Hyperbole is your argument and Therine lies your problem.presidentsheep wrote:
... I use hyperbole in debate.
Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2011-01-14 05:09:09)
Well who was in my video if not the Tea Party?
And don't say it's lamestream media because that was taken with an iphone from a public citizen.
And don't say it's lamestream media because that was taken with an iphone from a public citizen.
Some nut or a plant. My point is that person is an anomalie if in the Party at all. Clearly anyone can walk up to these things and do what they want but The Typical Tea Party members are my mom and step Father. WWII age people. Quite, Nice, Polite, Worried.AussieReaper wrote:
Well who was in my video if not the Tea Party?
And don't say it's lamestream media because that was taken with an iphone from a public citizen.
You don't remember the suprise people had after the Huge 8-28 rally left the Mall in DC so spotless ? and a day or two later some minuscule left wing Rally of 800 people totally trashed it including the War Memorial.
Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2011-01-14 05:27:12)
Why would the Tea Party endorse a nut? Or is it the nuts that endorse the Tea Party?Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Some nut or a plant. My point is that person is an anomalie if in the Party at all. Clearly anyone can walk up to these things and do what they want but The Typical Tea Party members are my mom and step Father. WWII age people. Quite, Nice, Polite, Worried.AussieReaper wrote:
Well who was in my video if not the Tea Party?
And don't say it's lamestream media because that was taken with an iphone from a public citizen.
And how would this guy possibly be a plant? And a plant for who, the Democrats?
Oh I'm just trying to follow the rebuttles you've put forth.
This is obviously not the Tea Party.
The Tea Party endorsed candidate is a plant.
1st hand experience Trumps google search and hyper link.
Did I miss anything?
This is obviously not the Tea Party.
The Tea Party endorsed candidate is a plant.
1st hand experience Trumps google search and hyper link.
Did I miss anything?
I live in one of the most dodgy areas in London (New Cross). Right in amongst all the highest gun and knife crime areas.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Please look up the words debate and discussion.presidentsheep wrote:
well then your suspicions are baseless and therefore irrelevant to the discussion, move along.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
get the Key word ?
I would like to see London's dodgy bits compared to say D.C. - L.A. - Baltimore or Detroit and the demographics of each.
It's not really very dodgy tbh. I certainly don't think twice about walking through any areas near me late at night.
I never said or intended this as my meaning. Sorry I just meant that dude shouting is not a Tea Party Member. I am sure there was a professional Baseball player with one leg but it would not be remiss of me to say professional athletes are specimens of peak fitness. Now you'll paste up some Bowler drinking a beer, you get my drift'AussieReaper wrote:
Oh I'm just trying to follow the rebuttles you've put forth.
This is obviously not the Tea Party.
The Tea Party endorsed candidate is a plant.?
in your opinion which would be considered better research ? or more admissible in a court of law. you can find a hyperlink to support any view may I suggest Aliens walk among us PROOF ... cut and past that into google. I bet it pulls up something good.AussieReaper wrote:
1st hand experience Trumps google search and hyper link.
please re read as I amended my post above.AussieReaper wrote:
Did I miss anything
Yea I don't know if I'd make that comparison hunter. You picked some really bad us cities .. throw newark on the list to.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
whats the demographic ? ps "dodgy" I lifted of my Brit GF ~ been dying to use that.Bertster7 wrote:
I live in one of the most dodgy areas in London (New Cross). Right in amongst all the highest gun and knife crime areas.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Please look up the words debate and discussion.presidentsheep wrote:
well then your suspicions are baseless and therefore irrelevant to the discussion, move along.
I would like to see London's dodgy bits compared to say D.C. - L.A. - Baltimore or Detroit and the demographics of each.
It's not really very dodgy tbh. I certainly don't think twice about walking through any areas near me late at night.
my point is What makes THESE CITIES bad ? there are other places ( poor ones too ) with guns up the ass with no crime, Its not the gunsKmar wrote:
Yea I don't know if I'd make that comparison hunter. You picked some really bad us cities .. throw newark on the list to.
What do you mean "the demographic"?Hunter/Jumper wrote:
whats the demographic ? ps "dodgy" I lifted of my Brit GF ~ been dying to use that.Bertster7 wrote:
I live in one of the most dodgy areas in London (New Cross). Right in amongst all the highest gun and knife crime areas.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Please look up the words debate and discussion.
I would like to see London's dodgy bits compared to say D.C. - L.A. - Baltimore or Detroit and the demographics of each.
It's not really very dodgy tbh. I certainly don't think twice about walking through any areas near me late at night.
Yea.. truth be told it can happen anywhere. I was held up in hyde park .. which is full of million dollar homes.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
my point is What makes THESE CITIES bad ? there are other places ( poor ones too ) with guns up the ass with no crime, Its not the gunsKmar wrote:
Yea I don't know if I'd make that comparison hunter. You picked some really bad us cities .. throw newark on the list to.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Watch less John Stewart.AussieReaper wrote:
Yes, it is the Tea Party.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
that is not " The Tea Party " . SorryAussieReaper wrote:
I had no idea the Tea Party would actually storm the Democrat congress winner just to hurl anti semite abuse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOeRGjkC42g
How much more charged up can you get a crowd like that before a congressman is attacked?
Maybe you missed the part when the Tea Party candidate Popaditch confronted Filner?
