| Dickheads. | 16% | 16% - 21 | ||||
| Alright people. | 32% | 32% - 40 | ||||
| Depends. | 51% | 51% - 64 | ||||
| Total: 125 | ||||||
lol and to think that UK police are light years ahead of our goons down here in banana landUzique wrote:
same avenues of recruitment here in the UK.
except for the officers who are, again, military-dropouts and public-sector/civil-service flunkies.
and you don't have contact with them, anyway.
The hell'd they take you, the Hanoi Hilton?Uzique wrote:
lol i can behave myself too and was arrested for doing a perfectly legal thing... it was their mistake.
didn't stop them treating me like shit, though. so i can say they just 'weren't fine'. didn't protect my safety, my liberty or preserve justice.
fuck tha police.
shit bulloug wrote:
bullshit
remind me which law i broke?SamTheMan wrote:
shouldnt of broke the law
Last edited by Uzique (2010-07-21 10:54:59)
well i find it funny that you get all bent out of shape at lowing about mooslims and islam yet you can lump the fuzz into "fuck tha police"Uzique wrote:
maybe i know the facts of the case and had an official apology and you... don't know jack about it?
okay dokes then. police aren't infallible, perfect guardians and upholders of the law.
they fuck up and abuse people's liberty and miscarry justice.
Last edited by Uzique (2010-07-21 11:05:10)
i didnt say you were media sheep. christ i was talking to wreckognize.Uzique wrote:
well i find it funny that you completely neglect my proper reasoning and rationale for that...
my reasons come from ethics of law-making/law-keeping and social experience of the instruments of law-enforcement.
im not following any 'media sheep'. i mentioned muslims because people clearly are affected by the media.
not exactly hard to get or follow.
How about you stop being so overly sensistive to everything? Its like you've got a persecution complex. My original remark to Hanoi Hilton wasn't meant to be any kind of sarcastic remark, but of course, you have to go and blow your top and everything out of proportion like always. You're the worst offender on this forum for slinging insults and general shit at anyone, so hush up.Uzique wrote:
seriously fucking contribute something.M.O.A.B wrote:
Aw diddums.Uzique wrote:
did you just miss the 3 pages of me writing long responses on legal principles and ethical ideals?
shut the fuck up. tired of your puerile mud-slinging shit tbh.
reported you for two posts now... ive been banned for a lot less... fuck off
More like how it sounds about ten times worse than when my uncle used to process prisoners brought in for being drunk and disorderly/drugged up.Uzique wrote:
my post addressed your little remark perfectly well...
you don't know what the experience is like because the only impressions you have is from tv and films, probably... your 'disbelief' in the "hanoi hilton" comment perfectly shows that. what do you expect it to be like - other than how i described it? and what point were you trying to make, furthermore? that you're shocked by how bad and degrading the police-process is? okay.
Its a general point. People who were drunk or drugged up were, on average, treated exactly the same. They were processed, cleaned if necessary, and put to bed in a cell. That extended to disorderly souls. Unless the perp was being particularly aggressive toward the officers he would be handled calmly and without a problem. By comparison your description seems more akin to the arrest scene in Rambo, which presents the view that the police picked you up for no reason and bunged you in a dungeon. If I recall what you originally said happened, you were wandering around the house with a knife as a result of an OD. Whether the substance was legal or not, the police can't know until they investigate it. They're not clairvoyant, and they'll react to events as they appear.Uzique wrote:
was your uncle spending the night in the cells, then? gee you make a lot of sense.
im glad he had a great time though - but after all, the topic is 'what do you think of the police?', not 'what do they think of their own job?'
btw i wasn't drunk or disorderly so don't really know why you felt the need to mention that... pointless snipe, yet again.
not sure, i dont know the detailsUzique wrote:
remind me which law i broke?SamTheMan wrote:
shouldnt of broke the law
ah yeah, i remember. innocent in custody being treated like shit for breaking... zero laws.
dude you make it sound like you were a POWUzique wrote:
my post addressed your little remark perfectly well...
you don't know what the experience is like because the only impressions you have is from tv and films, probably... your 'disbelief' in the "hanoi hilton" comment perfectly shows that. what do you expect it to be like - other than how i described it? and what point were you trying to make, furthermore? that you're shocked by how bad and degrading the police-process is? okay.
Out of interest, and I assume you don't want to go into specifics, what were the general circumstances under which you were detained? Or rather, how did the police get it wrong?Uzique wrote:
wasn't the events that happened... hahaha. as i said i got an apology so clearly their conduct was recognisably in the wrong somewhere.
which is why i used it to say that the police aren't the perfect way to implement ideal-law.