Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites

2010-06-15 00:24:26

#26

rdx-fx: ...; +955|6881

rdx-fx wrote:
Saudi Arabia is our ally, but they are no-one's friend.

Turquoise wrote:
Agreed, although the same is true of Israel and Pakistan.

Have I mentioned my dislike for the Pakistani ISI lately?

Something along the lines of "If the Pakistanis know a secret, it may as well be in the front page of the New York Times"

Spy riddled, insecure, corrupt pile of steaming pig excrement.

2010-06-15 02:19:40

#27

krazed: Admiral of the Bathtub; +619|7070|Great Brown North

it was more like if Pakistani intelligence know about it, it may as well be on ebay

2010-06-15 06:01:32

#28

LostFate: Same shit, Different Arsehole; +95|6775|England

AussieReaper wrote:
Catbox wrote:
I guess Saudi Arabia is also afraid of Ahmadinejad?
So are most Iranians.

An You know this how? the news?

2010-06-15 06:07:29

#29

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6911|London, England

You really think that Iranians would welcome Israeli and American jets (supported by Saudi's) in return for getting rid of Ajod? Yeah there's probably alot of liberals in Iran that hate the current neocon regime and such, but I'm sure they'd want to do it themselves rather than have Israel/USA/Saudi Arabia help them, if you get what I'm saying.

It would be like the neocons of the US asking Russia to help them oust Obama or some shit. Shit aint gonna happen no matter how much they hate him.

And it would only cement the hardliners in Saudi even more if they grant an air corridor to Israel of all countries to attack Iran. There's hardly any good that would come out of this IMO

2010-06-15 06:10:47

#30

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,817|6396|eXtreme to the maX

Mek wrote:
It would be like the neocons of the US asking Russia to help them oust Obama or some shit. Shit aint gonna happen no matter how much they hate him.

The neocons were doing deals with the Iranians to further their nefarious aims not that long ago.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair

Pretty sure they'd do a deal with the Russians.

wiki wrote:
According to The New York Times, the United States supplied the following arms to Iran (via Israel )

August 20, 1985. 96 TOW anti-tank missiles
September 14, 1985. 408 more TOWs
November 24, 1985. 18 Hawk anti-aircraft missiles
February 17, 1986. 500 TOWs
February 27, 1986. 500 TOWs
May 24, 1986. 508 TOWs, 240 Hawk spare parts
August 4, 1986. More Hawk spares
October 28, 1986. 500 TOWs

Iran has reverse engineered and currently manufactures duplicate TOW missiles. These carry the Iranian designation of Toophan.

Wonder if thats where they got the expertise in explosively formed projectiles - now thats a bit of blowback for you.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-06-15 06:27:11)

Fuck Israel

2010-06-15 06:10:53

#31

nlsme1: Member; +32|5707

http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/a … ter_enemy/

Things are really getting warmed up.

2010-06-15 11:23:22

#32

M.O.A.B: 'Light 'em up!'; +1,220|6513|Escea

nlsme1 wrote:
http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2010/06/15/iran_cleric_wants_special_weapons_to_deter_enemy/

Things are really getting warmed up.

He must've missed the 'Its a secret' meeting.

2010-06-15 16:27:45

#33

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6695|North Carolina

rdx-fx wrote:
rdx-fx wrote:
Saudi Arabia is our ally, but they are no-one's friend.
Turquoise wrote:
Agreed, although the same is true of Israel and Pakistan.
Have I mentioned my dislike for the Pakistani ISI lately?

Something along the lines of "If the Pakistanis know a secret, it may as well be in the front page of the New York Times"

Spy riddled, insecure, corrupt pile of steaming pig excrement.

Yeah, the ISI is full of shit.

2010-06-15 16:38:44

#34

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,817|6396|eXtreme to the maX

Oh and the CIA are better?
Your freedom fighter is my terrorist, and vice versa.

Fuck Israel

2010-06-15 16:46:39

#35

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6695|North Carolina

Dilbert_X wrote:
Oh and the CIA are better?
Your freedom fighter is my terrorist, and vice versa.

Well, the difference is that we don't have Islamic extremists in our ranks. I'm not saying the CIA is squeaky clean, but they are nowhere near as corrupt as the ISI.

Granted, Pakistan overall is one of the most corrupt nations on the planet.

2010-06-15 17:02:42

#36

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,817|6396|eXtreme to the maX

Depends on what you mean by corrupt I guess, and whether they are just following corrupt orders from the govt or acting on their own.

Fuck Israel

2010-06-15 21:10:25

#37

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6695|North Carolina

Dilbert_X wrote:
Depends on what you mean by corrupt I guess, and whether they are just following corrupt orders from the govt or acting on their own.

Well, Pakistan does perennially rank very badly on the corruption index.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption … ions_Index

(139 out of 180) the higher the number, the worse

2010-06-15 21:16:05

#38

rdx-fx: ...; +955|6881

Dilbert_X wrote:
Depends on what you mean by corrupt I guess, and whether they are just following corrupt orders from the govt or acting on their own.

I wouldn't be surprised if the ISI had more foreign spies than actual legitimate agents in it's middle ranks...

And I'm only mostly joking when I say that.

Also, about 95% of the money the CIA funneled through the ISI in the 1970's and 1980's, went to the exact wrong people.

2010-06-15 21:17:58

#39

Reciprocity: Member; +721|6871|the dank(super) side of Oregon

I'll take western corruption over 3rd world corruption any day.

Last edited by Reciprocity (2010-06-15 21:18:31)

2010-06-16 02:04:02

#40

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,057|7062|PNW

ATG wrote:
Yes, we stand on the brink of WW3.

Time to hug your kids and make your peace with God because the shit is hitting the fan.

The minute the Soviets deliver the next generation of air defense to Iran the bombs start falling.
That will be the kick off.

North Korea will attack America and South Korea. China will take Siberia and Taiwan. The U.S. will nuke Hugo.

And then it will get ugly.

wat.

2010-06-16 04:00:21

#41

Dr.PhiL: Danmark; +30|6960|Up North

unnamednewbie13 wrote:
ATG wrote:
Yes, we stand on the brink of WW3.

Time to hug your kids and make your peace with God because the shit is hitting the fan.

The minute the Soviets deliver the next generation of air defense to Iran the bombs start falling.
That will be the kick off.

North Korea will attack America and South Korea. China will take Siberia and Taiwan. The U.S. will nuke Hugo.

And then it will get ugly.
wat.

From what I could read in the newspaper it seem's that Medvev said that iranians won't get those S-300 missiles because of the new sanctions.

2010-06-16 04:02:33

#42

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6965|Canberra, AUS

unnamednewbie13 wrote:
ATG wrote:
Yes, we stand on the brink of WW3.

Time to hug your kids and make your peace with God because the shit is hitting the fan.

The minute the Soviets deliver the next generation of air defense to Iran the bombs start falling.
That will be the kick off.

North Korea will attack America and South Korea. China will take Siberia and Taiwan. The U.S. will nuke Hugo.

And then it will get ugly.
wat.

I second that.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2010-06-16 06:05:13

#43

M.O.A.B: 'Light 'em up!'; +1,220|6513|Escea

Dilbert_X wrote:
Oh and the CIA are better?

Compared to the ISI? Much.

BF2S Forums Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites

rdx-fx wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Catbox wrote:

Mek wrote:

wiki wrote:

nlsme1 wrote:

rdx-fx wrote:

rdx-fx wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

ATG wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

ATG wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

ATG wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Board footer