ATG
Banned
+5,233|6814|Global Command

Turquoise wrote:

As a side note, I know it's probably strange to hear me side with a neocon argument.
Well, actually...
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6866|the dank(super) side of Oregon
The only way to change peoples thoughts, in this case, nutty muslim thoughts, is to make them less poor.  When you wipe your ass with your left hand, waging jihad and blowing yourself up is a fairly appealing prospect.  Give them TP and a little air conditioning and all the sudden Bin Laden isn't such a magnetic figure.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6696|'Murka

Reciprocity wrote:

The only way to change peoples thoughts, in this case, nutty muslim thoughts, is to make them less poor.  When you wipe your ass with your left hand, waging jihad and blowing yourself up is a fairly appealing prospect.  Give them TP and a little air conditioning and all the sudden Bin Laden isn't such a magnetic figure.
Perhaps they should talk to their own national leadership about that "giving" part?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Reciprocity wrote:

The only way to change peoples thoughts, in this case, nutty muslim thoughts, is to make them less poor.  When you wipe your ass with your left hand, waging jihad and blowing yourself up is a fairly appealing prospect.  Give them TP and a little air conditioning and all the sudden Bin Laden isn't such a magnetic figure.
No no and no. Saudi Arabia and Iran have these amenities and it doesn't stop them from spawning nutjobs. Osama Bin Laden was a fucking prince for christsakes.

That's the exact same mentality that created welfare in America and spawned the massive underclass we currently have. You can't buy off the poor and make them behave.

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-06-24 22:30:31)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6866|the dank(super) side of Oregon

FEOS wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

The only way to change peoples thoughts, in this case, nutty muslim thoughts, is to make them less poor.  When you wipe your ass with your left hand, waging jihad and blowing yourself up is a fairly appealing prospect.  Give them TP and a little air conditioning and all the sudden Bin Laden isn't such a magnetic figure.
Perhaps they should talk to their own national leadership about that "giving" part?
I'm not saying "we" give them anything.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

It's not, remember our PMs from months back?
True....  lol...

JohnG@lt wrote:

How can you identify which opinions lead to murderous intent? How can you identify those who just mouth the words without meaning them? How can you identify someone who is about to hop on a plane and fly it into a pair of skyscrapers?
Intel...  We have intelligence agencies for a good reason.  Obviously, they can still fuck up, but they tend to be good at what they do.

JohnG@lt wrote:

There isn't a machine in the world that can read minds or discern intent. You're advocating the 'Let god sort them out' approach and... man, that shit is just wrong.
Let god sort them out only comes into play when collateral damage is mostly unavoidable.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

It's not, remember our PMs from months back?
True....  lol...

JohnG@lt wrote:

How can you identify which opinions lead to murderous intent? How can you identify those who just mouth the words without meaning them? How can you identify someone who is about to hop on a plane and fly it into a pair of skyscrapers?
Intel...  We have intelligence agencies for a good reason.  Obviously, they can still fuck up, but they tend to be good at what they do.

JohnG@lt wrote:

There isn't a machine in the world that can read minds or discern intent. You're advocating the 'Let god sort them out' approach and... man, that shit is just wrong.
Let god sort them out only comes into play when collateral damage is mostly unavoidable.
Well, since you clearly advocated genocide in this very thread... that's a lot of collateral damage...
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

Reciprocity wrote:

The only way to change peoples thoughts, in this case, nutty muslim thoughts, is to make them less poor.  When you wipe your ass with your left hand, waging jihad and blowing yourself up is a fairly appealing prospect.  Give them TP and a little air conditioning and all the sudden Bin Laden isn't such a magnetic figure.
Well, oil wealth is accomplishing some of that.  The UAE actually is progressing.  There are other countries like Jordan that are as well.

I'm not saying all Islamic countries are the same.  Clearly, some are showing great potential, but others are just stuck in the Stone Age with no sign of improvement.  Afghanistan is one of them.   Pakistan's more remote regions are the same.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

It's not, remember our PMs from months back?
True....  lol...

JohnG@lt wrote:

How can you identify which opinions lead to murderous intent? How can you identify those who just mouth the words without meaning them? How can you identify someone who is about to hop on a plane and fly it into a pair of skyscrapers?
Intel...  We have intelligence agencies for a good reason.  Obviously, they can still fuck up, but they tend to be good at what they do.

JohnG@lt wrote:

There isn't a machine in the world that can read minds or discern intent. You're advocating the 'Let god sort them out' approach and... man, that shit is just wrong.
Let god sort them out only comes into play when collateral damage is mostly unavoidable.
Well, since you clearly advocated genocide in this very thread... that's a lot of collateral damage...
There would be in Afghanistan and in the bordering areas of Pakistan.  Depending on how neighboring people would react, there potentially could be a lot more than that as well.

It all depends...
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

It's not, remember our PMs from months back?
True....  lol...

JohnG@lt wrote:

How can you identify which opinions lead to murderous intent? How can you identify those who just mouth the words without meaning them? How can you identify someone who is about to hop on a plane and fly it into a pair of skyscrapers?
Intel...  We have intelligence agencies for a good reason.  Obviously, they can still fuck up, but they tend to be good at what they do.


Let god sort them out only comes into play when collateral damage is mostly unavoidable.
Well, since you clearly advocated genocide in this very thread... that's a lot of collateral damage...
There would be in Afghanistan and in the bordering areas of Pakistan.  Depending on how neighboring people would react, there potentially could be a lot more than that as well.

It all depends...
I'm honestly at a loss for words.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

The only way to change peoples thoughts, in this case, nutty muslim thoughts, is to make them less poor.  When you wipe your ass with your left hand, waging jihad and blowing yourself up is a fairly appealing prospect.  Give them TP and a little air conditioning and all the sudden Bin Laden isn't such a magnetic figure.
No no and no. Saudi Arabia and Iran have these amenities and it doesn't stop them from spawning nutjobs. Osama Bin Laden was a fucking prince for christsakes.

That's the exact same mentality that created welfare in America and spawned the massive underclass we currently have. You can't buy off the poor and make them behave.
I think he's referring to job creation.  That can be accomplished via the private sector or the public one.

When considering that many of these countries operate with nationalized oil companies, that gives their governments the power to use the money to create jobs.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

The only way to change peoples thoughts, in this case, nutty muslim thoughts, is to make them less poor.  When you wipe your ass with your left hand, waging jihad and blowing yourself up is a fairly appealing prospect.  Give them TP and a little air conditioning and all the sudden Bin Laden isn't such a magnetic figure.
No no and no. Saudi Arabia and Iran have these amenities and it doesn't stop them from spawning nutjobs. Osama Bin Laden was a fucking prince for christsakes.

That's the exact same mentality that created welfare in America and spawned the massive underclass we currently have. You can't buy off the poor and make them behave.
I think he's referring to job creation.  That can be accomplished via the private sector or the public one.

When considering that many of these countries operate with nationalized oil companies, that gives their governments the power to use the money to create jobs.
No, it gives their politicians a large piggy bank
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


No no and no. Saudi Arabia and Iran have these amenities and it doesn't stop them from spawning nutjobs. Osama Bin Laden was a fucking prince for christsakes.

That's the exact same mentality that created welfare in America and spawned the massive underclass we currently have. You can't buy off the poor and make them behave.
I think he's referring to job creation.  That can be accomplished via the private sector or the public one.

When considering that many of these countries operate with nationalized oil companies, that gives their governments the power to use the money to create jobs.
No, it gives their politicians a large piggy bank
In practice, that's what typically happens, but if their governments weren't so goddamn corrupt....
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6866|the dank(super) side of Oregon

JohnG@lt wrote:

No no and no. Saudi Arabia and Iran have these amenities and it doesn't stop them from spawning nutjobs. Osama Bin Laden was a fucking prince for christsakes.
There are plenty of slums in Saudi Arabia and Iran.  Poverty breeds extremism.  Bin laden isn't a martyr or jihadi, al Zawahiri isn't a martyr or jihadi. 


That's the exact same mentality that created welfare in America and spawned the massive underclass we currently have. You can't buy off the poor and make them behave.
It's not about buying off people.  Some afghan rock farmer would cut off his mom's head to live like the poor in this country.

Last edited by Reciprocity (2010-06-24 22:42:17)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Well, since you clearly advocated genocide in this very thread... that's a lot of collateral damage...
There would be in Afghanistan and in the bordering areas of Pakistan.  Depending on how neighboring people would react, there potentially could be a lot more than that as well.

It all depends...
I'm honestly at a loss for words.
I don't follow conventional morality, especially when concerning an unconventional war.  Depending on the situation, sometimes a lot of death is nothing short of necessary.  You can't save everyone.  Sometimes the best protection for the rest of the human population is to remove a certain section of it.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Reciprocity wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

No no and no. Saudi Arabia and Iran have these amenities and it doesn't stop them from spawning nutjobs. Osama Bin Laden was a fucking prince for christsakes.

There are plenty of slums in Saudi Arabia and Iran.  Poverty breeds extremism.  Bin laden isn't a martyr, al Zawahiri isn't a martyr. 


That's the exact same mentality that created welfare in America and spawned the massive underclass we currently have. You can't buy off the poor and make them behave.
It's not about buying off people.  Some afghan rock farmer would cut off his mom's head to live like the poor in this country.
So what is stopping him from attaining our level of wealth? Nothing. They have natural resources, they have cheap labor, they could be taking the path that China has taken. Why haven't they?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

I think he's referring to job creation.  That can be accomplished via the private sector or the public one.

When considering that many of these countries operate with nationalized oil companies, that gives their governments the power to use the money to create jobs.
No, it gives their politicians a large piggy bank
In practice, that's what typically happens, but if their governments weren't so goddamn corrupt....
Wishes and whims are not facts nor are they a means to discover them.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

No no and no. Saudi Arabia and Iran have these amenities and it doesn't stop them from spawning nutjobs. Osama Bin Laden was a fucking prince for christsakes.

There are plenty of slums in Saudi Arabia and Iran.  Poverty breeds extremism.  Bin laden isn't a martyr, al Zawahiri isn't a martyr. 


That's the exact same mentality that created welfare in America and spawned the massive underclass we currently have. You can't buy off the poor and make them behave.
It's not about buying off people.  Some afghan rock farmer would cut off his mom's head to live like the poor in this country.
So what is stopping him from attaining our level of wealth? Nothing. They have natural resources, they have cheap labor, they could be taking the path that China has taken. Why haven't they?
Culture and a lack of education.

Surely, you realize that Afghanistan is nowhere near as functional in a cultural sense as China is.  China is a far more advanced country, even when considering its poverty.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


No, it gives their politicians a large piggy bank
In practice, that's what typically happens, but if their governments weren't so goddamn corrupt....
Wishes and whims are not facts nor are they a means to discover them.
....neither is rigid dogma or ideology.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:


It's not about buying off people.  Some afghan rock farmer would cut off his mom's head to live like the poor in this country.
So what is stopping him from attaining our level of wealth? Nothing. They have natural resources, they have cheap labor, they could be taking the path that China has taken. Why haven't they?
Culture and a lack of education.

Surely, you realize that Afghanistan is nowhere near as functional in a cultural sense as China is.  China is a far more advanced country, even when considering its poverty.
Why is that my problem? Why should I, as Reciprocity seems to want, be on the hook to pay for their TVs and cars and satellite radios?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


So what is stopping him from attaining our level of wealth? Nothing. They have natural resources, they have cheap labor, they could be taking the path that China has taken. Why haven't they?
Culture and a lack of education.

Surely, you realize that Afghanistan is nowhere near as functional in a cultural sense as China is.  China is a far more advanced country, even when considering its poverty.
Why is that my problem? Why should I, as Reciprocity seems to want, be on the hook to pay for their TVs and cars and satellite radios?
Judging by another post above, that's not what he's suggesting.  I believe he's referring to their own governments doing that, although we can always motivate these governments to do more of this by putting pressure on them.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6866|the dank(super) side of Oregon

JohnG@lt wrote:

Why should I, as Reciprocity seems to want, be on the hook to pay for their TVs and cars and satellite radios?
I didn't suggest that at all.  All I said was abject poverty breeds extremism.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Culture and a lack of education.

Surely, you realize that Afghanistan is nowhere near as functional in a cultural sense as China is.  China is a far more advanced country, even when considering its poverty.
Why is that my problem? Why should I, as Reciprocity seems to want, be on the hook to pay for their TVs and cars and satellite radios?
Judging by another post above, that's not what he's suggesting.  I believe he's referring to their own governments doing that, although we can always motivate these governments to do more of this by putting pressure on them.
Newp. It has to come from the people themselves. Wealth creation can not be dictated from on high. This is where the Soviets failed and where Chavez is currently failing rather spectacularly.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

In practice, that's what typically happens, but if their governments weren't so goddamn corrupt....
Wishes and whims are not facts nor are they a means to discover them.
....neither is rigid dogma or ideology.
I'm hardly rigid... just consistent
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England
And with that I am off to bed, tootles!
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard