Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6175|Ireland
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/10/ … latestnews

"Whatever happened to the X-37B?

An unmanned vehicle with unknown intent, the X-37B has been orbiting the Earth for 173 days since its launch on April 22. Since its launch, the spaceship has captured the imagination of skywatchers, military experts and conspiracy theorists worldwide.

It has the payload of a medium-sized truck, so maybe its purpose is to ferry spy satellites into orbit. It can return to Earth after a single orbit, so perhaps it can pick said satellites up again after they've done their work and before they've been spotted by the enemy. Some say it may signal the start of the weaponization of space.

Whatever it is, it's an impressive piece of technology that at the very least has unparalleled capacity to generate headlines.

Now, for the second time since it launched, it's disappeared and the race is on once again to a) find it, then b) offer a plausible theory about what it's up to this time.

The U.S. Air Force launched the robotic X-37B space plane in April, on a space mission that months later is still cloaked in secrecy.

Back in late July, the X-37B went AWOL for nearly two weeks off its regular flight path. When it was found, by amateur skywatcher Greg Roberts of Cape Town, South Africa, its new trajectory proved the shuttle was much more versatile than previously thought, with a "cross-range" wing set-up that may allow it to compensate for the slight turn in the Earth after a single orbit and land back on its original launch pad.

Now it's gone missing again, failing to pass over its regular flight path on October 7 and 9, according to UniverseToday. This time around, the alarm bells have started ringing much earlier, thanks to the extra scrutiny offered by how-to video guides and apps such as the Simple Satellite Tracker which popped up after its first disappearance.

Track satellites from within the U.S. and Canada

Yet despite the extra public surveillance, no one's been able to pick it up on a new flight path, leading to speculation that maybe this time around, the Air Force is preparing to land its experiment.

According to forum member "Slenke" at militaryphotos.net, its last known orbit "put it very close to Vandenberg AFB," one of the two sites expected to receive the X-37B. The other is Edwards Air Force Base, a second base also in in California.

The X-37B's solar array allows it to stay aloft for 270 days, but even top brass at the U.S. Air Force can't -. or won't .- say when it will land again.

“In all honesty, we don’t know when it’s coming back,” Air Force spokesman Gary Payton told reporters when it was launched. At that time, the main issue concerning the shuttle's makers was what kind of condition it would land in and whether it would be fit for reuse within a practical, although unspecified, timeframe.

According to the Pentagon, a second X-37B is already under construction. "

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I think the US is using it as a laser platform to destroy satellites and burn its enemies like bugs from outter space.  It just makes sense.  We will know for sure if Sara Palin goes up in flames in 2012 when she takes the lead in the polls or if that Wacky Iranian, Amanandabanjo, goes poof next time he threatens Israel.

See, this is why the US is better than other countries. We make neat things to kill you with.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6593|132 and Bush

I remember watching the launch from my backyard 5 months ago.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=137048
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|5991|Vortex Ring State
Get the tinfoil hats out.

But seriously

That is why the US is great, cause of our massive R&D spending gets results better (more efficiently), especially in the military sector.
13rin
Member
+977|6471
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6098|eXtreme to the maX

Trotskygrad wrote:

our massive R&D spending gets results better (more efficiently), especially in the military sector.
LOL, LOL and LOL.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-10-12 15:45:49)

Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6437|The Land of Scott Walker
D_X thinks aerospace advances are hilarious.
NAthANSmitt
Stud
+4|6121
How do amature sky watchers find and identify these random ass things?
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,736|6729|Oxferd Ohire

Dilbert_X wrote:

Trotskygrad wrote:

our massive R&D spending gets results better (more efficiently), especially in the military sector.
LOL, LOL and LOL.
You forgot a ",".
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
mcjagdflieger
Champion of Dueling Rectums
+26|6303|South Jersey

Dilbert_X wrote:

Trotskygrad wrote:

our massive R&D spending gets results better (more efficiently), especially in the military sector.
LOL, LOL and LOL.
so the U-2, SR-71, F-117, and consequently the B-2 mean nothing to you? Google the Skunk Works or something dude. All of these were accomplished with skeleton crews of engineers and mechanics. People like you are the reason people like me are lurkers.
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,736|6729|Oxferd Ohire
dilbert just likes trashing space type programs
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|6768|Moscow, Russia

Trotskygrad wrote:

Get the tinfoil hats out.

But seriously

That is why the US is great, cause of our massive R&D spending gets results better (more efficiently), especially in the military sector.
what do spendings have to do with results again?
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6708

Shahter wrote:

Trotskygrad wrote:

Get the tinfoil hats out.

But seriously

That is why the US is great, cause of our massive R&D spending gets results better (more efficiently), especially in the military sector.
what do spendings have to do with results again?
well its more effective than putting scientists and their families into gulags now innit.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|6768|Moscow, Russia

Cybargs wrote:

Shahter wrote:

Trotskygrad wrote:

Get the tinfoil hats out.

