Announcement

Join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/nf43FxS
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|4356|Cleveland, Ohio

Bevo wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

Bevo wrote:

good thing they're not set in stone eh, you know, reviewed and all

clearly it's against the law. doesn't make it any less stupid
same with some little slut suing for money.

i would charge her with possession and settle for 33k.
this is one of the rare cases where a lawsuit actually makes some sense, violation of privacy and all. i'd rather the teacher fired
privacy and kids is a whole different issue.  its a fine line

Last edited by 11 Bravo (2010-09-21 23:57:14)

Ultrafunkula
Hector: Ding, ding, ding, ding...
+1,975|5593|6 6 4 oh, I forget

Bevo wrote:

this is one of the rare cases where a lawsuit actually makes some sense, violation of privacy and all. i'd rather the teacher fired
Ultrafunkula
Hector: Ding, ding, ding, ding...
+1,975|5593|6 6 4 oh, I forget

11 Bravo wrote:

Bevo wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:


same with some little slut suing for money.

i would charge her with possession and settle for 33k.
this is one of the rare cases where a lawsuit actually makes some sense, violation of privacy and all. i'd rather the teacher fired
privacy and kids is a whole different issue.  its a fine line
So you think it's ok for a teacher to go through someones personal belongings?
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|4356|Cleveland, Ohio

Ultrafunkula wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

Bevo wrote:


this is one of the rare cases where a lawsuit actually makes some sense, violation of privacy and all. i'd rather the teacher fired
privacy and kids is a whole different issue.  its a fine line
So you think it's ok for a teacher to go through someones personal belongings?
well schools can go thru lockers and such with probable cause.  like i said a fine line.
Bevo
Nah
+718|5640|Austin, Texas

11 Bravo wrote:

Bevo wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

same with some little slut suing for money.

i would charge her with possession and settle for 33k.
this is one of the rare cases where a lawsuit actually makes some sense, violation of privacy and all. i'd rather the teacher fired
privacy and kids is a whole different issue.  its a fine line
legal guardians maybe, public school teachers fuck no

ed: probable cause for what, nudie pictures? there was nothing to suspect

Last edited by Bevo (2010-09-22 00:00:10)

Ultrafunkula
Hector: Ding, ding, ding, ding...
+1,975|5593|6 6 4 oh, I forget

11 Bravo wrote:

Ultrafunkula wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:


privacy and kids is a whole different issue.  its a fine line
So you think it's ok for a teacher to go through someones personal belongings?
well schools can go thru lockers and such with probable cause.  like i said a fine line.
Yeah, well the teacher probably thought she was al qaida and went through the phone just to be on the safe side that she doesn't have any bombing and/or school shooting plans there
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|4356|Cleveland, Ohio
fuck sake you two i dunno all the facts nor do you all i am saying is they can go thru kids stuff in some cases

Last edited by 11 Bravo (2010-09-22 00:04:49)

Ultrafunkula
Hector: Ding, ding, ding, ding...
+1,975|5593|6 6 4 oh, I forget

11 Bravo wrote:

fuck sake you two i dunno all the facts nor do you all i am saying is they can go thru kids stuff in some cases
Which I actually agree to for the most part (drugs, weapons and so on). But going through some girl's phone is like going through her diary. Big no-no. Ergo, bad teacher! *shakes finger*
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|5929|Nårvei

Ban phones in class already ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|5268|'straya

Varegg wrote:

Ban phones in class already ...
My school did, was good.

I never understood why people had to text friends in the same class as them, or people who they would see in no more than 45 minutes
JahManRed
wank
+646|5747|IRELAND

Nakes photos or GTFO.
PrivateVendetta
I DEMAND XMAS THEME
+704|5310|Roma

11 Bravo wrote:

Ultrafunkula wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:


privacy and kids is a whole different issue.  its a fine line
So you think it's ok for a teacher to go through someones personal belongings?
well schools can go thru lockers and such with probable cause.  like i said a fine line.
lockers are part of the school property..


OT: Pics or gtfo
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/29388/stopped%20scrolling%21.png
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+1,937|5891|USA

The way I see it, both are at fault.

1) The girl should have put her cell phone away and connect with reality for the duration of class.
2) Who the fuck carries naked pictures of themselves around in public?
3) The guy should have just thrown the thing in a desk and given it back to her at the end of class. I can see searching lockers because those are school property, but cell phones are not.
PrivateVendetta
I DEMAND XMAS THEME
+704|5310|Roma
She's perfectly entitled to take photo's of herself. She can store them wherever she wants, as long as they aren't publicly on display IMO. Dunno what the law is over there, but that''s what makes sense to me.
So it's probably illegal in America
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/29388/stopped%20scrolling%21.png
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|5768

I fully support her right to take naked pictures of herself. Assuming she's hot. But I've no idea why you would, imagine if you lost your phone.
jsnipy
...
+3,275|5642|...

11 Bravo wrote:

is it not child porn by definition?
... In the United States. But honestly at 17 you can be married. You don't think charging her with child porn is a bit overkill? I think law needs to the evolve. Calling 'First' on a legal precedent should not mean we stop thinking and evolving.

Honestly she should not settle out of court, actually get a verdict ffs.
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|5885|UK
how could you possible even charge her with child porn? They are pictures of herself.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|5768

Does that mean if I jack off under the age of 16 I'm a child molester?
Ultrafunkula
Hector: Ding, ding, ding, ding...
+1,975|5593|6 6 4 oh, I forget

ghettoperson wrote:

Does that mean if I jack off under the age of 16 I'm a child molester?
Probably. What about a 13yo taking an innocent shower then? We must take this further. Children must not know what lies beneath their heads!
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|5616

i remember when phones were phones.

https://img213.imageshack.us/img213/776/rotaryiphone.jpg
jord
Member
+2,382|5797|The North, beyond the wall.

11 Bravo wrote:

my point is it is against the law.  whether you like the law or not is a seperate issue.
Some legislative technicality has no bearings on discussions here. People generally debate with logic and reason unless of course it is a legal debate.

Logic and common sense say taking pictures of yourself is not child porn. Ever. Never ever.
Winston_Churchill
Bazinga!
+521|5858|Toronto | Canada

11 Bravo wrote:

Ultrafunkula wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:


privacy and kids is a whole different issue.  its a fine line
So you think it's ok for a teacher to go through someones personal belongings?
well schools can go thru lockers and such with probable cause.  like i said a fine line.
they can go through lockers because its their property, their just renting it out to you. 

also, you mean principal fired, not teacher right?  the teacher just confiscated it which is fine by me, it was the principal that went through the pictures and texts
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|5929|Nårvei

That would be the lack-of-kneecaps-syndrome I believe ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Lucien
Fantasma Parastasie
+1,451|5772
https://i.imgur.com/HTmoH.jpg

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2021 Jeff Minard