With the new Nvidia drivers, it supports full GPU acceleration._j5689_ wrote:
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
Tweakguides.com description:
This is a major update which contains performance and video improvements, multi-touch enhancements and adherence to browser privacy mode settings.
liq, try downloading it via this method, there's no need for that Adobe DLM junk.liquidat0r wrote:
Installation failed.
oh well.
Last edited by alexb (2010-06-13 09:14:40)
No, I got the same problem, you have to like restart once or twice or something so it can I think uninstall 10 and then reinstall 10.1. It was confusing me tooliquidat0r wrote:
Installation failed.
oh well.
Took me literally 10 seconds from clicking the link till install complete. Thanksalexb wrote:
liq, try downloading it via this method, there's no need for that Adobe DLM junk.liquidat0r wrote:
Installation failed.
oh well.
http://filehippo.com/download_flashplayer/
Appleinsider wrote:_j5689_ wrote:
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
Tweakguides.com description:
This is a major update which contains performance and video improvements, multi-touch enhancements and adherence to browser privacy mode settings.
However, Adobe says this (privacy) feature is not supported for Opera or Safari, meaning that Flash content won't respect users' private browsing preferences.
Another abysmal attempt at by Adobe..The new Flash Player 10.1 release doesn't yet include official support for hardware video acceleration, a new feature Apple just enabled Adobe to provide with new Mac OS X APIs.
mcminty wrote:
Appleinsider wrote:However, Adobe says this (privacy) feature is not supported for Opera or Safari, meaning that Flash content won't respect users' private browsing preferences.Another abysmal attempt at by Adobe..The new Flash Player 10.1 release doesn't yet include official support for hardware video acceleration, a new feature Apple just enabled Adobe to provide with new Mac OS X APIs.
Last edited by Brasso (2010-06-13 18:46:07)
Offloading CPU usage onto GPU usage for video + fixes = good.Brasso wrote:
i must be the only one that doesnt care?
what's the big deal?
Last edited by alexb (2010-06-13 19:00:46)
Even if Apple only recently let them use those particular APIs.. windows flash was previously fine without hardware acceleration. For me, one simple youtube video will often utilise 80-90+% of the CPU.. and it's a 2.66GHz core 2 duo.alexb wrote:
mcminty wrote:
Appleinsider wrote:However, Adobe says this (privacy) feature is not supported for Opera or Safari, meaning that Flash content won't respect users' private browsing preferences.Another abysmal attempt at by Adobe..The new Flash Player 10.1 release doesn't yet include official support for hardware video acceleration, a new feature Apple just enabled Adobe to provide with new Mac OS X APIs.
Actually you can download the redist straight from Adobe:alexb wrote:
liq, try downloading it via this method, there's no need for that Adobe DLM junk.liquidat0r wrote:
Installation failed.
oh well.
http://filehippo.com/download_flashplayer/
apt-gtfoSydney wrote:
Hurray, worked perfectly with a apt-get update.
So if the new version utilises more of the GPU, any idea what CPU usage would be now?mcminty wrote:
Even if Apple only recently let them use those particular APIs.. windows flash was previously fine without hardware acceleration. For me, one simple youtube video will often utilise 80-90+% of the CPU.. and it's a 2.66GHz core 2 duo.alexb wrote:
mcminty wrote:
Appleinsider wrote:Another abysmal attempt at by Adobe..However, Adobe says this (privacy) feature is not supported for Opera or Safari, meaning that Flash content won't respect users' private browsing preferences.
Less.Jaekus wrote:
So if the new version utilises more of the GPU, any idea what CPU usage would be now?mcminty wrote:
Even if Apple only recently let them use those particular APIs.. windows flash was previously fine without hardware acceleration. For me, one simple youtube video will often utilise 80-90+% of the CPU.. and it's a 2.66GHz core 2 duo.alexb wrote:
Clearly, but any idea percentile-wise?Finray wrote:
Less.Jaekus wrote:
So if the new version utilises more of the GPU, any idea what CPU usage would be now?mcminty wrote:
Even if Apple only recently let them use those particular APIs.. windows flash was previously fine without hardware acceleration. For me, one simple youtube video will often utilise 80-90+% of the CPU.. and it's a 2.66GHz core 2 duo.
...Jaekus wrote:
So if the new version utilises more of the GPU, any idea what CPU usage would be now?mcminty wrote:
Even if Apple only recently let them use those particular APIs.. windows flash was previously fine without hardware acceleration. For me, one simple youtube video will often utilise 80-90+% of the CPU.. and it's a 2.66GHz core 2 duo.alexb wrote:
mcminty wrote:
The new Flash Player 10.1 release doesn't yet include official support for hardware video acceleration, a new feature Apple just enabled Adobe to provide with new Mac OS X APIs.
mcminty wrote:
Another abysmal attempt at by Adobe..
Thats got to be a problem on your end. I've never seen it go more than 10% above regular levels from youtubemcminty wrote:
Even if Apple only recently let them use those particular APIs.. windows flash was previously fine without hardware acceleration. For me, one simple youtube video will often utilise 80-90+% of the CPU.. and it's a 2.66GHz core 2 duo.
Roll on HTML 5, eh...mcminty wrote:
It's a problem with Flash and OS X, cause Adobe can't give a fuck about non-windows operating systems. The symptoms I described with reference to flash videos is not restricted to me. It's a common experience.. just google it. Whether Apple had or hadn't previously given Adobe access to those APIs isn't the point - windows has had a stable version that doesn't require hardware acceleration for years.