Because it sure as hell looked like a Tea Party member and cadidate to me.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
I got robbed/mugged in Norwich... Fucking NorwichKmar wrote:
Yea.. truth be told it can happen anywhere. I was held up in hyde park .. which is full of million dollar homes.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
my point is What makes THESE CITIES bad ? there are other places ( poor ones too ) with guns up the ass with no crime, Its not the gunsKmar wrote:
Yea I don't know if I'd make that comparison hunter. You picked some really bad us cities .. throw newark on the list to.
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
gtg by TY 4 your time pres sheep & Aussie... check in l8ter
Um... I'm pretty sure Obama would agree with you. I think he wants to encourage people to tone the rhetoric down, but as you can see, he's not blaming any side for this attack.Kmar wrote:
Blaming the left or the right is pretty fucking stupid. Why aren't we seeing hundreds of these killings going on if rhetoric is to blame? Obviously there was little logic going on in loughner's brain. He began shooting indiscriminately. Do you know what that means? His mental wiring was all wrong. (note: i am not making a case for insanity) Anyone who has studied the mind of a psychopath knows that ANYTHING can set them off. Yes, there are some people who are motivated by extreme politics. But that does not mean extreme politics is to blame. There are others that hear the rhetoric of extreme politics and they don't kill people. How do you explain that? I read a book once about the Son of Sam. In it they described how just seeing a woman walking down the street would send him into a killing spree. Are we supposed to stop all women from walking down the street? Look at this guys history. He was all kinds of threatening for all kinds of reasons.
Both sides have used irresponsible language in the past. I think it is deplorable. Not because it is sending people into a shooting spree, but because it is polarizing us as a nation.
fuck that. Obama complimented the Sheriff on his work... What has the Sheriff done other then impede the investigation? He's the one who started making he accusations. The Bamster himself is all about incendiary remarks. "Whos ass to kick" "They bring a knife we bring a gun"... Then you got biden talking about "blooding their noses"...Turquoise wrote:
Um... I'm pretty sure Obama would agree with you. I think he wants to encourage people to tone the rhetoric down, but as you can see, he's not blaming any side for this attack.Kmar wrote:
Blaming the left or the right is pretty fucking stupid. Why aren't we seeing hundreds of these killings going on if rhetoric is to blame? Obviously there was little logic going on in loughner's brain. He began shooting indiscriminately. Do you know what that means? His mental wiring was all wrong. (note: i am not making a case for insanity) Anyone who has studied the mind of a psychopath knows that ANYTHING can set them off. Yes, there are some people who are motivated by extreme politics. But that does not mean extreme politics is to blame. There are others that hear the rhetoric of extreme politics and they don't kill people. How do you explain that? I read a book once about the Son of Sam. In it they described how just seeing a woman walking down the street would send him into a killing spree. Are we supposed to stop all women from walking down the street? Look at this guys history. He was all kinds of threatening for all kinds of reasons.
Both sides have used irresponsible language in the past. I think it is deplorable. Not because it is sending people into a shooting spree, but because it is polarizing us as a nation.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
It obviously comes from both sides. We're now to the point of blaming people for "starting it". This juvenile tit for tat mentality is so ridiculous. I wish this nation would just grow the fuck up.
and yea DB you're right on that account. What business is it of the Sheriff to talk politics hours after he had bodies laying in his streets? I know he is elected into his position, so he probably feels compelled to offer up his opinion. But there is a time and place. Get to work you jive ass fool.
and yea DB you're right on that account. What business is it of the Sheriff to talk politics hours after he had bodies laying in his streets? I know he is elected into his position, so he probably feels compelled to offer up his opinion. But there is a time and place. Get to work you jive ass fool.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Oh I agree with you 100% there. It does come from both sides and is petty. But the difference is that one side is trying to silence the other.Kmar wrote:
It obviously comes from both sides. We're now to the point of blaming people for "starting it". This juvenile tit for tat mentality is so ridiculous. I wish this nation would just grow the fuck up.
and yea DB you're right on that account. What business is it of the Sheriff to talk politics hours after he had bodies laying in his streets? I know he is elected into his position, so he probably feels compelled to offer up his opinion. But there is a time and place. Get to work you jive ass fool.
Apparently this isn't the first time the Sheriff had acted like this. Also his office is pulling a refusal in releasing documents related to fucko -which is not in accordance with the laws of the land.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Neither side will admit it though. And from what I've seen the majority of people know that this is what it is. A senseless murder
Again, look at what we have learned about this guy. He was a mental case. That isn't to say I don't think we should be discussing the consequences of irresponsible talk. But don't decide to pick up the issue for the wrong reasons, when people are still mourning. And don't come to conclusions when an investigation hasn't even begun. .. which is exactly what happened.
Again, look at what we have learned about this guy. He was a mental case. That isn't to say I don't think we should be discussing the consequences of irresponsible talk. But don't decide to pick up the issue for the wrong reasons, when people are still mourning. And don't come to conclusions when an investigation hasn't even begun. .. which is exactly what happened.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I don't understand the hatred the left has for Palin tbh.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
She is right wing and former vp candidate so she was threatening to the media that is why they bashed her and continue to bash because she could be a potential threat in 2012 as well, plain simple.JohnG@lt wrote:
I don't understand the hatred the left has for Palin tbh.
Last edited by War Man (2011-01-14 07:35:11)
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
No there's more to it than that. She bothers people on some primal level.War Man wrote:
She is right wing, plain simple.JohnG@lt wrote:
I don't understand the hatred the left has for Palin tbh.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
I edited my postJohnG@lt wrote:
No there's more to it than that. She bothers people on some primal level.War Man wrote:
She is right wing, plain simple.JohnG@lt wrote:
I don't understand the hatred the left has for Palin tbh.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.