Well, I think the chances of that happening are pretty low.JohnG@lt wrote:
Sure, but it doesn't require a universal government. We already have the World Bank and other NGOs set up. All they would have to do is print money to replace current currencies. Voila! Done. No more currency wars, no more devaluations, no more currency pegging, no more currency trading. Simple. Straightforward. Effective.
It's the only way free trade will really work.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- German Public Starting to Support Return to Mark
Of course its low. Convincing any government to give up part of its power is a pipe dream. The creation of the Euro was really nothing short of a miracle.Turquoise wrote:
Well, I think the chances of that happening are pretty low.JohnG@lt wrote:
Sure, but it doesn't require a universal government. We already have the World Bank and other NGOs set up. All they would have to do is print money to replace current currencies. Voila! Done. No more currency wars, no more devaluations, no more currency pegging, no more currency trading. Simple. Straightforward. Effective.
It's the only way free trade will really work.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Would you support a North American unified currency?
I would, it would be a step towards a world currency.Turquoise wrote:
Would you support a North American unified currency?
Side note, what are the downsides of a single currency?
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
I think a world currency would be a step closer to a world government, so that's part of why I'm against it.
Just because there's a single currency in the world doesn't mean the entire world would be under one government. In a realistic view, all the major countries would have a single currency and there would still be other smaller countries (or even some major ones) would probably resist.Turquoise wrote:
I think a world currency would be a step closer to a world government, so that's part of why I'm against it.
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
So the US and Mexico should go to the Amero now?JG wrote:
Except for the last one, these are all precisely the reasons why you would want a unified currency.
Fuck Israel
apparently so... lolDilbert_X wrote:
So the US and Mexico should go to the Amero now?JG wrote:
Except for the last one, these are all precisely the reasons why you would want a unified currency.
Yep. I see no reason not to.Dilbert_X wrote:
So the US and Mexico should go to the Amero now?JG wrote:
Except for the last one, these are all precisely the reasons why you would want a unified currency.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
you people have obv never been to mexico. the de facto currency is the dollar. . .
Fair point, but that's a bit different from officially sharing the same currency.burnzz wrote:
you people have obv never been to mexico. the de facto currency is the dollar. . .
- globefish23
- sophisticated slacker
- +334|6598|Graz, Austria
It doesn't matter in which currency your economy is failing and your stock markets are crashing.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- German Public Starting to Support Return to Mark