BF2S Forums AU 2: Electric Boogaloo

AussieReaper wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Looks like the forum spambot is back.

i just read some of your dst interactions with lowing.  i think the spambot never left.

the only reason you post in this thread is cause you're too stupid to debate in those thread, so cry about how we pick on the right wingers in here.

you're a sad, strange little man. and you have my pity.

have i ever mentioned right wing in this thread?  maybe like once or twice in dunno but i doubt it.


4chan4lyfebro

AussieReaper wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Looks like the forum spambot is back.

i just read some of your dst interactions with lowing.  i think the spambot never left.

the only reason you post in this thread is cause you're too stupid to debate in those thread, so cry about how we pick on the right wingers in here.

you're a sad, strange little man. and you have my pity.

The only reason he spams is because his mental capacity doesn't carry further than a sentence or two.

fuck uni

KuSTaV wrote:

fuck uni

Up its fucking arse?

AussieReaper wrote:

I mean, sure warman will just spout his parents talking points, but atleast it's something.

usm couldn't debate his way out of a moistened brown paper bag if his arguments were fists.

ive seen your skinny little picture.  i dont think you should talk tbh.

Last edited by 11 Bravo (2011-07-26 20:03:05)

AussieReaper wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

I mean, sure warman will just spout his parents talking points, but atleast it's something.

usm couldn't debate his way out of a moistened brown paper bag if his arguments were fists.

ive seen your skinny little picture.  i dont think you should talk tbh.

see, that's the sort of thing uzique would resort to when he can't be assed to debate. but it's still his second option. for you it's the default.

it'if the first thing you jump to is "well you're skinny" , of course your skills in debate are less than that of shifty and warman. who have talking points and conviction.

you think there is debate in dst?

4chan4lyfebro

AussieReaper wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

see, that's the sort of thing uzique would resort to when he can't be assed to debate. but it's still his second option. for you it's the default.

it'if the first thing you jump to is "well you're skinny" , of course your skills in debate are less than that of shifty and warman. who have talking points and conviction.

you think there is debate in dst?

4chan4lyfebro

more than you can clearly handle.

and it seems to bother you so much that you asked us to leave the right wingers alone.

as if they can't stick up for themselves. maybe if you contributed something to those threads rather than cried about them here you'd realise they don't need you're white knighting. they might think it's sweet though. i dunno.

i never asked you to leave anyone alone.  i just find it annoying because its just constant in every single thread.  like you find me annoying in this thread.  so much so you threatened to leave this forum if i didnt leave.

11 Bravo wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

you think there is debate in dst?

4chan4lyfebro

more than you can clearly handle.

and it seems to bother you so much that you asked us to leave the right wingers alone.

as if they can't stick up for themselves. maybe if you contributed something to those threads rather than cried about them here you'd realise they don't need you're white knighting. they might think it's sweet though. i dunno.

i never asked you to leave anyone alone.  i just find it annoying because its just constant in every single thread.  like you find me annoying in this thread.  so much so you threatened to leave this forum if i didnt leave.

so, you find it anoying because we debate with the right wingers in the debate and serious talk section?

yes that's what I've been saying. Then you come in here with your wah wah QQ I can't handle you guys being mean! attitude.

Thanks for proving the point. And also proving the point your debate skills are less than that of a mouldy potato.

AussieReaper wrote:

War Man wrote:

That's right, I forgot to add "No personal insult or attack intended."

Sorry Aussies, didn't intend to have any personal insult or attack on ya.

Appology accepted.

Can you forgiven me for being a fool in love?

Yes of course, no homo though.

your*

11 Bravo wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

I might believe you if this wasn't you who mentioned dst and how jaekus should stop picking on poor lowing

11 Bravo wrote:

i just read some of your dst interactions with lowing.  i think the spambot never left.

cause lowing really needs you're protection

i never said stop picking on lowing.  keep making stuff up.  simple fact is me being in this thread pisses you off and thats just the facts, jack.  and your AU mod buddy cant do a damn thing about it like before and that pisses you off even more.

clearly you did come in here to complain about jaekus debating lowing and it just pisses you off that the grown ups are talking in dst and you can't offer your own 2c cause you're too imbecilic to draft a response. your only recourse is to have a wah wah qq session in this thread cause you'll get a reply or can act big and tough and defend warman/shifty as if they need a wet nurse and you're the guy to step in and pitch for them.

the sad thing is, warman already debates above your standard, and shifty isn't far off!

well why have a whinge about what we do and say in dst if it doesnt cause you to rage and reach for the spam button?

maybe if you contributed anywhere in dst I wouldn't think this. but, you don't. So, I do.

is there anyone else you want jeakus to stop picking on?

we've got lowing, shifty and warman on the list. but im sure there's others that need your protection.