Oh hey Baggs!
figured I had salmonella about 2 months ago
never ever eat raw / undercooked chicken. Take it from me.
never ever eat raw / undercooked chicken. Take it from me.
inane little opines
Maaaayy have just done that.
How quick does it kick in?
How quick does it kick in?
Was about the next day. If you need to go to the toilet every 30 minutes, and have massive fever might be it. Was too sick to get out of bed and do more than go back and forth to the toilet. Oh and about halfway there was blood and mucus inbetween too I believe.PrivateVendetta wrote:
Maaaayy have just done that.
How quick does it kick in?
And the stomache ache makes you wish you were dead.
If all of the above, don't do it like me and go to a doctor. Took about two weeks to recover.
Last time I felt so sick I was coughing up black slime in Zambia.
inane little opines
Oh awsm. I have exams the whole of this week.
Go for the exams, but if you're hard go eat some more raw chicken.PrivateVendetta wrote:
Oh awsm. I have exams the whole of this week.
Honestly I can handle physical pain, most of it anyway. Feeling like you've been stabbed on the inside of your stomache is fucking horrible.
inane little opines
I should be ok, just wiki'd quickly. It wasn't that undercooked and i didn't eat too much of it anyway before realising.
And I'm solid.
I have that shit once and I can confirm the pain makes you want to end your miserable life.
Got what I figured was a weak ass dose, or maybe I'm just fucking hardcore, felt sick for like 2 days and had eggy burps and farts. That's about it.
it goes pow pow pow pow pow pow pow pow pow
I am making my way through a list of 500 poems. Google 'harmon poetry 500'. If you care to see them.Uzique wrote:
eeerm.. weeeell...Kmar wrote:
my VERY basic 1-line interp
I imagine/wish/dream of better times/things/circumstance but am awaken to the reminder of gloom. .. and the cycle repeats
For a more detailed explanation.
kmar what the hell are you doing reading keats? that's too soppy even for me. i had to take 4 months of endless romanticism.
if you're interested in keats, though, my professor has written a biography on him that is literally one of the best biographies i have ever read, period. it made the entire period, character and poetry infinitely more interesting for me. i think there's a sizable chunk of contextualisation and thematic exploration of your little number, too.
http://www.richmondreview.co.uk/books/keats.html
Xbone Stormsurgezz
shit, salmonella is... fucking bad
anthologies like that are a little bit... vulgar, in my opinion. they're aimed at clueless people that want the pretense of enjoying poetry.Kmar wrote:
I am making my way through a list of 500 poems. Google 'harmon poetry 500'. If you care to see them.Uzique wrote:
eeerm.. weeeell...Kmar wrote:
my VERY basic 1-line interp
I imagine/wish/dream of better times/things/circumstance but am awaken to the reminder of gloom. .. and the cycle repeats
For a more detailed explanation.
kmar what the hell are you doing reading keats? that's too soppy even for me. i had to take 4 months of endless romanticism.
if you're interested in keats, though, my professor has written a biography on him that is literally one of the best biographies i have ever read, period. it made the entire period, character and poetry infinitely more interesting for me. i think there's a sizable chunk of contextualisation and thematic exploration of your little number, too.
http://www.richmondreview.co.uk/books/keats.html
poetry is best understood with its idealisms and context studied as a whole; truly great poetry transcends 'time' but is still steeped in intellectual dialogue with the time it originates from, the author's own personal views/motivations, and the wider society that embraces it. some arbitrary list of the 'x' best poems will almost surely compile some great verse... but the intent and actual full beauty of it will be lost, imo. going from romanticist long lyrical verse to short petrarchan sonnets to free verse modernist symbolism in 5 pages will not help you to 'appreciate' anything. find an area that you particularly enjoy, or a topic/theme you particularly enjoy exploring, and then properly explore it. i can't get my head around poetry anthologies that throw 101 styles and influences at you in as many pages; it just seems as though the full power is completely lost in the overload.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
i read a book this one time
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
agreed.Uzique wrote:
anthologies like that are a little bit... vulgar, in my opinion. they're aimed at clueless people that want the pretense of enjoying poetry.Kmar wrote:
I am making my way through a list of 500 poems. Google 'harmon poetry 500'. If you care to see them.Uzique wrote:
eeerm.. weeeell...
kmar what the hell are you doing reading keats? that's too soppy even for me. i had to take 4 months of endless romanticism.
if you're interested in keats, though, my professor has written a biography on him that is literally one of the best biographies i have ever read, period. it made the entire period, character and poetry infinitely more interesting for me. i think there's a sizable chunk of contextualisation and thematic exploration of your little number, too.
http://www.richmondreview.co.uk/books/keats.html
poetry is best understood with its idealisms and context studied as a whole; truly great poetry transcends 'time' but is still steeped in intellectual dialogue with the time it originates from, the author's own personal views/motivations, and the wider society that embraces it. some arbitrary list of the 'x' best poems will almost surely compile some great verse... but the intent and actual full beauty of it will be lost, imo. going from romanticist long lyrical verse to short petrarchan sonnets to free verse modernist symbolism in 5 pages will not help you to 'appreciate' anything. find an area that you particularly enjoy, or a topic/theme you particularly enjoy exploring, and then properly explore it. i can't get my head around poetry anthologies that throw 101 styles and influences at you in as many pages; it just seems as though the full power is completely lost in the overload.
Nabokov said at one point that one should consider a piece of writing as a whole world in itself, not try to place in in context with the current world or the world in which the author lived.
source: here
nabokov was pretty much writing to repudiate the (then popular) school of historical criticism, which boomed briefly in the early 20th century as the methods of acquiring secondary information/contextual knowledge opened up. people went back and re-read all the classics and all the academic texts in light of new information from history, sociology, psychology etc. to then retroactively 'apply' it to an analysis of said text. it was quite illuminating in certain ways, such as psychoanalytic readings of texts post-Freud or marxian readings of text in the socialist ideological setting of 20thC france-- but, as nabokov rightly identified, it took the emphasis away from studying the text as a complete-whole, and as a self-sufficient work of art. nabokov represents the approach to literature/arts that you would call 'New Criticism', which is precisely that mid-20th century 'reflex' against the urge to over-contextualize and rather miss the point. personally, i think it's best to have a balance of both; you'd be silly to ignore some biographical/historical information that clearly has a pervasive influence, e.g. the political landscape of europe during the time of Keat's Romanticism (revolution in france, the rise of liberalism in england), but you'd be similarly foolish to 'over-apply' certain exterior, inter/con-textual information in a tenuous way.
tl;dr: booooring
tl;dr: booooring
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
i liek crab caeks
uzique, do you have a job?
pancake bunny
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
bout tree fiddy
♥
chuch
tyler can i be on your team pretty please
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
lols the way i play fifa i wouldnt want to but sure
yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella