Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6645|North Carolina

Poseidon wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

I <3 my Representative

The incoming chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee wants the Obama administration to aggressively pursue WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange.

Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) says he’s asked Attorney General Eric Holder to take quick action. “I am calling on the attorney general and supporting his efforts to fully prosecute WikiLeaks and its founder for violating the Espionage Act,” King told a New York radio station.
King, now the ranking Republican on the homeland security panel, also asked Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to determine whether it’s possible to declare WikiLeaks a foreign terrorist organization. Doing that, he said, would give the U.S. government authority “to seize their funds and go after anyone who provides them with any help or contributions or assistance whatsoever.”

And the congressman said he believes his call for action will get plenty of congressional backing. “I’m confident you’ll find many people in the Congress, the House and Senate, who will support my demand for the prosecution and also the declaring of WikiLeaks to be a foreign terrorist organization,” he said.

The latest document dump from WikiLeaks has put "American lives at risk all over the world," King said. "This is worse even than a physical attack on Americans, it's worse than a military attack."
Peter King can be a dick and extremely conservative, but stuff like this is why I just can't hate him. Would rather have him over Bishop any day of the week.
Well, it looks like Altschuler may defeat Bishop.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6778|Long Island, New York

Turquoise wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

I <3 my Representative
Peter King can be a dick and extremely conservative, but stuff like this is why I just can't hate him. Would rather have him over Bishop any day of the week.
Well, it looks like Altschuler may defeat Bishop.
I'm registered in NY-8, not NY-1.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5598|London, England

Poseidon wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Peter King can be a dick and extremely conservative, but stuff like this is why I just can't hate him. Would rather have him over Bishop any day of the week.
Well, it looks like Altschuler may defeat Bishop.
I'm registered in NY-8, not NY-1.
My district is basically TOBAY
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/97/New_York_District_03_109th_US_Congress.png

The representative for where I live now is Anthony Weiner though Never changed my residency for voting.

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-11-29 10:11:57)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6861|London, England

JohnG@lt wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

I'm all about free speech, but not when it comes at the expense of human lives. The information he has posted has undoubtedly already led to deaths in Afghanistan. Whether it's Afghan tribesmen or coalition soldiers, he has blood on his hands. Assange is a murderer, not a hero.
That's abit dramatic, at the end of the day it's a war going on. So the people responsible for the deaths are the guys who initiated it in the first place. People can be blamed for making things worse indirectly, but it's not much in the scope of the entire conflict itself.
No, it's not dramatic at all. He might as well be working for the Taliban and Al Quaeda and should be treated as at the very least an enemy combatant at this point.
Americans start two wars/all sorts of shit around the world and then will always use any opportunity to blame everyone else except themselves and the enemy for their men dying.

The info being leaked makes some peoples jobs abit harder, that's all. If any deaths do occur I'm sure it would be just as easy to not blame the leaks as it is to blame them. Like I said, doing stupid shit around the world leads to stupid shit coming back, leaks or no leaks.

I sort of hope the US does get pissed off enough to designate Wikileaks as a terror organisation and go crazy on them, it would just be very interesting.

Last edited by Mekstizzle (2010-11-29 10:35:32)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6645|North Carolina

Mekstizzle wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:


That's abit dramatic, at the end of the day it's a war going on. So the people responsible for the deaths are the guys who initiated it in the first place. People can be blamed for making things worse indirectly, but it's not much in the scope of the entire conflict itself.
No, it's not dramatic at all. He might as well be working for the Taliban and Al Quaeda and should be treated as at the very least an enemy combatant at this point.
Americans start two wars/all sorts of shit around the world and then will always use any opportunity to blame everyone else except themselves and the enemy for their men dying.

The info being leaked makes some peoples jobs abit harder, that's all. If any deaths do occur I'm sure it would be just as easy to not blame the leaks as it is to blame them. Like I said, doing stupid shit around the world leads to stupid shit coming back, leaks or no leaks.

I sort of hope the US does get pissed off enough to designate Wikileaks as a terror organisation and go crazy on them, it would just be very interesting.
While some of the blame we've thrown around is misplaced, Assange is not one of those cases.

There's a very easily definable connection between what he is doing and how it aids our enemies.  That's not often the case with some of the other people we've targeted.  At this point, Assange is fair game.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6841|132 and Bush

dayarath wrote:

Uzique wrote:

[
have you missed the last few decades of internet history?
There has never been this much attention to an internet-based company.
Matt Drudge .. especially when he broke the lewinski scandal.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Wreckognize
Member
+294|6725
I like how everyone here is portraying Assange like some super villain bent on bringing down the US.  Wikileaks releases what is leaked to them.  They don't control what leaks they get or where they come from.  The United States will naturally attract the most leaks because we are the biggest player on the world stage.  I respect what Assange is trying to do; corporations and governments will never be voluntarily transparent.  Speaking of corporations, the next leak is apparently related to a major bank.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5598|London, England

Wreckognize wrote:

I like how everyone here is portraying Assange like some super villain bent on bringing down the US.  Wikileaks releases what is leaked to them.  They don't control what leaks they get or where they come from.  The United States will naturally attract the most leaks because we are the biggest player on the world stage.  I respect what Assange is trying to do; corporations and governments will never be voluntarily transparent.  Speaking of corporations, the next leak is apparently related to a major bank.
Of course you respect him, you're a drug addicted moron that lives in his moms basement. Fight the power, son.

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-11-29 18:01:45)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Wreckognize
Member
+294|6725
Wrong, try again.  Why so bitter old man? 

Also ad hominem fallacy.  See I learned that in college, which is where I am when I'm not in my mom basement doing drugs.

Last edited by Wreckognize (2010-11-29 18:07:16)

Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6915|Canberra, AUS

JohnG@lt wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Well, it looks like Altschuler may defeat Bishop.
I'm registered in NY-8, not NY-1.
My district is basically TOBAY
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … ngress.png

The representative for where I live now is Anthony Weiner though Never changed my residency for voting.
You guys are almost as bad as us at naming things. "Hicksville"... really?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6872|949

you seem to have no qualms throwing out generalizations there galt.

Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you don't know everything and everyone.  Sorry : (
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5598|London, England

Wreckognize wrote:

Wrong, try again.  Why so bitter old man?
Because Assange is a fucking awful human being and nothing worthy of respect. He's putting your own countrymen in danger. "Wikileaks only publishes what is handed to them" yeah ok, so they have to publish everything that's handed to them? I'm gonna take a shit on a piece of cardboard and mail it to them, will they publish that? Free wills a bitch and I hope to god he signed his own death warrant.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6872|949

One could argue that the bosses in charge are the ones putting our countrymen in danger; Wikileaks is just exposing it.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5598|London, England

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

One could argue that the bosses in charge are the ones putting our countrymen in danger; Wikileaks is just exposing it.
I thought Afghanistan was 'the good war'. When did that change?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6872|949

JohnG@lt wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

One could argue that the bosses in charge are the ones putting our countrymen in danger; Wikileaks is just exposing it.
I thought Afghanistan was 'the good war'. When did that change?
Huh?  Barking up the wrong tree methinks. 

I'd love to hear what you have me pegged as though.  Do tell.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5598|London, England

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

One could argue that the bosses in charge are the ones putting our countrymen in danger; Wikileaks is just exposing it.
I thought Afghanistan was 'the good war'. When did that change?
Huh?  Barking up the wrong tree methinks. 

I'd love to hear what you have me pegged as though.  Do tell.
Well, you seem to have taken the anti war stance with 'bosses in charge are etc'.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Wreckognize
Member
+294|6725
Guess what...going into pointless wars puts people in danger.  Staying in pointless wars puts people in danger.  Wikileaks doesn't publish everything that's submitted, they get massive amounts of submissions but only have so much publishing capabilities.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6346|eXtreme to the maX

JohnG@lt wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

One could argue that the bosses in charge are the ones putting our countrymen in danger; Wikileaks is just exposing it.
I thought Afghanistan was 'the good war'. When did that change?
Hunting AQ was the 'good war'. No idea what Afghanistan is now.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-11-29 18:25:59)

Fuck Israel
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5598|London, England

Wreckognize wrote:

Guess what...going into pointless wars puts people in danger.  Staying in pointless wars puts people in danger.  Wikileaks doesn't publish everything that's submitted, they get massive amounts of submissions but only have so much publishing capabilities.
Hey Mr. Pothead Basement dweller, I forget, did we start the war in Afghanistan or did it start because some buildings were dropped about 180 miles from your mom's house?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6346|eXtreme to the maX
Erm, wasn't 9/11 done by Saudis?

And didn't they do much of their training in Florida? Why not nuke Florida?

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-11-29 18:26:53)

Fuck Israel
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5598|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

Erm, wasn't 9/11 done by Saudis?
And where did they train? Where was Bin Laden hiding? Oh yeah, he was chilling with the Taliban.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5598|London, England
The shits hilarious. I remember getting this chain letter in 1999:

The government of Afghanistan is waging a war upon women. The situation is getting so bad that one person in an editorial of the times compared the treatment of women there to the treatment of Jews in pre-Holocaust Poland.

Since the Taliban took power in 1996, women have had to wear burqua and have been beaten and stoned in public for not having the proper attire, even if this means simply not having the mesh covering in front of their eyes. One woman was beaten to DEATH by an angry mob of fundamentalists for accidentally exposing her arm while she was driving. Another was stoned to death for trying to leave the country with a man that was not a relative.

