EE ¢hat$ Augu$t

2010-08-17 09:37:58

#6676

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6920

liquidat0r wrote:
Uzique wrote:
bonus points if you can guess the source-song!
Lady in Red

I didn't cheat, I promise.

fucking pro, innit? oneohtrix point never is a musical genius.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2010-08-17 09:39:12

#6677

Surgeons: U shud proabbly f off u fat prik; +3,097|6939|Gogledd Cymru

Dayvan Cowboy sounds exactly like that bieber son lol, well it does so far.

Try it lickdongs

2010-08-17 09:40:24

#6678

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6920

im sorry but you cunts cannot say dayvan cowboy sounds like a bieber song.

what's the fascination with super-slowing things, anyway? you guys never had a vinyl deck before with pitch-control?

jesus christ it's like its the 1940's all over again or something

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2010-08-17 09:41:27

#6679

Surgeons: U shud proabbly f off u fat prik; +3,097|6939|Gogledd Cymru

Slowed down 8 times it sounds like it, seriously, lick, try it and tell him.

I'm not even lying.

2010-08-17 09:42:11

#6680

liquidat0r: wtf.; +2,223|7077|UK

Well they all sound reasonably similar Olly.

@Uzique, you can when you slow it down 8x.

2010-08-17 09:42:20

#6681

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6920

yeah liq, try and tell me how it sounds like a song i listened to when you guys were still in nappies

no. slowing down sounds to retrograde them and make them 'ambience' is pointless. as i said... get a vinyl deck. wala!

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2010-08-17 09:43:20

#6682

Surgeons: U shud proabbly f off u fat prik; +3,097|6939|Gogledd Cymru

All I said was slowed down 8 times they both sound similar...

Christ.

2010-08-17 09:43:32

#6683

liquidat0r: wtf.; +2,223|7077|UK

Uzique wrote:
yeah liq, try and tell me how it sounds like a song i listened to when you guys were still in nappies

no. slowing down sounds to retrograde them and make them 'ambience' is pointless. as i said... get a vinyl deck. wala!

You're totally missing the point here.

2010-08-17 09:44:50

#6684

Eifa: Never regret anything that ever made you smile.; +923|6321|00770

fact: Lion King is the best movie ever. ever.

No, I don't need an attitude adjustment. You just need to fuck off.

2010-08-17 09:45:41

#6685

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6920

maybe like i missed the point with auto-tune. i just don't see the attraction in slowing down songs so they're completely indistinguishable.

everything becomes a pitch-shifted mud at a certain threshold of extreme-editing. no difference between one voice and another.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2010-08-17 10:04:57

#6686

Toilet Sex: one love, one pig; +1,775|7022

the north west regional news makes me cringe and want to kill myself. or do something less drastic like move.

♥

2010-08-17 10:07:59

#6687

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|7105

Will slowing down a Justin Bieber song accomplish anything ridiculously artistic or somehow become an epic ambient piece? No. It wasn't created to be that way. It isn't structured that way, there's no design to it, nothing symbolic or emotive to it.

But is it entertaining, a good distraction, something to skim through and have a little laugh? Yes; for me, anyway.

2010-08-17 10:34:53