But seriously

That is why the US is great, cause of our massive R&D spending gets results better (more efficiently), especially in the military sector.
what do spendings have to do with results again?
well its more effective than putting scientists and their families into gulags now innit.
is it really?
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6708

Shahter wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Shahter wrote:


what do spendings have to do with results again?
well its more effective than putting scientists and their families into gulags now innit.
is it really?
yeah if you think the lad is stalling when it's just a hard project. you just lost a good scientist, not the mention the amount of people willing to defect.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|6768|Moscow, Russia

Cybargs wrote:

Shahter wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

well its more effective than putting scientists and their families into gulags now innit.
is it really?
yeah if you think the lad is stalling when it's just a hard project. you just lost a good scientist, not the mention the amount of people willing to defect.
why then to launch stuff in space do they still use souz and the likes designed and built by those who, if one takes the bullshit you posted above seriously, were "put in gulags", istead of employing their awesome r&d-spending skills to do something themselves?

Last edited by Shahter (2010-10-13 03:44:32)

if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
jord
Member
+2,382|6670|The North, beyond the wall.

mcjagdflieger wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Trotskygrad wrote:

our massive R&D spending gets results better (more efficiently), especially in the military sector.
LOL, LOL and LOL.
so the U-2, SR-71, F-117, and consequently the B-2 mean nothing to you? Google the Skunk Works or something dude. All of these were accomplished with skeleton crews of engineers and mechanics. People like you are the reason people like me are lurkers.
What's the reason you lurk?
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6613|London, England
What's so special about this?

From a technology standpoint there's nothing new about this, but even from the whole ''Weaponisation of Space'' standpoint there's nothing new. We already have Spy Satellites, Ballistic missiles which travel through space, anti-satellite weapons (and tests have been done against satellites)

I don't understand the big deal...


I don't even understand how there's any conspiracy behind this, it's nothing special. It's like having pictures of a prototype Submarine or Tank and then talking about how it's a giant conspiracy

----

EDIT

Unless it seems like some sort of reusable SSTO whereby it takes off from earth, goes to space, delivers its payload and then comes back and lands. That's huge, and awesome

But it seems more like that it's launched from a conventional rocket and then comes back to earth, so it's just like a smaller, cheaper, unmanned, less sophisticated version of the Space Shuttle which has been around forever.

Last edited by Mekstizzle (2010-10-13 04:22:01)

Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6708

Mekstizzle wrote:

What's so special about this?

From a technology standpoint there's nothing new about this, but even from the whole ''Weaponisation of Space'' standpoint there's nothing new. We already have Spy Satellites, Ballistic missiles which travel through space, anti-satellite weapons (and tests have been done against satellites)

I don't understand the big deal...


I don't even understand how there's any conspiracy behind this, it's nothing special. It's like having pictures of a prototype Submarine or Tank and then talking about how it's a giant conspiracy

----

EDIT

Unless it seems like some sort of reusable SSTO whereby it takes off from earth, goes to space, delivers its payload and then comes back and lands. That's huge.

But it seems more like that it's launched from a conventional rocket and then comes back to earth, so it's just like a smaller, cheaper, unmanned, less sophisticated version of the Space Shuttle which has been around forever.
russians fitted their shuttles to carry nukes.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6613|London, England
We already have things that carry nukes, go into space, and come back and do bad things. They're called ICBM's and people can even launch them underwater in submarines.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6403|'Murka

Mekstizzle wrote:

What's so special about this?

From a technology standpoint there's nothing new about this, but even from the whole ''Weaponisation of Space'' standpoint there's nothing new. We already have Spy Satellites, Ballistic missiles which travel through space, anti-satellite weapons (and tests have been done against satellites)

I don't understand the big deal...


I don't even understand how there's any conspiracy behind this, it's nothing special. It's like having pictures of a prototype Submarine or Tank and then talking about how it's a giant conspiracy

----

EDIT

Unless it seems like some sort of reusable SSTO whereby it takes off from earth, goes to space, delivers its payload and then comes back and lands. That's huge, and awesome

But it seems more like that it's launched from a conventional rocket and then comes back to earth, so it's just like a smaller, cheaper, unmanned, less sophisticated version of the Space Shuttle which has been around forever.
If it has the ability to change orbits and carry a payload--which it appears to be able to do--that is huge. Changing orbits is no small thing, the implications of which, when paired with the payload aspect, are rather large from both a commercial and military perspective.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6708

Mekstizzle wrote:

We already have things that carry nukes, go into space, and come back and do bad things. They're called ICBM's and people can even launch them underwater in submarines.
thing about the shuttle is that it's near undectable afaik.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
jord
Member
+2,382|6670|The North, beyond the wall.

Cybargs wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

We already have things that carry nukes, go into space, and come back and do bad things. They're called ICBM's and people can even launch them underwater in submarines.
thing about the shuttle is that it's near undectable afaik.
Apart from by south african amateur observers...
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6708

jord wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

We already have things that carry nukes, go into space, and come back and do bad things. They're called ICBM's and people can even launch them underwater in submarines.
thing about the shuttle is that it's near undectable afaik.
Apart from by south african amateur observers...
well by the time it's detected it would've nuked a couple of cities already.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Acerider
Stupid keyboard is stuck
+32|5002|Ontario, Canada
This is just adding to the "conspiracy mumbo-jumbo" but it could also be used to spread biowarfare agents and the like through the atmosphere. It's probably just spying on something, really.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6708

Acerider wrote:

This is just adding to the "conspiracy mumbo-jumbo" but it could also be used to spread biowarfare agents and the like through the atmosphere. It's probably just spying on something, really.
stfu pace. you dont need a fucking space craft to spread ebola in populated cities.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard