Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6556|San Diego, CA, USA
Obama suggests value-added tax may be an option

(via http://www.drudgereport.com/ )

https://img145.imageshack.us/img145/9489/capt591f4f4a0bbd4ec698b.jpg

Yahoo News wrote:

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama suggested Wednesday that a new value-added tax on Americans is still on the table, seeming to show more openness to the idea than his aides have expressed in recent days.

Before deciding what revenue options are best for dealing with the deficit and the economy, Obama said in an interview with CNBC, "I want to get a better picture of what our options are."

After Obama adviser Paul Volcker recently raised the prospect of a value-added tax, or VAT, the Senate voted 85-13 last week for a nonbinding "sense of the Senate" resolution that calls the such a tax "a massive tax increase that will cripple families on fixed income and only further push back America's economic recovery."

For days, White House spokesmen have said the president has not proposed and is not considering a VAT.

"I think I directly answered this the other day by saying that it wasn't something that the president had under consideration," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters shortly before Obama spoke with CNBC.

After the interview, White House deputy communications director Jen Psaki said nothing has changed and the White House is "not considering" a VAT.
Really...that's hard to believe.  I bet Obama would try after the election in November before the next Congress is seated.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6658|USA
Boy, never saw that coming

Fuckin' socialists
Diesel_dyk
Object in mirror will feel larger than it appears
+178|6001|Truthistan

lowing wrote:

Boy, never saw that coming

Fuckin' socialists
Its not the socialists, the vat is supposed to harm the middle class and the poor, its a regressive tax.

no, this push for the vat is going to come from the wall street elite who want a perpetual bailout for their crooked schemes.
They cause us to go into debt bailing them out, and their crooked schemes destroy the tax base by tanking the real economy.



Watch for the push for the vat and perhaps carbon credit trading to come on the heals of a revenue crunch.... look for that to happen just before the november 2010 elections... what's going to happen is some bond rating agency (probably backed by Goldman Sachs) will tell the government to raise revenue or it will lower the credit rating and cause havoc on govt bonds. What happened in Greece was a prelude to what's going to occur here. We will get another Oct 2008 pearl harbor from wall street this year unless substantial reform is passed....



And you should know that being a greedy a$$hole crosses party lines... GS gives to everyone... watch for large beneficiaries for GS money to do the heavy pushing when the time comes.... I would also look at those politicans on both sides who were in the middle of the Oct 2008 BS who made surprise annoucements that they aren't running in 2010, they are going to screw us and quit. --> probably to collect their reward

Last edited by Diesel_dyk (2010-04-21 19:10:43)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6658|USA

Diesel_dyk wrote:

lowing wrote:

Boy, never saw that coming

Fuckin' socialists
Its not the socialists, the vat is supposed to harm the middle class and the poor, its a regressive tax.

no, this push for the vat is going to come from the wall street elite who want a perpetual bailout for their crooked schemes.
They cause us to go into debt bailing them out, and their crooked schemes destroy the tax base by tanking the real economy.



Watch for the push for the vat and perhaps carbon credit trading to come on the heals of a revenue crunch.... look for that to happen just before the november 2010 elections... what's going to happen is some bond rating agency (probably backed by Goldman Sachs) will tell the government to raise revenue or it will lower the credit rating and cause havoc on govt bonds. What happened in Greece was a prelude to what's going to occur here. We will get another Oct 2008 pearl harbor from wall street this year unless substantial reform is passed....



And you should know that being a greedy a$$hole crosses party lines... GS gives to everyone... watch for large beneficiaries for GS money to do the heavy pushing when the time comes.... I would also look at those politicans on both sides who were in the middle of the Oct 2008 BS who made surprise annoucements that they aren't running in 2010, they are going to screw us and quit. --> probably to collect their reward
The VAT is just another way to raise taxes to pay for Obamas socialist, entitlement agenda.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6412|North Carolina
A VAT isn't a bad thing....



...if it also involves a decrease in the income tax (or the end of payroll taxes).

Last edited by Turquoise (2010-04-21 19:34:52)

Marlo Stanfield
online poker tax cheating
+122|5170

Diesel_dyk wrote:

no, this push for the vat is going to come from the wall street elite who want a perpetual bailout for their crooked schemes.
I'm convinced you have absolutely no idea what the hell you are talking about 95% of the time so you write out long paragraphs to disguise this fact. The one line is of the same conspiracy theorist crap logic that the government did 9/11 to get Iraqi oil.

FFS
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6658|USA

Turquoise wrote:

A VAT isn't a bad thing....



...if it also involves a decrease in the income tax (or the end of payroll taxes).
you know damn well that is not what they are talking about.

The VAT will be added to the taxes we already are forced to endure.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6412|North Carolina

Marlo Stanfield wrote:

Diesel_dyk wrote:

no, this push for the vat is going to come from the wall street elite who want a perpetual bailout for their crooked schemes.
I'm convinced you have absolutely no idea what the hell you are talking about 95% of the time so you write out long paragraphs to disguise this fact. The one line is of the same conspiracy theorist crap logic that the government did 9/11 to get Iraqi oil.

FFS
Well, it does make sense from the perspective of what's happened ever since the 80s...

We dramatically decreased the tax burden on the wealthy, while not adjusting tax brackets or the AMT enough to keep up with inflation.

Of course, with our system of deductions being so wide open, this is why the wealthy rarely ever pay much more than their AMT.

Implementing a VAT without adjusting income taxes or payroll taxes accordingly would have a net negative effect on the poor and the working class.  As for how this relates to Wall Street...  well, we did just throw a ton of money at them.

If you or I go bankrupt, we file for it and start over.  If a big bank does...  they get propped up by the government.

People are so worried about socialism, but in reality, even Obama is a corporatist.  The only difference between him and the GOP when it comes to macroeconomics is that he favors the banks, while the GOP favors oil companies and the military industrial complex.

If Obama was a socialist, he would've nationalized banking -- not bailed it out.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6412|North Carolina

lowing wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

A VAT isn't a bad thing....



...if it also involves a decrease in the income tax (or the end of payroll taxes).
you know damn well that is not what they are talking about.

The VAT will be added to the taxes we already are forced to endure.
The odds are surely against what I mentioned, but it would be nice, wouldn't it?...

Then again, Obama does occasionally surprise me.  Every once in a while, he'll throw something out there that is very uncharacteristic of the image that is being formed about him.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6779|PNW

Turquoise wrote:

A VAT isn't a bad thing....



...if it also involves a decrease in the income tax (or the end of payroll taxes).
You know they wouldn't want that.
Marlo Stanfield
online poker tax cheating
+122|5170
The Native Americans would be happy as hell if this passed. Jew overlords pff Native American tax haven reservation overlords would run retail.
SealXo
Member
+309|6543
VAT? in MY America?

well see about that
Marlo Stanfield
online poker tax cheating
+122|5170
You'll stop making your lease payments and drop out of highschool to fight the man?
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6779|PNW

Marlo Stanfield wrote:

You'll stop making your lease payments and drop out of highschool to fight the man?
https://mimg.ugo.com/200904/9320/black_dynamite-2.jpg
He would.
Marlo Stanfield
online poker tax cheating
+122|5170

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Marlo Stanfield wrote:

You'll stop making your lease payments and drop out of highschool to fight the man?
http://mimg.ugo.com/200904/9320/black_dynamite-2.jpg
He would.
He'll need some help from
https://neuromancer.freeblog.hu/Files/blaxploitation/cleopatra_jones_poster.jpg
Diesel_dyk
Object in mirror will feel larger than it appears
+178|6001|Truthistan

Marlo Stanfield wrote:

Diesel_dyk wrote:

no, this push for the vat is going to come from the wall street elite who want a perpetual bailout for their crooked schemes.
I'm convinced you have absolutely no idea what the hell you are talking about 95% of the time so you write out long paragraphs to disguise this fact. The one line is of the same conspiracy theorist crap logic that the government did 9/11 to get Iraqi oil.

FFS
What good is having a brain if you are not going to use to try and predict what is about to occur... anyone can sit around and talk and analyse things that have already happened.

Look at this post 2 years 4 months ago, so that's January 2008, http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=85963&p=3 read that and tell me I don't know what I'm talking about.

So I'll keep writing about this shit and may be people will be able to see the build up to this crash before it happens and maybe it could save them from some loses.... at least no one around here will be able to say "/facepalm didn't see that one coming, that was unpredictable"

But since you think its just crap I take you through the baby steps. And while what I write may sound like a conspiracy, greed isnever a conspiracy, its a motive, and its actaully a logical conclusion

I could see the 2008 downfall about a year before it happened. Anyone capable of rational thought could see it coming. Everyone could see that the regulatory reigns came off after 9/11 to save us ffrom recession.... its kind of funny to think of the Iraq war was not the war of soldier charging on the battle field but was the war that was fought by women at the mall charging their credit cars to hilt with money they took from their equity in their homes. It's been a daisy chain of bubbles that has turned into a awfully painful set of anal beads for the taxpayers. The only thing I didn't think about was that certain large financial institutions would position themselves in expectation of the crash so that they could reap huge profits, its obvious now that paulson co. saw it coming and made billions and so did Goldman.... these companies didn't make the bubbles, excessive retirement money in the market did that, and loose federal reserve money did that too... and low margin rates multiplied the excess liquidity. Just imagine how much worse it would have been in W. got his way and all the Social security money would have started to flood into the market too.

So what have we learned. we now know know how a bubble can be used to make excessive profits by prepositioning before the crisis, it can be used to get blood from the taxpayer to pay financial institutions 100 cents on the dollar for bad bets, and a crisis can be used to get favorable legislation passed.... we know all that so now you just have to extrapolate that info.


1. October 2008 you get a bailout passed in a crisis atmosphere, that's a template
2. Greece was pushed into crisis, that's a template.. I bet those guys at GS have a name for that Greece manuver like ENRON had a name for some of its schemes in California like ""Fat Boy", "Death Star", "Forney Perpetual Loop", "Ricochet", "Ping Pong", "Black Widow"...They probably named it something like bald eagle or turkey vulture or something like that
3. Govt debts have been increasing as the govt is propping up the economy means lots of money going out and revenues are down
4. Govt is borrowing money and everyone is expecting something to happen, the question is when
5. when rating agencies rate a countries ability to pay debt they look at revenue generation and expenditures
6. if a rating agency decides to lower a raing a country pays more for its debt
7. if a country wants to avoid a lower rating it has to cut spending and/or raise revenue ie taxes... in some cases where the IMF is involved the IMF demands it.
8. We have the market and commodties bubbling again and the real economy isn't recovering, unemployment is still high
9. if commodities keep increasing in price we will get another drop in the market as people can't pay for debt and pay for gasoline. Just like when we had a huge bubble in 2008 that was like a ton of TNT, it was the commodity run up that was the blasting cap. Like I said the real economy is not recovering, everything is still shakey, its just the bubble that's inflating and going to be popped.
9. if we get a dip in the market, and the govt debt is derated, there will be a crisis and there will be a push on capital hill for more cirsis legislation.

They did it once, and sooner or later there will be a reckoning and one timed with the up coming election would be most profitable

All you would need then is a crisis on capital hill... and the imminent threat of failure in the bond market because the US won't be able to meet it debt obligations by rolling it over with new bonds at higher interest rates would provide just the crisis.... of course the large financial institutions will have positioned themselves to make billions off of the tax payers like they did in Greece. And then you will have the "proposed" solutions to fix all of the problems.


Now since you have a "socialist" govt I would say that cutting spending is off the table so that leaves revenue generation
The two "new" revenue generators that have been talked about alot are VAT and Carbon Credits. Once these are installed companies like Goldamn Sachs and the other wall street crooks will make money, lots of money. And once the govt finally turns conservative you can be sure that a new goden age of "Reagan" will be trumpeted as these corporations push to have corporate taxes eliminated totally to be repalced with spending cuts and the money being generated by the VAT.

So you get
1. huge profits on the failing market, because you're prepositioned for it
2. favorable legislation creating a new carbon market which Goldman and a company, owned by henry paulson and Gore, combined own 20% of the chicago climate exchange and
3. later on they get corporate taxes eliminated based on revenue generated from the VAT

Now if you don't see that as being a possiblity... then there really isn't anything more to say. Anyway, if you want to troll do it elsewhere, or better yet come up with an original thought of your own.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5185|Sydney

Turquoise wrote:

A VAT isn't a bad thing....



...if it also involves a decrease in the income tax (or the end of payroll taxes).
We had the GST (similar to VAT) implemented here in Australia about 10 years ago. There was a massive debate about it and a lot of people (myself included) were really angry about the scheme.

Today my income tax is lower than ever, and I'm earning more than I used to.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6412|North Carolina

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

A VAT isn't a bad thing....



...if it also involves a decrease in the income tax (or the end of payroll taxes).
You know they wouldn't want that.
Depends...  the Blue Dogs are more open to this idea than the left wing of the party.  As far as I can tell, the Blue Dogs call the shots now, even though they don't have most of the positions of power in the party.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6412|North Carolina

Jaekus wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

A VAT isn't a bad thing....



...if it also involves a decrease in the income tax (or the end of payroll taxes).
We had the GST (similar to VAT) implemented here in Australia about 10 years ago. There was a massive debate about it and a lot of people (myself included) were really angry about the scheme.

Today my income tax is lower than ever, and I'm earning more than I used to.
Yeah, that trend is true in a lot of the First World when it comes to VATs/national sales taxes.  Granted, given the corruption of my government, it is a valid worry that things wouldn't turn out the same here.
DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6688|Disaster Free Zone

Jaekus wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

A VAT isn't a bad thing....



...if it also involves a decrease in the income tax (or the end of payroll taxes).
We had the GST (similar to VAT) implemented here in Australia about 10 years ago. It was the best tax reforms this country has seen.
fix'd
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6682|Canberra, AUS

Jaekus wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

A VAT isn't a bad thing....



...if it also involves a decrease in the income tax (or the end of payroll taxes).
We had the GST (similar to VAT) implemented here in Australia about 10 years ago. There was a massive debate about it and a lot of people (myself included) were really angry about the scheme.

Today my income tax is lower than ever, and I'm earning more than I used to.
I remember like two days after it was implemented every vox pop around was like "well... to be honest it isn't actually that bad". And now we pay less taxes and less tax.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5185|Sydney

DrunkFace wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

A VAT isn't a bad thing....



...if it also involves a decrease in the income tax (or the end of payroll taxes).
We had the GST (similar to VAT) implemented here in Australia about 10 years ago. It was the best tax reforms this country has seen.
fix'd
Well, considering my politcal bias to be against that party, I couldn't very well come out and say it, could I?
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6682|Canberra, AUS

Jaekus wrote:

DrunkFace wrote:

Jaekus wrote:


We had the GST (similar to VAT) implemented here in Australia about 10 years ago. It was the best tax reforms this country has seen.
fix'd
Well, considering my politcal bias to be against that party, I couldn't very well come out and say it, could I?
i do it fine.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6549|Texas - Bigger than France

Harmor wrote:

Obama suggests value-added tax may be an option

(via http://www.drudgereport.com/ )

http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/9489 … ec698b.jpg

Yahoo News wrote:

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama suggested Wednesday that a new value-added tax on Americans is still on the table, seeming to show more openness to the idea than his aides have expressed in recent days.

Before deciding what revenue options are best for dealing with the deficit and the economy, Obama said in an interview with CNBC, "I want to get a better picture of what our options are."

After Obama adviser Paul Volcker recently raised the prospect of a value-added tax, or VAT, the Senate voted 85-13 last week for a nonbinding "sense of the Senate" resolution that calls the such a tax "a massive tax increase that will cripple families on fixed income and only further push back America's economic recovery."

For days, White House spokesmen have said the president has not proposed and is not considering a VAT.

"I think I directly answered this the other day by saying that it wasn't something that the president had under consideration," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters shortly before Obama spoke with CNBC.

After the interview, White House deputy communications director Jen Psaki said nothing has changed and the White House is "not considering" a VAT.
Really...that's hard to believe.  I bet Obama would try after the election in November before the next Congress is seated.
Not quite sure if that's really on the table, might just be hot air.  I believe the quote at the time was "it would be crippling to the lower income folks during these economic times" or something like that.

Last edited by Pug (2010-04-22 06:49:27)

Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6723
Remember this is the US government... They will find someone to tax the shit out of everyone lol
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard