy Airforce 1 that follows judges around when they take a flight somewhere so the terrorists don't know which aircraft to target?
Not my fault you don't know how to comprehend a simple sentence. Reading comprehension is pretty underrated.lowing wrote:
you mean, I am currently protected to threaten a judge or a congressman, just not the president?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
No, you misread where he said they should have the same protection fromlowing wrote:
what is the secret service? Did I mis-read where he said judges congressmen etc should get the same protection as the president?You only read what you want to believe...article wrote:
make it a federal crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a federal official or member of Congress.
Sorry, when he said he wants to be afforded the same protection as the president, I mistakenly thought he meant he wanted to be afforded the same protection as the president. Silly me.
Then Ken, passing laws to out-law threatening a govt. official has nothing to do with presidential level security then does it? They are 2 different things. So which is it, does he want the protection like that afforded to the president, LIKE HE SAID. Or does he want a law to make it illegal to threaten govt. officials, LIKE HE SAID?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Not my fault you don't know how to comprehend a simple sentence. Reading comprehension is pretty underrated.lowing wrote:
you mean, I am currently protected to threaten a judge or a congressman, just not the president?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
No, you misread where he said they should have the same protection fromlowing wrote:
what is the secret service? Did I mis-read where he said judges congressmen etc should get the same protection as the president?
You only read what you want to believe...
Sorry, when he said he wants to be afforded the same protection as the president, I mistakenly thought he meant he wanted to be afforded the same protection as the president. Silly me.
Pages: 1 2