Women are not allowed to work or even go out in public without a male relative; professional women such as professors, translators, doctors, lawyers, artists and writers have been forced from their jobs and stuffed into their homes, so that depression is becoming so widespread that it has reached emergency levels. There is no way in such an extreme Islamic society to know the suicide rate with certainty, but relief workers are estimating that the suicide rate among women, who cannot find proper medication and treatment for severe depression and would rather take their lives than live in such conditions, has increased significantly.

Homes where a woman is present must have their windows painted so that she can never be seen by outsiders. They must wear silent shoes so that they are never heard. Women live in fear of their lives for the slightest misbehavior. Because they cannot work, those without male relatives or husbands are either starving to death or begging on the street, even if they hold Ph.D.'s. There are almost no medical facilities available for women, and relief workers, in protest, have mostly left the country, taking medicine and psychologists and other things necessary to treat the skyrocketing level of depression among women. At one of the rare hospitals for women, a reporter found still, nearly lifeless bodies lying motionless on top of beds, wrapped in their burqua, unwilling to speak, eat, or do anything, but slowly wasting away. Others have gone mad and were seen crouched in corners, perpetually rocking or crying, most of them in fear.

It is at the point where the term 'human rights violations' has become an understatement. Husbands have the power of life and death over their women relatives, especially their wives, but an angry mob has just as much right to stone or beat a woman, often to death, for exposing an inch of flesh or offending them in the slightest way. David Cornwell has told me that we in the United States should not judge the Afghan people for such treatment because it is a 'cultural thing', but this is not even true. Women enjoyed relative freedom, to work, dress generally as they wanted, and drive and appear in public alone until only 1996 — the rapidity of this transition is the main reason for the depression and suicide; women who were once educators or doctors or simply used to basic human freedoms are now severely restricted and treated as sub-human in the name of right-wing fundamentalist Islam. It is not their tradition or 'culture', but is alien to them, and it is extreme even for those cultures where fundamentalism is the rule. Besides, if we could excuse everything on cultural grounds, then we should not be appalled that the Carthaginians sacrificed their infant children, that little girls are circumcised in parts of Africa, that blacks in the deep south in the 1930s were lynched, prohibited from voting and forced to submit to unjust Jim Crow laws.

Everyone has a right to a tolerable human existence, even if they are women in a Muslim country in a part of the world that Americans do not understand.

If we can threaten military force in Kosovo in the name of human rights for the sake of ethnic Albanians, Americans can certainly express peaceful outrage at the oppression, murder and injustice committed against women by the Taliban.
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/petition/afghani.asp

And now the same people that were rah rah we should do something about it are now crying they want the war to end and the Taliban reinstalled as the rightful rulers.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6915|Canberra, AUS
Problem is most of those people think "This is how things should be!" without ever actually thinking about how that would actually be achieved and the consequences of such actions.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6872|949

JohnG@lt wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


I thought Afghanistan was 'the good war'. When did that change?
Huh?  Barking up the wrong tree methinks. 

I'd love to hear what you have me pegged as though.  Do tell.
Well, you seem to have taken the anti war stance with 'bosses in charge are etc'.
What?  You seem to be slipping deeper and deeper into ignorant zone.  Is it past your bedtime or something?  I'm sure you're trying to make a point, but you might want to explain it to someone who isn't mensa qualified LOL.  I mean, one time I took one of those online IQ tests and I was at like 160, but I don't trust the internet.

Actually I'm probably one of the few here that's taken a 'legitimate' IQ test or two, but I'd be insane to think that score would somehow translate to how well I can 'debate' on the internet.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5598|London, England

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Huh?  Barking up the wrong tree methinks. 

I'd love to hear what you have me pegged as though.  Do tell.
Well, you seem to have taken the anti war stance with 'bosses in charge are etc'.
What?  You seem to be slipping deeper and deeper into ignorant zone.  Is it past your bedtime or something?  I'm sure you're trying to make a point, but you might want to explain it to someone who isn't mensa qualified LOL.  I mean, one time I took one of those online IQ tests and I was at like 160, but I don't trust the internet.

Actually I'm probably one of the few here that's taken a 'legitimate' IQ test or two, but I'd be insane to think that score would somehow translate to how well I can 'debate' on the internet.
What does that have to do with anything? The way you worded your post it made you seem as if you were in the anti-war camp. If that was incorrect, fine.

I'm not understanding how it's the fault of 'the bosses in charge' who are somehow putting their soldiers in danger when they are doing everything they can to protect the lives of their soldiers. The leak has already led to the killings of numerous Afghan tribesmen who were aiding us, and undoubtedly a few soldier deaths as well. All of that is blood on Assange's hands.

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-11-29 18:44:55)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard