I'd be always mad if my first name was Sean. Unless my last name was Connery.War Man wrote:
You would know how I am when I'm mad.AussieReaper wrote:
You mad?War Man wrote:
You misread my post, dumbass.

I'd be always mad if my first name was Sean. Unless my last name was Connery.War Man wrote:
You would know how I am when I'm mad.AussieReaper wrote:
You mad?War Man wrote:
You misread my post, dumbass.
Well, me and you are very different people.AussieReaper wrote:
I'd be always mad if my first name was Sean. Unless my last name was Connery.War Man wrote:
You would know how I am when I'm mad.AussieReaper wrote:
You mad?
Lucky for me.-Whiteroom- wrote:
lucky for aussie.
War Man wrote:
Lucky for me.-Whiteroom- wrote:
lucky for aussie.
sure thing war dude.War Man wrote:
Lucky for me.-Whiteroom- wrote:
lucky for aussie.
War Man wrote:
Like you're entirely truthfulLaura wrote:
the first duty of every starship officer, is to the truth
War Man wrote:
-Whiteroom- wrote:
She won't respond to his PMs, he doesn't know what he did wrong.
Bilateral Anterolateral Shin splints with bone fragmenting. Was having problems with shin splints in first year, resurfaced recently much much worse, xrays showed some actual bone damage. Really the only opinion is intensive physio, custom orthotics and doing no strenuous leg activity for ~6 months. Even just walking for more than about 20m is incredibly painful.KuSTaV wrote:
How'd you injure yourself?
Last edited by Little BaBy JESUS (2011-11-06 17:58:57)
But bf2 did that whole, get quickly into the action, on say, oman, where there was heaps of different flags, and there was intense infantry fighting at them, but there was a much larger scale for the map for tank/heli/plane dogfights.Adams_BJ wrote:
Yeah, it's far too small for BF scale, but like you said it's the way gaming is going now. People want to be able to get the action quickly on foot.
You can tell that DICE is trying to listen to both sides of the spectrum to make BF3. The hardcore BF fans wanted longevity and hard to get rewards, and the new crowd likely sparklies every few seconds.
So they put in 145 ranks, so to get to the last rank will take ages, but you still rank up frequently enough to not lose interest. They put in medals that will be challenging, and ribbons that won't be.
Good compromises.
People don't want to run that far anymore. I was playing on canals today, way too small for the jets by a mile, ceiling is too low, you're on the other side of the map in 2 seconds, you never get to see anything.bakinacake wrote:
But bf2 did that whole, get quickly into the action, on say, oman, where there was heaps of different flags, and there was intense infantry fighting at them, but there was a much larger scale for the map for tank/heli/plane dogfights.Adams_BJ wrote:
Yeah, it's far too small for BF scale, but like you said it's the way gaming is going now. People want to be able to get the action quickly on foot.
You can tell that DICE is trying to listen to both sides of the spectrum to make BF3. The hardcore BF fans wanted longevity and hard to get rewards, and the new crowd likely sparklies every few seconds.
So they put in 145 ranks, so to get to the last rank will take ages, but you still rank up frequently enough to not lose interest. They put in medals that will be challenging, and ribbons that won't be.
Good compromises.
Also i am disappointed with the lazer missiles on jets, not enough damage, but then again, more people need to use the soflam.