They either accept lower wages, or find other jobs. You're using the same arguments as the anti-immigrant leagues trying to kick out the Irish during the 19th century.Turquoise wrote:
And what do the people do that lose their jobs? They live off of the system. The only way to counter that is to get rid of social programs that allow that.Cybargs wrote:
Immigrants usually don't lower the standard of living, but actually increase it because they make products a lot cheaper. Think of it like Wal-Marts coming into town.Turquoise wrote:
Well, if we're gonna play that game, we'd better dismantle the social safety net completely. Time for Social Darwinism.
Right, so the market should be perfectly capable of clearing everything. If someone doesn't want to work, they should starve (or may choose to steal).Cybargs wrote:
They either accept lower wages, or find other jobs. You're using the same arguments as the anti-immigrant leagues trying to kick out the Irish during the 19th century.Turquoise wrote:
And what do the people do that lose their jobs? They live off of the system. The only way to counter that is to get rid of social programs that allow that.Cybargs wrote:
Immigrants usually don't lower the standard of living, but actually increase it because they make products a lot cheaper. Think of it like Wal-Marts coming into town.
If someone doesn't want to work that's their choice in life. Not my fault someone doesn't want to remain competitive.Turquoise wrote:
Right, so the market should be perfectly capable of clearing everything. If someone doesn't want to work, they should starve (or may choose to steal).Cybargs wrote:
They either accept lower wages, or find other jobs. You're using the same arguments as the anti-immigrant leagues trying to kick out the Irish during the 19th century.Turquoise wrote:
And what do the people do that lose their jobs? They live off of the system. The only way to counter that is to get rid of social programs that allow that.
Cybargs just stated my response.Turquoise wrote:
Those shortages would easily become surpluses in the long run. That's great to have that level of confidence, but it's partially the result of NOT having a completely open door to all immigrants.JohnG@lt wrote:
Thousands of engineers arrive from India every year due to the shortage of graduating engineers here in America. I'm not in an unaffected field at all. I'm just confident in my own abilities and know that I will succeed in life.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Fair enough. You're only worth as much as what the lowest bidder charges.Cybargs wrote:
If someone doesn't want to work that's their choice in life. Not my fault someone doesn't want to remain competitive.Turquoise wrote:
Right, so the market should be perfectly capable of clearing everything. If someone doesn't want to work, they should starve (or may choose to steal).Cybargs wrote:
They either accept lower wages, or find other jobs. You're using the same arguments as the anti-immigrant leagues trying to kick out the Irish during the 19th century.
I wish I could karma more than once...Cybargs wrote:
They either accept lower wages, or find other jobs. You're using the same arguments as the anti-immigrant leagues trying to kick out the Irish during the 19th century.Turquoise wrote:
And what do the people do that lose their jobs? They live off of the system. The only way to counter that is to get rid of social programs that allow that.Cybargs wrote:
Immigrants usually don't lower the standard of living, but actually increase it because they make products a lot cheaper. Think of it like Wal-Marts coming into town.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
You pay peanuts, you get monkeys.Turquoise wrote:
Fair enough. You're only worth as much as what the lowest bidder charges.Cybargs wrote:
If someone doesn't want to work that's their choice in life. Not my fault someone doesn't want to remain competitive.Turquoise wrote:
Right, so the market should be perfectly capable of clearing everything. If someone doesn't want to work, they should starve (or may choose to steal).
No, you're worth as much as you make yourself worth.Turquoise wrote:
Fair enough. You're only worth as much as what the lowest bidder charges.Cybargs wrote:
If someone doesn't want to work that's their choice in life. Not my fault someone doesn't want to remain competitive.Turquoise wrote:
Right, so the market should be perfectly capable of clearing everything. If someone doesn't want to work, they should starve (or may choose to steal).
Let's use me as an example against a newly minted graduate.
Me: 29 year old graduate with a 3.95 GPA, military experience in which I was a team leader, graduated from one of the top high schools in the country, many years of work experience in unrelated fields + internship within field. Minor in international business.
Them: 22 year old graduate with a 2.5 GPA (average), zero life experience.
Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-07-15 06:39:14)
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
We're all monkeys -- easily replaceable monkeys.Cybargs wrote:
You pay peanuts, you get monkeys.Turquoise wrote:
Fair enough. You're only worth as much as what the lowest bidder charges.Cybargs wrote:
If someone doesn't want to work that's their choice in life. Not my fault someone doesn't want to remain competitive.
You might be. What is it that you do for work with your economics degree?Turquoise wrote:
We're all monkeys -- easily replaceable monkeys.Cybargs wrote:
You pay peanuts, you get monkeys.Turquoise wrote:
Fair enough. You're only worth as much as what the lowest bidder charges.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
But you have to get experience somewhere. I guess if we made military service mandatory, that might work.JohnG@lt wrote:
No, you're worth as much as you make yourself worth.Turquoise wrote:
Fair enough. You're only worth as much as what the lowest bidder charges.Cybargs wrote:
If someone doesn't want to work that's their choice in life. Not my fault someone doesn't want to remain competitive.
Let's use me as an example against a newly minted graduate.
Me: 29 year old graduate with a 3.95 GPA, military experience in which I was a team leader, graduated from one of the top high schools in the country, many years of work experience in unrelated fields + internship within field. Minor in international business.
Them: 22 year old graduate with a 2.5 GPA (average), zero life experience.
There are many scottish accents, some of which are nice - You're thinking of Rab C Nesbitt.jord wrote:
Infact yeah, Scottish is pretty orrible for a chick
Fuck Israel
Thats a big assumption you're making knowing nothing about them.JohnG@lt wrote:
Them: 22 year old graduate with a 2.5 GPA (average), zero life experience.
eg The Indian engineer who worked for me, he had been working in his parents business since age 10, was comfortable working 14 hour days and picked up skills in a flash - couldn't take a 'proper' curry though.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-07-15 06:44:52)
Fuck Israel
There was nothing stopping that 22 year old from making decisions in life that would make him more desirable as a worker and a better future leader to boot. That 22 year old is nothing more than a slightly overeducated high school graduate with debt.Turquoise wrote:
But you have to get experience somewhere. I guess if we made military service mandatory, that might work.JohnG@lt wrote:
No, you're worth as much as you make yourself worth.Turquoise wrote:
Fair enough. You're only worth as much as what the lowest bidder charges.
Let's use me as an example against a newly minted graduate.
Me: 29 year old graduate with a 3.95 GPA, military experience in which I was a team leader, graduated from one of the top high schools in the country, many years of work experience in unrelated fields + internship within field. Minor in international business.
Them: 22 year old graduate with a 2.5 GPA (average), zero life experience.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
A lot of paperwork. It doesn't really use my degree, but it's a good job nonetheless.JohnG@lt wrote:
You might be. What is it that you do for work with your economics degree?Turquoise wrote:
We're all monkeys -- easily replaceable monkeys.Cybargs wrote:
You pay peanuts, you get monkeys.
Become an unpaid intern during college.Turquoise wrote:
But you have to get experience somewhere. I guess if we made military service mandatory, that might work.JohnG@lt wrote:
No, you're worth as much as you make yourself worth.Turquoise wrote:
Fair enough. You're only worth as much as what the lowest bidder charges.
Let's use me as an example against a newly minted graduate.
Me: 29 year old graduate with a 3.95 GPA, military experience in which I was a team leader, graduated from one of the top high schools in the country, many years of work experience in unrelated fields + internship within field. Minor in international business.
Them: 22 year old graduate with a 2.5 GPA (average), zero life experience.
I had a classmate in mind when I wrote that out. He's already got job offers lined up so he'll be fine.Dilbert_X wrote:
Thats a big assumption you're making knowing nothing about them.JohnG@lt wrote:
Them: 22 year old graduate with a 2.5 GPA (average), zero life experience.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Fair enough. I guess I should pick up my copy of Atlas Shrugged and read it again. Apparently, self-determination is all you need to succeed.JohnG@lt wrote:
There was nothing stopping that 22 year old from making decisions in life that would make him more desirable as a worker and a better future leader to boot. That 22 year old is nothing more than a slightly overeducated high school graduate with debt.Turquoise wrote:
But you have to get experience somewhere. I guess if we made military service mandatory, that might work.JohnG@lt wrote:
No, you're worth as much as you make yourself worth.
Let's use me as an example against a newly minted graduate.
Me: 29 year old graduate with a 3.95 GPA, military experience in which I was a team leader, graduated from one of the top high schools in the country, many years of work experience in unrelated fields + internship within field. Minor in international business.
Them: 22 year old graduate with a 2.5 GPA (average), zero life experience.
Yawn. You should move to Scandinavia. You've already got your Jantelov in place.Turquoise wrote:
Fair enough. I guess I should pick up my copy of Atlas Shrugged and read it again. Apparently, self-determination is all you need to succeed.JohnG@lt wrote:
There was nothing stopping that 22 year old from making decisions in life that would make him more desirable as a worker and a better future leader to boot. That 22 year old is nothing more than a slightly overeducated high school graduate with debt.Turquoise wrote:
But you have to get experience somewhere. I guess if we made military service mandatory, that might work.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
America is the economic super house today due to all that shit about the power of the individual and rugged individualism.Turquoise wrote:
Fair enough. I guess I should pick up my copy of Atlas Shrugged and read it again. Apparently, self-determination is all you need to succeed.JohnG@lt wrote:
There was nothing stopping that 22 year old from making decisions in life that would make him more desirable as a worker and a better future leader to boot. That 22 year old is nothing more than a slightly overeducated high school graduate with debt.Turquoise wrote:
But you have to get experience somewhere. I guess if we made military service mandatory, that might work.
Well, that and economic imperialism.Cybargs wrote:
America is the economic super house today due to all that shit about the power of the individual and rugged individualism.Turquoise wrote:
Fair enough. I guess I should pick up my copy of Atlas Shrugged and read it again. Apparently, self-determination is all you need to succeed.JohnG@lt wrote:
There was nothing stopping that 22 year old from making decisions in life that would make him more desirable as a worker and a better future leader to boot. That 22 year old is nothing more than a slightly overeducated high school graduate with debt.
Other colonial powers tried that and had more colonies. Still didn't make them as powerful as the US is today. The American ethos of individualism really did help it out during the west ward expansion, and for taking risks and shit.Turquoise wrote:
Well, that and economic imperialism.Cybargs wrote:
America is the economic super house today due to all that shit about the power of the individual and rugged individualism.Turquoise wrote:
Fair enough. I guess I should pick up my copy of Atlas Shrugged and read it again. Apparently, self-determination is all you need to succeed.
Ok, I'll give you that to a degree. Still, I would argue it had more to do with having a shitload of resources, geographical advantages (like not being next to aggressive and powerful countries), and economically expanding at the right period of time technologically speaking.Cybargs wrote:
Other colonial powers tried that and had more colonies. Still didn't make them as powerful as the US is today. The American ethos of individualism really did help it out during the west ward expansion, and for taking risks and shit.Turquoise wrote:
Well, that and economic imperialism.Cybargs wrote:
America is the economic super house today due to all that shit about the power of the individual and rugged individualism.
Can't do all that without self-determination Same as why the Puritan colonies were a lot better off than the ones in the South because of work ethic and individualism.Turquoise wrote:
Ok, I'll give you that to a degree. Still, I would argue it had more to do with having a shitload of resources, geographical advantages (like not being next to aggressive and powerful countries), and economically expanding at the right period of time technologically speaking.Cybargs wrote:
Other colonial powers tried that and had more colonies. Still didn't make them as powerful as the US is today. The American ethos of individualism really did help it out during the west ward expansion, and for taking risks and shit.Turquoise wrote:
Well, that and economic imperialism.
Well, some Southern colonies were penal (like Georgia), while others were plantation-based. Much of the labor didn't have much choice regarding "self-determination." They were already determined to be criminals or slaves.Cybargs wrote:
Can't do all that without self-determination Same as why the Puritan colonies were a lot better off than the ones in the South because of work ethic and individualism.Turquoise wrote:
Ok, I'll give you that to a degree. Still, I would argue it had more to do with having a shitload of resources, geographical advantages (like not being next to aggressive and powerful countries), and economically expanding at the right period of time technologically speaking.Cybargs wrote:
Other colonial powers tried that and had more colonies. Still didn't make them as powerful as the US is today. The American ethos of individualism really did help it out during the west ward expansion, and for taking risks and shit.